Early Britain Anglo-Saxon Britain by Allen, Grant - CHAPTER III.

(download Open eBook Format)

Early Britain Anglo-Saxon Britain

CHAPTER III.

THE EN­GLISH SET­TLE IN BRITAIN.

Prox­im­ity to the sea turns rob­bers in­to cor­sairs. When preda­to­ry tribes reach the seaboard they al­ways take to pira­cy, pro­vid­ed they have at­tained the ship­build­ing lev­el of cul­ture. In the an­cient Ægean, in the Malay Archipela­go, in the Chi­na seas, we see the same pro­cess al­ways tak­ing place. Prob­ably from the first pe­ri­od of their sev­er­ance from the main Aryan stock in Cen­tral Asia, the Low Ger­man race and their an­ces­tors had been a preda­to­ry and con­quer­ing peo­ple, for ev­er en­gaged in raids and smoul­der­ing war­fare with their neigh­bours. When they reached the Baltic and the is­lands of the Frisian coast, they grew nat­ural­ly in­to a na­tion of pi­rates. Even dur­ing the bronze age, we find sculp­tured stones with rep­re­sen­ta­tions of long row-​boats, manned by sev­er­al oars­men, and in one or two cas­es ac­tu­al­ly bear­ing a rude sail. Their prows and sterns stand high out of the wa­ter, and are adorned with in­tri­cate carv­ings. They seem like the pre­de­ces­sors of the long ships–snakes and sea-​drag­ons–which af­ter­wards bore the north­ern cor­sairs in­to ev­ery riv­er of Eu­rope. Such boats, adapt­ed for long sea-​voy­ages, show a con­sid­er­able in­ter­course, pi­rat­ical or com­mer­cial, be­tween the An­glo-​Sax­on or Scan­di­na­vian North and oth­er dis­tant coun­tries. Cer­tain­ly, from the ear­li­est days of Ro­man rule on the Ger­man Ocean to the thir­teenth cen­tu­ry, the Low Dutch and Scan­di­na­vian tribes car­ried on an al­most un­bro­ken course of ex­pe­di­tions by sea, be­gin­ning in ev­ery case with mere de­scents up­on the coast for the pur­pos­es of plun­der, but end­ing, as a rule, with reg­ular coloni­sa­tion or po­lit­ical suprema­cy. In this man­ner the peo­ple of the Baltic and the North Sea rav­aged or set­tled in ev­ery coun­try on the sea-​shore, from Orkney, Shet­land, and the Faroes, to Nor­mandy, Apu­lia, and Greece; from Boulogne and Kent, to Ice­land, Green­land, and, per­haps, Amer­ica. The coloni­sa­tion of South-​East­ern Britain was but the first chap­ter in this long his­to­ry of preda­to­ry ex­cur­sions on the part of the Low Ger­man peo­ples.

The pi­rat­ical ships of the ear­ly En­glish were row-​boats of very sim­ple con­struc­tion. We ac­tu­al­ly pos­sess one un­doubt­ed spec­imen at the present day, whose very date is fixed for us by the cir­cum­stances of its dis­cov­ery. It was dug up, some years since, from a peat-​bog in Sleswick, the old Eng­land of our fore­fa­thers, along with iron arms and im­ple­ments, and in as­so­ci­ation with Ro­man coins rang­ing in date from A.D. 67 to A.D. 217. It may there­fore be pret­ty con­fi­dent­ly as­signed to the first half of the third cen­tu­ry. In this in­ter­est­ing rel­ic, then, we have one of the iden­ti­cal boats in which the de­scents up­on the British coast were first made. The craft is rude­ly built of oak­en boards, and is sev­en­ty feet long by nine broad. The stem and stern are alike in shape, and the boat is fit­ted for be­ing beached up­on the fore­shore. A sculp­tured stone at Hägge­by, in Up­lande, rough­ly rep­re­sents for us such a ship un­der way, prob­ably of about the same date. It is rowed with twelve pairs of oars, and has no sails; and it con­tains no oth­er per­sons but the row­ers and a coxswain, who act­ed doubt­less as lead­er of the ex­pe­di­tion. Such a boat might con­vey about 120 fight­ing men.

There are some grounds for be­liev­ing that, even be­fore the es­tab­lish­ment of the Ro­man pow­er in Britain, Teu­ton­ic pi­rates from the north­ern marsh­lands were al­ready in the habit of plun­der­ing the Celtic in­hab­itants of the coun­try be­tween the Wash and the mouth of the Thames; and it is pos­si­ble that an En­glish colony may, even then, have es­tab­lished it­self in the mod­ern Lin­colnshire. But, be this as it may, we know at least that dur­ing the pe­ri­od of the Ro­man oc­cu­pa­tion, Low Ger­man ad­ven­tur­ers were con­stant­ly en­gaged in de­scend­ing up­on the ex­posed coasts of the En­glish Chan­nel and the North Sea. The Low Ger­man tribe near­est to the Ro­man provinces was that of the Sax­ons, and ac­cord­ing­ly these Teu­ton­ic pi­rates, of what­ev­er race, were known as Sax­ons by the provin­cials, and all En­glish­men are still so called by the mod­ern Celts, in Wales, Scot­land, and Ire­land.

The out­ly­ing Ro­man provinces were close at hand, easy to reach, rich, ill-​de­fend­ed, and a tempt­ing prey for the bar­bar­ic tribes­men of the north. Set­ting out in their light open skiffs from the is­lands at the mouth of the Elbe, or off the shore af­ter­wards sub­merged in what is now the Zuy­der Zee, the En­glish or Sax­on pi­rates crossed the sea with the preva­lent north-​east wind, and land­ed all along the provin­cial coasts of Gaul and Britain. As the em­pire de­cayed un­der the as­saults of the Goths, their rav­ages turned in­to reg­ular set­tle­ments. One great body pil­laged, age af­ter age, the neigh­bour­hood of Bayeux, where, be­fore the mid­dle of the fifth cen­tu­ry, it es­tab­lished a flour­ish­ing colony, and where the towns and vil­lages all still bear names of Sax­on ori­gin. An­oth­er horde first plun­dered and then took up its abode near Boulogne, where lo­cal names of the En­glish patronymic type al­so abound to the present day. In Britain it­self, at a date not lat­er than the end of the fourth cen­tu­ry, we find (in the “Noti­tia Im­per­il”) an of­fi­cer who bears the ti­tle of Count of the Sax­on Shore, and whose ju­ris­dic­tion ex­tend­ed from Lin­colnshire to Southamp­ton Wa­ter. The ti­tle prob­ably in­di­cates that pi­rat­ical in­cur­sions had al­ready set in on Britain, and the du­ty of the count was most like­ly that of re­pelling the En­glish in­vaders.

As soon as the Ro­mans found them­selves com­pelled to with­draw their gar­ri­son from Britain, leav­ing the provinces to de­fend them­selves as best they might, the temp­ta­tion to the En­glish pi­rates be­came a thou­sand times stronger than be­fore. Though the so-​called his­to­ry of the con­quest, hand­ed down to us by Bæ­da and the “En­glish Chron­icle,”[1] is now con­sid­ered by many en­quir­ers to be myth­ical in al­most ev­ery par­tic­ular, the facts them­selves speak out for us with un­hesi­tat­ing cer­tain­ty. We know that about the mid­dle of the fifth cen­tu­ry, short­ly af­ter the with­draw­al of the reg­ular Ro­man troops, sev­er­al bod­ies of hea­then An­glo-​Sax­ons, be­long­ing to the three tribes of Jutes, En­glish, and Sax­ons, set­tled _en masse_ on the south-​east­ern shores of Britain, from the Firth of Forth to the Isle of Wight. The age of mere plun­der­ing de­scents was de­ci­sive­ly over, and the age of set­tle­ment and coloni­sa­tion had set in. These hea­then An­glo-​Sax­ons drove away, ex­ter­mi­nat­ed, or en­slaved the Ro­man­ised and Chris­tianised Celts, broke down ev­ery ves­tige of Ro­man civil­isa­tion, de­stroyed the church­es, burnt the vil­las, laid waste many of the towns, and re-​in­tro­duced a long pe­ri­od of pa­gan bar­barism. For a while Britain re­mains en­veloped in an age of com­plete un­cer­tain­ty, and hea­then myths in­ter­vene be­tween the Chris­tian his­tor­ical pe­ri­od of the Ro­mans and the Chris­tian his­tor­ical pe­ri­od ini­ti­at­ed by the con­ver­sion of Kent. Of South-​East­ern Britain un­der the pa­gan An­glo-​Sax­ons we know prac­ti­cal­ly noth­ing, save by in­fer­ence and anal­ogy, or by the scanty ev­idence of archæol­ogy.

[1] For an ac­count of these two main au­thor­ities see fur­ther on, Bæ­da in chap­ter xi., and the “Chron­icle” in chap­ter xvi­ii.

Ac­cord­ing to tra­di­tion the Jutes came first. In 449, says the Celtic leg­end (the date is quite un­trust­wor­thy), they land­ed in Kent, where they first set­tled in Ruim, which we En­glish call Thanet–then re­al­ly an is­land, and grad­ual­ly spread them­selves over the main­land, cap­tur­ing the great Ro­man fortress of Rochester and coast land as far as Lon­don. Though the de­tails of this sto­ry are full of myth­ical ab­sur­di­ties, the anal­ogy of the lat­er Dan­ish colonies gives it an air of great prob­abil­ity, as the Danes al­ways set­tled first in is­lands or penin­su­las, and thence pro­ceed­ed to over­run, and fi­nal­ly to an­nex, the ad­ja­cent dis­trict. A sec­ond Jutish horde es­tab­lished it­self in the Isle of Wight and on the op­po­site shore of Hamp­shire. But the whole share borne by the Jutes in the set­tle­ment of Britain seems to have been but small.

The Sax­ons came sec­ond in time, if we may be­lieve the leg­ends. In 477, Ælle, with his three sons, is said to have land­ed on the south coast, where he found­ed the colony of the South Sax­ons, or Sus­sex. In 495, Cerdic and Cyn­ric led an­oth­er kin­dred horde to the south-​west­ern shore, and made the first set­tle­ment of the West Sax­ons, or Wes­sex. Of the be­gin­nings of the East Sax­on com­mu­ni­ty in Es­sex, and of the Mid­dle Sax­ons in Mid­dle­sex, we know lit­tle, even by tra­di­tion. The Sax­ons un­doubt­ed­ly came over in large num­bers; but a con­sid­er­able body of their fel­low-​tribes­men still re­mained up­on the Con­ti­nent, where they were still in­de­pen­dent and un­con­vert­ed up to the time of Karl the Great.

The En­glish, on the oth­er hand, ap­par­ent­ly mi­grat­ed in a body. There is no trace of any En­glish­men in Den­mark or Ger­many af­ter the ex­odus to Britain. Their lan­guage, of which a di­alect still sur­vives in Fries­land, has ut­ter­ly died out in Sleswick. The En­glish took for their share of Britain the near­est east coast. We have lit­tle record of their ar­rival, even in the leg­endary sto­ry; we mere­ly learn that in 547, Ida “suc­ceed­ed to the king­dom” of the Northum­bri­ans, whence we may pos­si­bly con­clude that the colony was al­ready es­tab­lished. The En­glish set­tle­ment ex­tend­ed from the Forth to Es­sex, and was sub­di­vid­ed in­to Ber­ni­cia, Deira, and East An­glia.

Wher­ev­er the An­glo-​Sax­ons came, their first work was to stamp out with fire and sword ev­ery trace of the Ro­man civil­isa­tion. Mod­ern in­ves­ti­ga­tions amongst pa­gan An­glo-​Sax­on bar­rows in Britain show the Low Ger­man race as pure bar­bar­ians, great at de­struc­tion, but in­ca­pable of con­struc­tive work. Pro­fes­sor Rolle­ston, who has opened sev­er­al of these ear­ly hea­then tombs of our Teu­ton­ic an­ces­tors, finds in them ev­ery­where abun­dant ev­idence of “their great apt­ness at de­stroy­ing, and their great slow­ness in elab­orat­ing, ma­te­ri­al civil­isa­tion.” Un­til the An­glo-​Sax­on re­ceived from the Con­ti­nent the Chris­tian re­li­gion and the Ro­man cul­ture, he was a mere av­er­age Aryan bar­bar­ian, with a strong taste for war and plun­der, but with small love for any of the arts of peace. Wher­ev­er else, in Gaul, Spain, or Italy, the Teu­ton­ic bar­bar­ians came in con­tact with the Ro­man civil­isa­tion, they re­ceived the re­li­gion of Christ, and the arts of the con­quered peo­ple, dur­ing or be­fore their con­quest of the coun­try. But in Britain the Teu­ton­ic in­vaders re­mained pa­gans long af­ter their set­tle­ment in the is­land; and they ut­ter­ly de­stroyed, in the south-​east­ern tract, al­most ev­ery rel­ic of the Ro­man rule and of the Chris­tian faith. Hence we have here the cu­ri­ous fact that, dur­ing the fifth and sixth cen­turies, a belt of in­tru­sive and ag­gres­sive hea­then­dom in­ter­venes be­tween the Chris­tians of the Con­ti­nent and the Chris­tian Welsh and Irish of west­ern Britain. The Church of the Celtic Welsh was cut off for more than a hun­dred years from the Church­es of the Ro­man world by a hos­tile and im­pass­able bar­ri­er of hea­then En­glish, Jutes, and Sax­ons. Their sep­ara­tion pro­duced many mo­men­tous ef­fects on the af­ter his­to­ry both of the Welsh them­selves and of their En­glish con­querors.