Early Britain Anglo-Saxon Britain by Allen, Grant - CHAPTER XV.

(download Open eBook Format)

Early Britain Anglo-Saxon Britain

CHAPTER XV.

THE RE­COV­ERY OF THE NORTH.

The his­to­ry of the tenth cen­tu­ry and the first half of the eleventh con­sists en­tire­ly of the con­tin­ued con­test be­tween the West Sax­ons and the Scan­di­na­vians. It falls nat­ural­ly in­to three pe­ri­ods. The first is that of the En­glish re­ac­tion, when the West Sax­on kings, Ead­ward and Æthel­stan, grad­ual­ly re­con­quered the Dan­ish North by inch­es at a time. The sec­ond is that of the Au­gus­tan age, when Dun­stan and Eadgar held to­geth­er the whole of Britain for a while in the hands of a sin­gle West Sax­on over-​lord. The third is that of the deca­dence, when, un­der Æthelred, the ill-​weld­ed em­pire fell asun­der, and the Dan­ish kings, Cnut, Harold, and Harthac­nut, ruled over all Eng­land, in­clud­ing even the un­con­quered Wes­sex of Æl­fred him­self.

At Æl­fred's death, his do­min­ions com­prised the larg­er Wes­sex, from Kent to the Cor­nish bor­der at Ex­eter, to­geth­er with the por­tion of Mer­cia south-​west of Watling Street. The for­mer king­dom passed in­to the hands of his son Ead­ward; the lat­ter was still held by the eal­dor­man Æthelred, who had mar­ried Æl­fred's daugh­ter Æthelflæd. The de­par­ture of the Dan­ish host, led by Hæsten, left the En­glish time to breathe and to re­cruit their strength. Hence­forth, for near­ly a cen­tu­ry, the di­rect wick­ing in­cur­sions cease, and the war is con­fined to a long strug­gle with the North­men al­ready set­tled in Eng­land. Four years lat­er, the east An­glian Danes broke the peace and har­ried Mer­cia and Wes­sex; but Ead­ward over­ran their lands in re­turn, and the Ken­tish men, in a sep­arate bat­tle, at­tacked and slew Er­ic their king with sev­er­al of his earls. In 912, Æthelred the Mer­cian died, and Ead­ward at once in­cor­po­rat­ed Lon­don and Ox­ford with his own do­min­ions, leav­ing his sis­ter Æthelflæd on­ly the north­ern half of her hus­band's prin­ci­pal­ity. Thence­forth Æthelflæd, “the La­dy of the Mer­cians,” turned de­lib­er­ate­ly to the con­quest of the North. She adopt­ed a fresh kind of tac­tics, which mark again a new de­par­ture in the En­glish pol­icy. In­stead of keep­ing to the old plan of al­ter­nate har­ry­ings on ei­ther side, and pre­car­ious tenure of lands from time to time, Æthelflæd be­gan build­ing reg­ular fortress­es or _burhs_ all along her north-​east­ern fron­tiers, us­ing these af­ter­wards as bases for fresh op­er­ations against the en­emy. The spade went hand in hand with the sword: the En­glish were be­com­ing en­gi­neers as well as fight­ers. In the year of her hus­band's death, the La­dy built _burhs_ at Sar­rat and Bridg­north. The next year “she went with all the Mer­cians to Tam­worth, and built the _burh_ there in ear­ly sum­mer; and ere Lam­mas, that at Stafford.” In the two suc­ceed­ing years she set up oth­er strongholds at Ed­des­bury, War­wick, Cher­bury, Ward­bury, and Run­corn. By 917, she found her­self strong enough to at­tack Der­by, one of the chief cities in the Dan­ish con­fed­er­acy of the Five Burgs, which she cap­tured af­ter a hard siege. Thence she turned on Le­ices­ter, which ca­pit­ulat­ed on her ap­proach, the Dan­ish host go­ing over qui­et­ly to her side. She was in com­mu­ni­ca­tion with the Danes of York for the sur­ren­der of that city, too, when she died sud­den­ly in her roy­al town of Tam­worth, in the year 918.

Mean­while Ead­ward had been push­ing for­ward his own bound­ary in the east, build­ing _burhs_ at Hert­ford and With­am, and en­deav­our­ing to sub­ju­gate the Dan­ish league in Bed­ford, Hunt­ing­don, and Northamp­ton. In 915, Thur­ke­tel, the jarl of Bed­ford, “sought him for lord,” and Ead­ward af­ter­wards built a _burh_ there al­so. On his sis­ter's death, he an­nexed all her ter­ri­to­ries, and then, in a fierce and long doubt­ful strug­gle, re­con­quered not on­ly Hunt­ing­don and Northamp­ton but East An­glia as well. The Chris­tian En­glish hailed him as a de­liv­er­er. Next, he turned on Stam­ford, the Dan­ish cap­ital of the Fens, and on Not­ting­ham, the stronghold of the Southum­bri­an host. In both towns he erect­ed _burhs_. These suc­cess­es once more placed the West Sax­on king in the fore­most po­si­tion amongst the many rulers of Britain. The small­er prin­ci­pal­ities, un­able to hold their own against the Scan­di­na­vians, be­gan spon­ta­neous­ly to ral­ly round Ead­ward as their lead­er and suzerain. In the same year with the con­quest of Stam­ford, “the kings of the North Welsh, How­el, and Cledauc, and Jeoth­wel, and all the North Welsh kin, sought him for lord.” In 923, Ead­ward pushed fur­ther north­ward, and sent a Mer­cian host to con­quer “Manch­ester in Northum­bria,” and for­ti­fy and man it. A line of twen­ty fortress­es now gir­dled the En­glish fron­tier, from Colch­ester, through Bed­ford and Not­ting­ham, to Manch­ester and Chester. Next year, Ead­ward him­self, now im­me­di­ate king of all Eng­land south of Hum­ber, at­tacked the last re­main­ing Dan­ish king­dom, Northum­bria, throw­ing a bridge across the Trent at Not­ting­ham, and march­ing against Bakewell in Peak­land, where again he built a _burh_. The new tac­tics were too fine for the rough and ready Dan­ish lead­ers. Be­fore Ead­ward reached York, the en­tire North sub­mit­ted with­out a blow. “The king of Scots, and all the Scot­tish kin, and Rag­nald [Dan­ish king of York], and the sons of Ead­ulf [En­glish kings of Bam­bor­ough], and all who dwell in Northum­bria, as well En­glish as Danes and North­men and oth­ers, and al­so the king of the Strath­clyde Welsh and all the Strath­clyde Welsh, sought him for fa­ther and for lord.” This was in 924. Next year, Ead­ward “rex in­vic­tus” died, over-​lord of all Britain from sea to sea, while the whole coun­try south of the Hum­ber, save on­ly Wales and Corn­wall, was now prac­ti­cal­ly unit­ed in­to a sin­gle king­dom of Eng­land.

But the seem­ing sub­mis­sion of the North was fal­la­cious. The Danes had rein­tro­duced in­to Britain a fresh mass of in­co­her­ent bar­barism, which could not thus read­ily co­alesce. The Scan­di­na­vian leav­en in the pop­ula­tion had put back the shad­ow on the di­al of Eng­land some three cen­turies. Æthel­stan, Ead­ward's son, found him­self obliged to give his sis­ter in mar­riage to Si­htric or Sigtrig, Dan­ish king of the York­shire Northum­bri­ans, which prob­ably marks a recog­ni­tion of his vas­sal's equal­ity. Soon af­ter, how­ev­er, Si­htric died, and Æthel­stan made him­self first king of all Eng­land by adding Northum­bria to his own im­me­di­ate do­min­ions. Then “he bowed to him­self all the kings who were in this is­land; first, How­el, king of the West Welsh; and Con­stan­tine, king of Scots; and Owen, king of Gwent [South Wales]; and Eal­dred, son of Eal­dulf of Bam­bor­ough; and with pledge and with oaths sware they peace, and for­sook ev­ery kind of hea­then­dom.” In the West, he drove the Welsh from Ex­eter, which they had till then oc­cu­pied in com­mon with the En­glish, and fixed their bound­ary at the Tamar. But once more the pre­tend­ed vas­sals re­belled. Con­stan­tine, king of Scots, threw off his al­le­giance, and Æthel­stan there­upon “went in­to Scot­land, both with a land host and a ship host, and har­ried a mick­le deal of it.” In 937, the feuda­to­ries made a fi­nal and unit­ed ef­fort to throw off the West Sax­on yoke. The Scots, the Strath­clyde Welsh, the peo­ple of Wales and Corn­wall, the lords of Bam­bor­ough, and the Danes through­out the North and East, all rose to­geth­er in a great league against their over-​lord. An­laf, king of the Dublin Danes, came over from Ire­land to aid them, with a large body of wick­ings. The con­fed­er­ates met the West Sax­on _fyrd_ or levy at an un­known spot named Brunan­burh, where Æthel­stan over­threw them in a crush­ing de­feat, which forms the sub­ject of a fine war-​song, in­sert­ed in full in the En­glish Chron­icle.[1] Three years lat­er Æthel­stan died, as his fa­ther had died be­fore him, undis­put­ed over-​lord of all Britain, and im­me­di­ate king of the whole Teu­ton­ic por­tion.

[1] See chap­ter xx.

Yet once more the fee­ble uni­ty of the coun­try broke hope­less­ly asun­der. Ead­mund, who suc­ceed­ed his broth­er, found the Danes of the North and the Mid­lands again in­sub­or­di­nate. The year af­ter his ac­ces­sion “the Northum­bri­ans be­lied their oath, and chose An­laf of Ire­land for king.” The Five Burgs went too, and the old bound­ary of Watling Street was once more made the fron­tier of the Dan­ish pos­ses­sions. In 944, how­ev­er, Ead­mund sub­dued all Northum­bria, and ex­pelled its Dan­ish kings. His re­cov­ery of the Five Burgs, and the joy of the Chris­tian En­glish in­hab­itants, are vivid­ly set forth in a frag­men­tary bal­lad em­bed­ded in the Chron­icle. The next year he har­ried Strath­clyde or Cum­ber­land, the Welsh king­dom be­tween Clyde and More­cambe, and hand­ed it over to Mal­colm, king of Scots, as a pledge of his fi­deli­ty. At Ead­mund's death in 946–when he was stabbed in his roy­al hall by an out­law–his king­dom fell to his broth­er Eadred. Two years lat­er Northum­bria again re­volt­ed, and chose Er­ic for its king. Eadred har­ried and burnt the province, which he then hand­ed over to an earl of his own cre­ation, one of the Bam­bor­ough fam­ily. The king him­self died in 955, and was suc­ceed­ed by his nephew Ead­wig. But Northum­bria and Mer­cia re­volt­ed once more, and chose Ead­wig's broth­er, Eadgar, in­stead of their own Dan­ish princes. Ead­wig died in 958, and Eadgar then be­came king of all three provinces; thus fi­nal­ly unit­ing the whole of Teu­ton­ic Eng­land in­to one king­dom.

Eadgar's reign forms the cli­max of the West Sax­on pow­er. It was, in fact, the on­ly pe­ri­od when Eng­land can be said to have en­joyed any na­tion­al uni­ty un­der the An­glo-​Sax­on dy­nas­ties. The strong hand of a priest gave peace for some years to the ill-​or­gan­ised mass. Dun­stan was prob­ably the first En­glish­man who se­ri­ous­ly de­serves the name of states­man. He was born in the half-​Celtic re­gion of Som­er­set, be­side the great abbey of Glas­ton­bury, which held the bones of Arthur, and a good deal of the imag­ina­tive Celtic tem­per ran prob­ably with the blood in his veins.[2] But he was above all the rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the Ro­man civil­isa­tion in the bar­barised, half-​Dan­ish Eng­land of the tenth cen­tu­ry. He was a mu­si­cian, a painter, a read­er, and a schol­ar, in a world of fierce war­riors and ig­no­rant no­bles. Ead­mund made him ab­bot of Glas­ton­bury. Eadgar ap­point­ed him first bish­op of Lon­don, and then, on Ead­wig's death, Arch­bish­op of Can­ter­bury. It was Dun­stan who re­al­ly ruled Eng­land through­out the re­main­der of his life. Es­sen­tial­ly an or­gan­is­er and ad­min­is­tra­tor, he was able to weld the un­wieldy em­pire in­to a rough uni­ty, which last­ed as long as its au­thor lived, and no longer. He ap­peased the dis­con­tent of Northum­bria and the Five Burgs by per­mit­ting them a cer­tain amount of lo­cal in­de­pen­dence, with the en­joy­ment of their own laws and their own law­men. He kept a fleet of boats cruis­ing in the Irish Sea to check the Dan­ish hosts at Dublin and Wa­ter­ford. He put for­ward a code, known as the laws of Eadgar, for the bet­ter gov­ern­ment of Wes­sex and the South. He made the over-​lord­ship of the West Sax­ons over their British vas­sals more re­al than it had ev­er been be­fore; and a tale, pre­served by Flo­rence, tells us that eight trib­utary kings rowed Eadgar in his roy­al barge on the Dee, in to­ken of their com­plete sub­jec­tion. In­ter­nal­ly, Dun­stan re­vived the de­clin­ing spir­it of monas­ti­cism, which had died down dur­ing the long strug­gle with the Danes, and at­tempt­ed to rein­tro­duce some tinge of south­ern civil­isa­tion in­to the bar­barised and half-​pa­gan­ised coun­try in which he lived. Wher­ev­er it was pos­si­ble, he “drove out the priests, and set monks,” and he en­deav­oured to make the monas­ter­ies, which had de­gen­er­at­ed dur­ing the long war in­to mere landown­ing com­mu­ni­ties, re­gain once more their old po­si­tion as cen­tres of cul­ture and learn­ing. Dur­ing his own time his ef­forts were suc­cess­ful, and even af­ter his death the move­ment which he had be­gun con­tin­ued in this di­rec­tion to make it­self felt, though in a fee­bler and less in­tel­li­gent form.

[2] It is im­pos­si­ble to avoid notic­ing the in­creased im­por­tance of se­mi-​Celtic Britain un­der Dun­stan's ad­min­is­tra­tion. He was him­self at first an ab­bot of the old West Welsh monastery of Glas­ton­bury: he pro­mot­ed West coun­try­men to the prin­ci­pal posts in the king­dom: and he had Eadgar hal­lowed king at the an­cient West Welsh roy­al city of Bath, mar­ried to a De­von­shire la­dy, and buried at Glas­ton­bury. In­deed, that monastery was un­der Dun­stan what West­min­ster was un­der the lat­er kings. Flo­rence us­es the strange ex­pres­sion that Eadgar was cho­sen “by the An­glo-​Britons:” and the meet­ing with the Welsh and Scotch princes in the se­mi-​Welsh town of Chester con­veys a like im­pli­ca­tion.

One act of Dun­stan's pol­icy, how­ev­er, had far-​reach­ing re­sults, of a kind which he him­self could nev­er have an­tic­ipat­ed. He hand­ed over all Northum­bria be­yond the Tweed–the re­gion now known as the Loth­ians–as a fief to Ken­neth, king of Scots. This ac­ces­sion of ter­ri­to­ry whol­ly changed the char­ac­ter of the Scot­tish king­dom, and large­ly pro­mot­ed the Teu­ton­isa­tion of the Celtic North. The Scot­tish princes now took up their res­idence in the En­glish town of Ed­in­burgh, and learned to speak the En­glish lan­guage as their moth­er-​tongue. Al­ready Ead­mund had made over Strath­clyde or Cum­ber­land to Mal­colm; and thus the do­min­ions of the Scot­tish kings ex­tend­ed over the whole of the coun­try now known as Scot­land, save on­ly the Scan­di­na­vian jarl­doms of Caith­ness, Suther­land, and the Isles. Strath­clyde rapid­ly adopt­ed the tongue of its mas­ters, and grew as En­glish in lan­guage (though not in blood) as the Loth­ians them­selves. Fife, in turn, was quick­ly An­gli­cised, as was al­so the whole re­gion south of the High­land line. Thus a new and pow­er­ful king­dom arose in the North; and at the same time the ces­sion of an En­glish dis­trict to the Scot­tish kings had the cu­ri­ous re­sult of thor­ough­ly An­gli­cis­ing two large and im­por­tant Celtic re­gions, which had hith­er­to re­sist­ed ev­ery ef­fort of the Northum­bri­an or West Sax­on over-​lords. There is no rea­son to be­lieve, how­ev­er, that this in­tro­duc­tion of the En­glish tongue and En­glish man­ners was con­nect­ed with any con­sid­er­able im­mi­gra­tion of Teu­ton­ic set­tlers in­to the An­gli­cised tracts. The pop­ula­tion of Ayr­shire, of Fife, of Perthshire, and of Ab­erdeen, still shows ev­ery sign of Celtic de­scent, alike in physique, in tem­per­ament, and in habit of thought. The change was, in all prob­abil­ity, ex­act­ly anal­ogous to that which we our­selves have seen tak­ing place in Wales, in Ire­land, and in the Celtic north of Scot­land at the present day.