The New York Times: Stanza: “The iPhone or iPod Touch can act as an electronic book reader.”
Tip of the Week: Turn Your iPhone Into an e-Book

Heathen Slaves and Christian Rulers by Andrew, Elizabeth Wheeler, Bushnell, Katharine Caroline - CHAPTER 14.

(download Open eBook Format)

Heathen Slaves and Christian Rulers

CHAPTER 14.

PRO­TEC­TIVE OR­DI­NANCES.

Af­ter eigh­teen years' hard strug­gle, the British Abo­li­tion­ists suc­ceed­ed in get­ting Par­lia­ment to re­peal the Con­ta­gious Dis­eases Acts in force in cer­tain mil­itary sta­tions in Eng­land, and in force in oth­er parts of the British Em­pire. It now be­came the du­ty of the Sec­re­tary of State for the Colonies to see that all the Crown Colonies, such as Hong Kong and Sin­ga­pore fol­lowed suit. This was in 1886, and the Con­ta­gious Dis­eases Or­di­nances for these two places were not re­placed by oth­er leg­is­la­tion un­til 1888 at Sin­ga­pore, and 1890 at Hong Kong. From what we have seen of the spir­it of these of­fi­cials in gen­er­al it seems need­less to say that the old Con­ta­gious Dis­eases Or­di­nances were re­pealed amid a storm of protests. One of the Mu­nic­ipal Com­mis­sion­ers of Sin­ga­pore “said that the re­peal of the Con­ta­gious Dis­eases Or­di­nance was the most cru­el and mer­ci­less act which had ev­er been done.” A state­ment from the un­of­fi­cial mem­bers of the Leg­isla­tive Coun­cil at Hong Kong de­clared: “In Eng­land abus­es might have arisen un­der the re­cent law, but here it is im­pos­si­ble,” and very much more of the same false na­ture. The new Or­di­nances are ex­cel­lent read­ing, and in the hands of the right sort of of­fi­cials would do in­cal­cu­la­ble good. _But laws were not need­ed in the Colonies to put down slav­ery._ Mr. Fran­cis' Mem­oran­dum, and Sir John Smale's pro­nounce­ments have clear­ly demon­strat­ed that fact, but the right sort of men were need­ed to en­force the laws al­ready in ex­is­tence, in the same dis­in­ter­est­ed man­ner in which Sir John Smale had wrought so ef­fec­tu­al­ly. The new law was, how­ev­er, put in each case un­der the ad­min­is­tra­tion of the “Pro­tec­tor” and his staff of of­fi­cials, and the re­sult has been, and could but be un­sat­is­fac­to­ry, to the present day.

For in­stance, in 1893, Mr. H.E. Wode­house, Po­lice Mag­is­trate at Hong Kong, in re­port­ing on a case of sui­cide of a slave girl to the Colo­nial Sec­re­tary at Hong Kong, to be trans­mit­ted for the in­for­ma­tion of Lord Ripon, Sec­re­tary of State for the Colonies, who had asked for the in­for­ma­tion, goes quite ful­ly in­to a de­scrip­tion of con­di­tions at this time, three years af­ter the pas­sage of the Pro­tec­tive Or­di­nance. He says:

“The name of the de­ceased was Chan Ngan-​Kin.... She was reg­is­tered as a pros­ti­tute in this broth­el on the 23rd of De­cem­ber, 1890. When reg­is­ter­ing her name she said she had no pock­et-​moth­er, that her par­ents were both dead, and that she be­came a pros­ti­tute of her own free will. The in­spec­tor said that that was the de­scrip­tion of them­selves that near­ly all pros­ti­tutes give, and that it was very rarely that it was true. The fur­ther ev­idence went to prove that she and a young man were mu­tu­al­ly at­tached to each oth­er, and he was anx­ious to re­deem her, and that she was de­sirous of be­ing re­deemed, but that the price asked, two thou­sand three hun­dred dol­lars, was more than he was will­ing to give, though he was will­ing to give two thou­sand dol­lars.... There is lit­tle doubt that his in­abil­ity to re­deem her caused her to com­mit sui­cide.... The pock­et-​moth­er was not pro­duced [at the in­quest], and there was a gen­er­al dis­po­si­tion on the part of the Chi­nese wit­ness­es to with­hold in­for­ma­tion.”

Lord Ripon said in his let­ter of in­quiry: “If the facts were as stat­ed in the above-​men­tioned pa­per, it would seem to prove that it is not gen­er­al­ly un­der­stood in the Colony that a broth­el keep­er has no le­gal right to de­mand any re­demp­tion mon­ey for the re­lease of one of the in­mates.” To this the Mag­is­trate replies, in ex­pla­na­tion:

“It is not quite cor­rect to speak of the broth­el-​keep­er as de­mand­ing re­demp­tion mon­ey. The per­son whose prop­er­ty the pros­ti­tute is is the pock­et-​moth­er, that is to say, the pur­chas­er of the girl. Near­ly ev­ery pros­ti­tute has her own pock­et-​moth­er, and she it is who has sole con­trol over the pros­ti­tute's move­ments. All the earn­ings go to her, and the re­demp­tion mon­ey when re­demp­tion takes place. The 'broth­el-​keep­er' is a cre­ation of the Gov­ern­ment, and the term has, I think, led to some mis­ap­pre­ci­ation of the ac­tu­al state of things. It is true that, be­ing reg­is­tered by the Gov­ern­ment, she be­comes in a man­ner re­spon­si­ble for the prop­er con­duct of the es­tab­lish­ment, but the prop­er­ty in the girl does not rest in her, ex­cept in the case of the two or three girls to whom she may her­self be pock­et-​moth­er, that is to say, whom she may her­self have pur­chased. The pock­et-​moth­ers are the re­al pro­pri­etress­es of their pur­chas­es, and a broth­el-​keep­er would not re­gard her­self as in any way con­nect­ed with such girls, be­yond the obli­ga­tion de­volv­ing up­on her of reg­is­ter­ing the in­mates of the house of which she, as ten­ant or own­er, was the pro­pri­etress. A Chi­nese broth­el is in fact mere­ly a col­lec­tion un­der one roof of sev­er­al dif­fer­ent es­tab­lish­ments, con­sist­ing of the pock­et-​moth­ers and their pur­chas­es, the pock­et-​moth­ers for the most part be­ing the body-​ser­vants of their charges, and ad­min­is­ter­ing to their dai­ly wants, though in re­al­ity their mis­tress­es and their ab­so­lute own­ers.”

The doc­ument scarce­ly needs com­ment. It il­lus­trates the fact that one may have most ide­al laws, but laws nev­er op­er­ate au­to­mat­ical­ly, and in the ab­sence of any de­sire to “let the op­pressed go free,” but rather an ea­ger de­sire to hold them in sub­jec­tion to the base propen­si­ties of prof­li­gate men, as all the State doc­uments rep­re­sent­ing the sit­ua­tion tend to show, there is small proof that the “Wom­en and Girls' Pro­tec­tive Or­di­nance of 1889” has had any ap­pre­cia­ble ef­fect in al­ter­ing the slave con­di­tions at Hong Kong. The same old no­to­ri­ous in­spec­tor, John Lee, who, Gov­er­nor Hen­nessy thought, ought to have been pros­ecut­ed for manslaugh­ter, af­ter he hound­ed those na­tive wom­en to their death, was Chief In­spec­tor of Broth­els at Hong Kong in 1894, when we made in­ves­ti­ga­tions in that Colony, and per­son­al­ly in­ter­viewed many of these slave girls, and heard their sto­ries.

The most re­cent of­fi­cial doc­uments re­lat­ing to the mat­ter have been com­ment­ed up­on in _The Shield_ (or­gan of the British Com­mit­tee of the In­ter­na­tion­al Pu­ri­ty Fed­er­ation), in its is­sue dat­ed Lon­don, June, 1906, as fol­lows:

"One of the most im­por­tant par­lia­men­tary pa­pers of re­cent years on our ques­tion has just been is­sued in re­sponse to ques­tions put in the House of Com­mons by Mr. Hen­ry J. Wil­son, M.P., on March 8th last. The ti­tle is, 'Fur­ther Cor­re­spon­dence re­lat­ing to Mea­sures Adopt­ed for Check­ing the Spread of Vene­re­al Dis­ease' (Cd. 2903), and re­lates to en­act­ments in the Straits Set­tle­ments, Hong Kong, and Gibral­tar, dur­ing the pe­ri­od in which the Rt. Hon. Joseph Cham­ber­lain was at the head of the Colo­nial of­fice.

"The cor­re­spon­dence in ques­tion fur­ther re­veals the ex­is­tence and ex­tent of a 'Yel­low Slave Trade' in the East of large di­men­sions. The girls in ques­tion are stat­ed to be 'bought when young,' and 'be­lieve them­selves bound body and soul to the broth­el-​keep­ers.' Nine hun­dred and six­ty-​eight Chi­nese wom­en, pre­sum­ably of this kind, are re­port­ed at Penang, and 62 Japanese wom­en. There were 176 ad­mis­sions of Japanese wom­en, and 141 ad­mis­sions of Chi­nese wom­en in 1899 to the pub­lic hos­pi­tal at Sin­ga­pore, be­sides num­bers of oth­er cas­es to pri­vate hos­pi­tals main­tained by the keep­ers of the hous­es of ill-​fame.

"Many pas­sages in the cor­re­spon­dence give ev­idence of a con­tin­ual im­port traf­fic go­ing on, which the head of the Reg­ula­tion De­part­ment, the 'Pro­tec­tor of Chi­nese,' at Sin­ga­pore, seems to have made some ef­fort to coun­ter­act. He speaks of ten girls be­tween 9 and 15 that he at­tempt­ed to res­cue from sale to a trav­el­ing deal­er, but who were re­turned to their for­mer sur­round­ings on a writ of _habeas cor­pus_ by the Supreme Court; but up­on in­for­ma­tion in re­gard to this case reach­ing the Colo­nial of­fice in Lon­don, cor­re­spon­dence en­sued which re­sult­ed in Mr. Cham­ber­lain di­rect­ing an al­ter­ation of the law to meet the case of the pros­ecu­tion which had so lamentably failed.

"The Pro­tec­tor of Chi­nese al­so tells of 'girls un­der ten years of age who are bought and sold in the colony,' 'brought from Chi­na for pur­pos­es of sale,' 'gen­er­al­ly sold to in­mates of broth­els,' and of wom­en who are 'in the habit of ar­riv­ing from Chi­na with re­lays of ba­bies' for the same pur­pose. The Straits Set­tle­ments Gov­ern­ment thus at­tempts to cut off a twig here and there of the tree of this evil traf­fic, whilst leav­ing un­touched the root and trunk of the tree it­self, the State pro­tec­tion of vice, by which it is made prac­ti­ca­ble safe­ly to in­vest large cap­ital in this most ne­far­ious but lu­cra­tive traf­fic.

"Page 4 of this Cor­re­spon­dence shows that an or­di­nance was passed in 1899, im­pos­ing very heavy fines and im­pris­on­ment on any keep­er of a broth­el who al­lowed any of the in­mates suf­fer­ing from con­ta­gious dis­ease to re­main in the house. This has led to a sys­tem of pri­vate ar­range­ments with med­ical men for the pe­ri­od­ical san­itary in­spec­tion and treat­ment of the in­mates.

"At page 19 the Act­ing Colo­nial Sur­geon says: 'A large num­ber of Japanese hous­es had some time be­fore made pri­vate ar­range­ments with my part­ner, Dr. Muglis­ton and my­self, for med­ical at­ten­dance, and the ru­mor re­gard­ing the in­tend­ed leg­is­la­tion in­duced most of the re­main­der to fol­low their ex­am­ple dur­ing the month of Septem­ber. The in­crease of Japanese in­mates (of the hos­pi­tal) for this month, there­fore, was caused by our send­ing in those cas­es of dis­ease then found among these fresh hous­es.' Para­graph 4, the same page, says: 'With re­gard to the Chi­nese wom­en we al­ready had long had a num­ber of Chi­nese broth­els to at­tend pro­fes­sion­al­ly; dur­ing Septem­ber of 1899 a large pro­por­tion of the re­main­der made sim­ilar ar­range­ments with us.'

"It is dif­fi­cult to say pos­itive­ly what the pre­cise na­ture of these trans­ac­tions is, but it is on­ly too ev­ident that the act­ing Colo­nial sur­geon, with his pro­fes­sion­al part­ner, was most im­prop­er­ly mixed up with the busi­ness ar­range­ments of the broth­el-​keep­ers. These peo­ple, in­deed, fig­ure so that they must have con­sti­tut­ed a very good, and per­haps the most lu­cra­tive por­tion of the prac­tice of these doc­tors.

"To cope with the ex­tra busi­ness brought in by these ar­range­ments, sec­tion 2 of para­graph 4, page 19, says: 'In Septem­ber, 1899, four pri­vate lock hos­pi­tals were or­ga­nized, one in each of the four main sec­tions of broth­els, by the keep­ers un­der our di­rec­tion.' Para­graph 6 says: 'We make fre­quent pe­ri­od­ic in­spec­tions of the Chi­nese broth­els, see­ing each in­mate, and vis­it our pri­vate hos­pi­tals dai­ly.' Here, again, it may be asked what are the pre­cise re­la­tions of the act­ing Colo­nial sur­geon to 'our pri­vate hos­pi­tals?' It is sat­is­fac­to­ry to know that in­quiries are be­ing made by our Par­lia­men­tary friends in re­gard to this pe­cu­liar, if not sus­pi­cious, cir­cum­stance.

"Mr. Cham­ber­lain, with all the fore­go­ing facts be­fore his eyes, says on page 21: 'I am glad to find that the Pro­tec­tor of Chi­nese and the act­ing Colo­nial sur­geon have, so far, been able to give such a sat­is­fac­to­ry re­port of the work­ing of the or­di­nance.'

"At Hong Kong, 'the keep­ers of Chi­nese and Japanese broth­els fre­quent­ed by Eu­ro­peans have re­tained pri­vate prac­ti­tion­ers as their med­ical ad­vis­ers, and a small pri­vate lock-​hos­pi­tal has been in­sti­tut­ed for Japanese wom­en.' This fol­lowed on 33 pros­ecu­tions in­sti­tut­ed by the po­lice in re­spect of 89 com­plaints made by sol­diers and sailors of the British forces. Page 35 and else­where show that pros­ecu­tions have tak­en place of 'sly broth­els,' com­pet­ing with the 'reg­ular pro­fessed broth­els.'

“It is to be hoped that this Blue-​book will, with facts now be­ing pub­lished in var­ious parts of Eu­rope and in Amer­ica, draw at­ten­tion to the ne­ces­si­ty of a new move­ment (sup­ple­men­tary to the great move­ment now on foot for the sup­pres­sion of the 'White Slave Trade'), for the sup­pres­sion of the 'Yel­low Slave Trade,' which is be­com­ing al­most world-​wide in char­ac­ter.”

As the sup­ply of girls both in Sin­ga­pore and Hong Kong comes very large­ly from Can­ton, let us first de­scribe the con­di­tions we found there. Our Jour­nal of Febru­ary 14th, 1894, reads as fol­lows:

"We went in com­pa­ny with a mis­sion­ary and a na­tive, both of whom could talk both En­glish and Chi­nese, and vis­it­ed some 'flow­er-​boats' on the riv­er. Many of these boats are quite pre­ten­tious, with their rich wood-​carv­ing, fine fur­ni­ture, and gaudy dis­play of tin­sel. There were whole streets of them,--float­ing hous­es moored to­geth­er; we walked along the length of the street on one side, step­ping from the bow of one boat to the next, the bows of the boats con­sti­tut­ing front ve­ran­dahs. We called at al­most ev­ery place, but a de­scrip­tion of one will do for all. First, as we en­tered, was a couch for opi­um smok­ing; just be­yond this a re­cep­tion room, very gaudy, with dozens of hang­ing lamps, and at one end a shrine for the gods, and of­fer­ings be­fore it. In a room back of the re­cep­tion room, and al­so up­stairs, there were girls in large num­bers. A hard-​fea­tured old wom­an came for­ward from the back room, who, our in­ter­preter said, was as good a spec­imen as we could pos­si­bly have seen of an old broth­el-​keep­er of Can­ton, one who had been in the busi­ness for many years of buy­ing or oth­er­wise ob­tain­ing ba­bies and girls, and train­ing them for pros­ti­tu­tion. The girls came crowd­ing to the door of the back room, and looked in up­on us with ea­ger cu­rios­ity. Our in­ter­preter called our at­ten­tion to the man­ner of dress­ing the hair,--like mar­ried wom­en,--as in­di­cat­ing their bad life. The in­ter­preter said they were in­duct­ed usu­al­ly at about thir­teen years of age. They were all dressed very show­ily, and heav­ily pow­dered and paint­ed, ex­cept­ing some mere ba­bies who were plain­ly dressed. Troops of lit­tle girls, from four to five years of age, swarmed out of the neigh­bor­ing 'flow­er-​boats' and gath­ered around us, scream­ing and scram­bling, falling, laugh­ing, and fol­low­ing us the full length of the street, which was made up of about twen­ty such boats on ei­ther side. And none of these in­no­cent lit­tle things at all re­al­ized the fate in store for them. In one place we saw two very old wom­en in the front room. In an­oth­er, a wom­an knelt be­fore the idol­atrous shrine en­gaged in her de­vo­tions. At one point there was a very large boat bril­liant­ly fit­ted up for mu­sic, danc­ing, smok­ing opi­um, and feast­ing. At the far end of the street was a 'kitchen-​boat,' from which sup­plies of food, ready cooked, could be bought. All the way along we saw lit­tle girls with the un­mis­tak­able signs of their des­tiny up­on them. Our in­ter­preter said the girls were usu­al­ly made to stay up­stairs dur­ing the day time, but at night the whole place was il­lu­mi­nat­ed and alive; then they were brought down and to the front. Oc­ca­sion­al­ly we would see one of these huge house boats full of paint­ed girls, float­ing down the mid­dle of the stream, for they move about from place to place at will.

"At Can­ton, Febru­ary 18th, 1894, we met and con­versed with a mis­sion­ary la­dy who had just come from a sta­tion in the in­te­ri­or. She had trav­elled from her sta­tion on a Chi­nese boat, which had been char­tered by her adopt­ed son for his use go­ing up, and for hers com­ing down the riv­er. When she was about to em­bark, she re­quired that the men should search the boat, and down be­low, in the very bot­tom, were a lot of lit­tle girls--_child slaves_--be­ing smug­gled to Can­ton for the trade of a vile life. She made the men take the chil­dren off the boat, but with great dif­fi­cul­ty. They re­sist­ed, but she stood coura­geous­ly, and saw her com­mands ex­ecut­ed. Af­ter she had ac­com­plished this, and start­ed down the riv­er, all alone, so far as any En­glish-​speak­ing per­son was con­cerned, the men, who were still deeply en­raged at be­ing de­feat­ed in their plans, great­ly an­noyed her by in­trud­ing on her con­stant­ly, and fi­nal­ly they threat­ened to kill her; but she pre­sent­ed as brave a front as pos­si­ble, and at last took hold of one man who was es­pe­cial­ly in­so­lent, by the shoul­der, in an au­thor­ita­tive man­ner, bid­ding him to go out of her pres­ence. He went away cowed, and they all said, as was re­port­ed to her by one of her at­ten­dants, 'She is not afraid'; they then be­came very su­per­sti­tious at the idea of a wom­an tak­ing hold of them, and trou­bled her no more.

“The five or six Chris­tian friends where we were stay­ing in Can­ton all agreed that it was the most com­mon oc­cur­rence for lit­tle girls to be bought and sold for im­moral pur­pos­es. One of the group has of­ten heard the wretched blind girls singing just un­der her win­dow, on the riv­er bank, and un­der con­duct of the old broth­el-​keep­er, their own­er, thus at­tract­ing cus­tom. The pro­por­tion of blind peo­ple in Ori­en­tal coun­tries is much greater, ow­ing to the preva­lence of eye dis­eases and the pover­ty and ig­no­rance of the peo­ple in cop­ing with these, than in the West; and as blind girls do not bring much mon­ey when dis­posed of as wives, so they are sold in large num­bers in­to a life of shame. Poor lit­tle slaves! Be­cause they are de­prived of the nat­ural light of day, so they are des­tined nev­er to see a ray of moral light en­ter their mis­er­able ex­is­tence! We saw three or four lit­tle blind girls who had been res­cued, by these Chris­tian work­ers, from their ter­ri­ble fate; but these are on­ly a few rare ex­cep­tions out of the thou­sands that are borne on in­to the tide of shame and an­guish con­tin­ual­ly.”

Of the many girls we in­ter­viewed at Hong Kong the sto­ry of the fol­low­ing seems typ­ical of her class, so we ex­tract it from our jour­nal:

"At the first place we called there were six in­mates--four of whom were present at the in­ter­view. The keep­er went out of the room as we en­tered, and did not re­turn. The girls were very friend­ly, and one of them talked a lit­tle En­glish. This one told us that she came from Can­ton, and, in bro­ken En­glish, said that she had 'no fa­ther, no moth­er, no broth­er; a poor man took her when a _very_ lit­tle child and raised her to sell. By and by a wom­an came and of­fered to buy poor man's lit­tle girl, and as he had but lit­tle food, he asks, 'How much?' then she buys the lit­tle girl and brings her to Hong Kong. Then wom­an take her to En­glish­man and say, 'She first-​class girl,' and he say, 'I make her my wife,' but he not good; he no hus­band; he go away to his house--Eng­land.' Thus she de­scribed in a few sim­ple words the tragedy of her life with tears in her eyes; her train­ing for vice; her sale; her hopes of mar­riage; her de­ser­tion; the out­come, her con­sign­ment to a Gov­ern­ment-​li­censed broth­el. She was but one of the tens of thou­sands at Hong Kong. We asked, 'How would a girl have to do in or­der to live in this house?' They said, 'She must be reg­is­tered at the Lock. Hos­pi­tal, and would have to go to the Court and Mr. Lock­hart (the Reg­is­trar-​Gen­er­al) would ask her ques­tions; whether she had a fa­ther and moth­er; how old she was; _where the mon­ey went to that was paid for her_; and whether she want­ed to be a pros­ti­tute or not.' We asked, 'If a girl should say that she _did not_ want to be a pros­ti­tute what would be done?' They an­swered, 'No girl would _dare_ to say this _when she had been bought_.' We asked the girl who talked En­glish over again about this, and she said the same.

“All the places of in­famy re­served for the use of Eu­ro­peans which we vis­it­ed in Hong Kong, were with­in three min­utes' walk of Vic­to­ria Ho­tel, in the very bus­iest part of the city. Close by our ho­tel were such world-​famed shops as 'Wat­son and Co.,' 'Kel­ly and Walsh,' etc.; a short dis­tance down the street were the Postof­fice and the Supreme Court build­ings. The re­spectable En­glish res­idents of Hong Kong can­not go about the streets of the city with­out see­ing these places; there are drap­er-​shops and oth­er places vis­it­ed dai­ly and hourly by re­spectable for­eign­ers and na­tives, oc­cu­py­ing the ground floor of these broth­els. The fine new build­ing of the Girls' High School, un­der the man­age­ment of the Gov­ern­ment, is with­in five min­utes' walk; yet all these broth­els are glar­ing­ly num­bered, as reg­is­tered by the city, in huge fig­ures eight or ten inch­es high, of red on a white back­ground, paint­ed on the doors of the stair­ways lead­ing to the sec­ond sto­ry of the build­ings oc­cu­pied by these shops. The school chil­dren can­not pass by with­out not­ing these of­fi­cial­ly num­bered hous­es, and see­ing the girls sit­ting at all hours of the day and in­to the night con­spic­uous­ly in the bal­conies over the shops of drap­ers, gro­cers, tai­lors, silk-​mer­chants, shoe-​deal­ers, &c., &c., and of­ten hear­ing them call­ing to each oth­er from house to house, and to the men in the pub­lic streets be­low. Mrs. An­drew, when in the street, March 2nd, saw a group of these slave-​wom­en call­ing down to three po­lice­men, who were look­ing up and laugh­ing at them. These are dai­ly sights.”

The un­blush­ing pa­rade of forms of vice, which have been man­ufac­tured in the Ori­ent es­pe­cial­ly to meet the de­mands of rene­gade mem­bers of Chris­tian civ­iliza­tion, can be seen in a pe­cu­liar­ly painful and brazen form in the city of Hong Kong.

While we were at Hong Kong, there oc­cured a great cel­ebra­tion in hon­or of the re­pair and reded­ica­tion of an im­por­tant Bud­dhist tem­ple. There was a grand pro­ces­sion, and many thou­sands of Chi­nese from the main­land came over to wit­ness the cel­ebra­tion. The pa­rade formed in the ear­ly morn­ing and went at once to the res­idence of the Gov­er­nor to do him hon­or, af­ter which it marched through the prin­ci­pal streets of the city. It was a cu­ri­ous, in­ter­est­ing, and with­al a painful sight, in some re­gards not un­like in­dus­tri­al pa­rades in our own coun­try. At night we saw some­thing to­tal­ly unique and dif­fi­cult to de­scribe to those who have not wit­nessed the same in Chi­na. Men bore aloft great drag­ons and fish­es in­nu­mer­able, of all sizes and shapes, (but very true to life), giv­en a nat­ural col­or and light­ed up with­in, like Chi­nese lanterns. These were held aloft on the ends of long poles, and as the men who car­ried them were in­vis­ible, be­cause of the dark­ness, and trod noise­less­ly be­cause of bare, or mere­ly san­daled feet, the im­pres­sion was of an im­mense train of these crea­tures float­ing or swim­ming silent­ly through the air.

The pro­ces­sion was made up of men of all sorts and kinds. Great fat men with enor­mous fans pant­ed along, and lit­tle boys ran by their side with stools up­on which they grave­ly seat­ed them­selves when­ev­er the line of march was halt­ed for a mo­ment. Lit­tle boys pro­gressed painful­ly along with the rest, walk­ing on their hands, with their feet thrown up in­to the air, or spin­ning along on all fours like wheels, or go­ing through var­ious oth­er an­tics. And, con­trary to any­thing that could have hap­pened away from the open ports of Chi­na, there were many wom­en in the pa­rade, and girls too. They were on horse­back, in sedan chairs, borne on wheeled plat­forms, like our “God­dess of Lib­er­ty” rep­re­sen­ta­tions on the Fourth of Ju­ly; walk­ing, and some­times rid­ing on bul­locks. We count­ed 150 wom­en in all. These were dressed and paint­ed up in such a style that a sin­gle glance showed they be­longed to the dis­rep­utable class, and their old “pock­et-​moth­ers,” were to be seen walk­ing along close to them and keep­ing a sharp look­out over their gaudi­ly dressed slaves. Yet more painful was the sight of the lit­tle girls, bound to heavy wires and placed in all man­ner of con­tor­tions. Here was a girl about six­teen, stand­ing cross-​legged on a mov­ing plat­form, hold­ing a spear in each hand, the spears crossed in front of her breast, and a lit­tle girl dan­gling from each spear-​point. So it ap­peared, but in fact all were well wired in­to the dis­tress­ing shape they oc­cu­pied, and it was said that none of them could have en­dured the po­si­tion for a mo­ment but for plen­ti­ful dos­es of opi­um. Next passed a girl stand­ing on the mov­ing plat­form, hold­ing a spear at arm's length, and a three-​year-​old girl stand­ing on its point. Then a lit­tle boy hold­ing a long rod from which was sus­pend­ed a tiny child. A girl passed sit­ting on a stool and hold­ing a sword by its point with a child of four sus­pend­ed from its han­dle, and next a girl hold­ing a sword by its han­dle, and the child sus­pend­ed from its point. One girl sat play­ing a flute held up high in the air, and a girl of six ap­peared to be sus­pend­ed from it. One poor lit­tle thing was borne high up in the air, astride a turn­ing-​pole, with legs well crossed be­neath the pole. And then there came along a lit­tle girl sway­ing about on the end of a long pole car­ried by men in the pro­ces­sion. We were on the sec­ond floor of a great ve­ran­dah of the ho­tel, and the child swung so close to us, that we start­ed for­ward to­ward her with a cry of pity. Great tears were rolling down her cheeks, and she seemed to look straight in­to our eyes, and at­tempt­ed a sick­ly smile at our ex­pres­sions of pity.

Lat­er, af­ter the pro­ces­sion of fish­es, we sat in com­pa­ny with two Chi­nese min­is­ters of the Gospel who came to call up­on us, and dis­cussed in sad­ness the scenes of the day. They said, if we had un­der­stood the na­tive lan­guage and joined in the pro­ces­sion, as they did at times, we would have heard the old “pock­et-​moth­ers” and oth­er own­ers of these girls driv­ing bar­gains for their sale, tem­porar­ily or per­ma­nent­ly, with the men of the crowds. These na­tive Chris­tians mar­velled that En­glish­men and Amer­ican men who called them­selves “Chris­tians” could have joined in these fes­tiv­ities in hon­or of a hea­then tem­ple, and that the Gov­er­nor should have made a speech of con­grat­ula­tion, with no re­buke of these scenes of in­hu­man tor­ture of wom­en and child slaves, when the pro­ces­sion paused at his door. These pa­rades con­tin­ued two or three days, al­ways ac­com­pa­nied by the great pa­per drag­ons, whether in the day­time or at night, by the noise of deaf­en­ing tom-​toms, and the sick­en­ing sight of tor­tured slave-​girls.