Observations on the Mussulmauns of India by Ali, Mrs. Meer Hassan - Observations on the Mussulmauns of India

(download Open eBook Format)

Observations on the Mussulmauns of India

The Project Guten­berg eBook, Ob­ser­va­tions on the Mus­sul­mauns of In­dia, by Mrs. Meer Has­san Ali, et al, Edit­ed by W. Crooke

This eBook is for the use of any­one any­where at no cost and with al­most no re­stric­tions what­so­ev­er. You may copy it, give it away or re-​use it un­der the terms of the Project Guten­berg Li­cense in­clud­ed with this eBook or on­line at www.guten­berg.net

Ti­tle: Ob­ser­va­tions on the Mus­sul­mauns of In­dia

Au­thor: Mrs. Meer Has­san Ali

Re­lease Date: Au­gust 7, 2004 [eBook #13127]

Lan­guage: En­glish

Char­ac­ter set en­cod­ing: ISO-8859-1

***START OF THE PROJECT GUTEN­BERG EBOOK OB­SER­VA­TIONS ON THE MUS­SUL­MAUNS OF IN­DIA***

E-​text pre­pared by Allen Sid­dle and Project Guten­berg Dis­tribut­ed Proof­read­ers from im­ages pro­vid­ed by the Mil­lion Book Project

OB­SER­VA­TIONS ON THE MUS­SUL­MAUNS OF IN­DIA

De­scrip­tive of Their Man­ners, Cus­toms, Habits and Re­li­gious Opin­ions Made Dur­ing a Twelve Years' Res­idence in Their Im­me­di­ate So­ci­ety

by

MRS. MEER HAS­SAN ALI

Sec­ond Edi­tion, Edit­ed with Notes and an In­tro­duc­tion by W. Crooke

1917

WITH SEN­TI­MENTS OF GRAT­ITUDE AND PRO­FOUND RE­SPECT THE FOL­LOW­ING PAGES ARE HUMBLY DED­ICAT­ED, WITH PER­MIS­SION,

TO HER ROY­AL HIGH­NESS THE PRINCESS AU­GUS­TA;

BY HER ROY­AL HIGH­NESS'S MOST OBE­DI­ENT, FAITH­FUL­LY AT­TACHED, AND VERY HUM­BLE SER­VANT,

B. MEER HAS­SAN ALI.

[1832.]

PREF­ACE TO THE SEC­OND EDI­TION

In the present reprint the text of the orig­inal edi­tion of this work has been re­pro­duced with­out change, even the cu­ri­ous translit­er­ations of the ver­nac­ular words and phras­es hav­ing been pre­served. The cor­rect forms of these, so far as they have been as­cer­tained, have been giv­en in the Notes and in the In­dex-​Glos­sary. I have added an In­tro­duc­tion con­tain­ing an ac­count of the au­thoress based on the scanty in­for­ma­tion avail­able, and I have com­piled some notes il­lus­trat­ing ques­tions con­nect­ed with Is­lam and Musalman us­ages. I have not thought it nec­es­sary to give de­tailed ref­er­ences in the notes, but a list of the works which have been used will be found at the end of the text. As in oth­er vol­umes of this se­ries, the di­acrit­ical marks in­di­cat­ing the va­ri­eties of the sound of cer­tain let­ters in the Ara­bic and De­vana­gari al­pha­bets have not been giv­en: they are un­nec­es­sary for the schol­ar and serve on­ly to em­bar­rass the gen­er­al read­er.

I have to ac­knowl­edge help from sev­er­al friends in the prepa­ra­tion of this edi­tion. Mr. W. Fos­ter, C.I.E., has sup­plied valu­able notes from the In­dia Of­fice records on Mir Hasan 'Ali and his fam­ily; Dr. W. Hoey, late I.C.S., and Mr. L.N. Jopling, I.C.S., Deputy-​Com­mis­sion­er, Luc­know, have made in­quiries on the same sub­ject. Mr. H.C. Ir­win, late I.C.S., has fur­nished much in­for­ma­tion on Oudh af­fairs in the time of the Nawabi. Sir C.J. Lyall, K.C.S.I, C.I.E., and Pro­fes­sor E.G. Browne, M.A., have per­mit­ted me to con­sult them on cer­tain ob­scure words in the text.

W. CROOKE.

IN­TRO­DUC­TION

Very lit­tle is known about the au­thoress of this in­ter­est­ing book. She is ret­icent about the af­fairs of her hus­band and of her­self, and in­quiries re­cent­ly made at Luc­know, at the In­dia Of­fice, and in oth­er like­ly quar­ters in Eng­land, have added lit­tle to the scanty in­for­ma­tion we pos­sess about her.

The fam­ily of her hus­band claimed to be of Sayyid ori­gin, that is to say, to be de­scend­ed from the mar­tyrs, Hasan and Hu­sain, the sons of Fa­timah, daugh­ter of the Prophet, by her mar­riage with her cousin-​ger­man, 'Ali. The fa­ther-​in-​law of the au­thoress, Mir Ha­ji Shah, of whom she speaks with af­fec­tion and re­spect, was the son of the Qazi, or Muham­madan law-​of­fi­cer, of Lud­hi­ana, in the Pan­jab. Dur­ing his boy­hood the Pan­jab was ex­posed to raids by the Mahrat­tas and in­cur­sions of the Sikhs. He there­fore aban­doned his stud­ies, wan­dered about for a time, and fi­nal­ly took ser­vice with a cer­tain Ra­ja--where she does not tell us--who was then rais­ing a force in ex­pec­ta­tion of an at­tack by the Sikhs. He served in at least one cam­paign, and then, while still a young man, made a pil­grim­age thrice to Mec­ca and Ker­bela, which gained him the ti­tle of Ha­ji, or pil­grim. While he was in Ara­bia he fell short of funds, but he suc­ceed­ed in cur­ing the wife of a rich mer­chant who had long suf­fered from a se­ri­ous dis­ease. She pro­vid­ed him with mon­ey to con­tin­ue his jour­ney. He mar­ried un­der ro­man­tic cir­cum­stances an Arab girl named Fa­timah as his sec­ond wife, and then went to Luc­know, which, un­der the rule of the Nawabs, was the cen­tre in North­ern In­dia of the Shi'ah sect, to which he be­longed. Here he had an ex­cit­ing ad­ven­ture with a tiger dur­ing a hunt­ing par­ty, at which the Nawab, Shu­ja-​ud-​daula, was present. He is be­lieved to have held the post of Pesh­na­maz, or 'lead­er in prayer', in the house­hold of the eu­nuch, Al­mas 'Ali Khan, who is re­ferred to by the au­thoress.

His son was Mir Hasan 'Ali, the hus­band of the au­thoress. The tra­di­tion in Luc­know is that he quar­relled with his fa­ther and went to Cal­cut­ta, where he taught Ara­bic to some British of­fi­cers and gained a knowl­edge of En­glish. We next hear of him in Eng­land, when in May 1810 he was ap­point­ed as­sis­tant to the well-​known ori­en­tal schol­ar, John Shake­spear, pro­fes­sor of Hin­dus­tani at the Mil­itary Col­lege, Ad­dis­combe, from 1807 to 1830, au­thor of a dic­tio­nary of Hin­dus­tani and oth­er ed­uca­tion­al works. Men­tion is made of two cadets board­ing with Mir Hasan 'Ali, but it does not ap­pear from the records where he lived. Af­ter re­main­ing at the Col­lege for six years he re­signed his ap­point­ment on the ground of ill-​health, with the in­ten­tion of re­turn­ing to In­dia. He must have been an ef­fi­cient teach­er, be­cause, on his res­ig­na­tion, the East In­dia Com­pa­ny treat­ed him with lib­er­al­ity. He re­ceived a gift of £50 as a re­ward for his trans­la­tion of the Gospel of St. Matthew, and from the Court min­utes it ap­pears that on De­cem­ber 17, 1816, it was re­solved to grant him 100 guineas to pro­vide his pas­sage and £100 for equip­ment. Fur­ther, the Ben­gal Gov­ern­ment was in­struct­ed to fur­nish him on his ar­rival with means to reach his na­tive place, and to pay him a pen­sion of Rs. 100 _per mensem_ for the rest of his life.[1]

A tra­di­tion from Luc­know states that he was sent to Eng­land on a se­cret mis­sion, 'to ask the Home au­thor­ities to ac­cept a con­tract of Oudh di­rect from Nasir-​ud-​din Haidar, who was quite will­ing to re­mit the mon­ey of con­tract di­rect to Eng­land in­stead of set­tling the mat­ter with the British Res­ident at Luc­know'. It is not clear what this ex­act­ly means. It may be that the King of Oudh, think­ing that an­nex­ation was in­evitable, may have been in­clined to at­tempt to se­cure some pri­vate ar­range­ment with the East In­dia Com­pa­ny, un­der which he would re­main tit­ular sovereign, pay­ing a trib­ute di­rect to the au­thor­ities in Eng­land, and that he wished to con­duct these ne­go­ti­ations with­out the knowl­edge of the Res­ident at Luc­know. There does not seem to be in­de­pen­dent ev­idence of this mis­sion of Mir Hasan 'Ali, and we are told that it was, as might have been ex­pect­ed, un­suc­cess­ful.

No men­tion is made of his wife in the of­fi­cial records, and I have been un­able to trace her fam­ily name or the date and place of her mar­riage. Mir Hasan 'Ali and his wife sailed for Cal­cut­ta, and trav­elled to Luc­know via Pat­na. She tells lit­tle of her ca­reer in In­dia, save that she lived there for twelve years, pre­sum­ably from 1816 to 1828, and that eleven years of that time were spent in the house of her fa­ther-​in-​law at Luc­know. In the course of her book she gives on­ly one date, Septem­ber 18, 1825, when her hus­band held the post of Tah­sil­dar, or sub-​col­lec­tor of rev­enue, at Kanauj in the British dis­trict of Far­rukhabad. No records bear­ing on his ca­reer as a British of­fi­cial are forth­com­ing. An­oth­er Luc­know tra­di­tion states that on his ar­rival at the Court of Oudh from Eng­land he was, on the rec­om­men­da­tion of the Res­ident, ap­point­ed to a post in the King's ser­vice on a salary of Rs. 300 per an­num. Sub­se­quent­ly he fell in­to dis­grace and was obliged to re­tire to Far­rukhabad with the court eu­nuch, Nawab Mu'tamad-​ud-​daula, Agha Mir.

With the restora­tion of Agha Mir to pow­er, Hasan 'Ali re­turned to Luc­know, and was grant­ed a life pen­sion of Rs. 100 _per mensem_ for his ser­vices as Darogha at the Res­iden­cy, and in con­sid­er­ation of his ne­go­ti­ations be­tween the King and the British Gov­ern­ment or the East In­dia Com­pa­ny.

From the in­for­ma­tion col­lect­ed at Luc­know it ap­pears that he was known as Mir Lon­doni, 'the Lon­don gen­tle­man', and that he was ap­point­ed Safir, or At­taché, at the court of King Ghazi-​ud-​din Haidar, who con­ferred up­on him the ti­tle of Masla­ha-​ud-​daula, 'Coun­sel­lor of State'. By an­oth­er ac­count he held the post of Mir Mun­shi, head na­tive clerk or sec­re­tary to the British Res­ident.

One of the most in­flu­en­tial per­son­ages in the court of Oudh dur­ing this pe­ri­od was that stormy pe­trel of pol­itics, Nawab Hakim Mehn­di. He had been the right-​hand man of the Nawab Sa'adat Ali, and on the ac­ces­sion of his son Ghazi-​ud-​din Haidar in 1814 he was dis­missed on the ground that he had in­cit­ed the King to protest against in­ter­fer­ence in Oudh af­fairs by the Res­ident, Colonel Bail­lie. The King at the last mo­ment be­came fright­ened at the prospect of an open rup­ture with the Res­ident. Nawab Hakim Mehn­di was de­prived of all his pub­lic of­fices and of much of his prop­er­ty, and he was im­pris­oned for a time. On his re­lease he re­tired in­to British ter­ri­to­ry, and in 1824 he was liv­ing in mag­nif­icent style at Fate­hgarh. In that year Bish­op Heber vis­it­ed Luc­know and re­ceived a cour­te­ous let­ter from the Nawab invit­ing him to his house at Fate­hgarh. He gave the Bish­op an as­sur­ance 'that he had an En­glish house­keep­er, who knew per­fect­ly well how to do the hon­ours of his es­tab­lish­ment to gen­tle­men of her own na­tion. (She is, in fact, a sin­gu­lar fe­male, who be­came the wife of one of the Hin­dus­tani pro­fes­sors at Hert­ford, now the Hu­keem's de­wan,[2] and bears, I be­lieve, a very re­spectable char­ac­ter.)' The au­thoress makes no ref­er­ence to Hakim Mehn­di, nor to the fact that she and her hus­band were in his em­ploy­ment.

The cause of her fi­nal de­par­ture from In­dia is stat­ed by W. Knighton in a high­ly coloured sketch of court life in the days of King Nasir-​ud-​daula, _The Pri­vate Life of an East­ern King_, pub­lished in 1855. 'Mrs. Meer Has­san was an En­glish la­dy who mar­ried a Luc­know no­ble dur­ing a vis­it to Eng­land. She spent twelve years with him in In­dia, and did not al­low him to ex­er­cise a Moslem's priv­ilege of a plu­ral­ity of wives. Re­turn­ing to Eng­land af­ter­wards on ac­count of her health, she did not again re­join him.'[3] The jeal­ousy be­tween ri­val wives in a polyg­amous Musalman house­hold is no­to­ri­ous. 'A ri­val may be good, but her son nev­er: a ri­val even if she be made of dough is in­tol­er­able: the mal­ice of a ri­val is known to ev­ery­body: wife up­on wife and heart­burn­ings'--such are the com­mon proverbs which de­fine the sit­ua­tion. But if her sep­ara­tion from her hus­band was re­al­ly due to this cause, it is cu­ri­ous that in her book she notes as a mark of a good wife that she is tol­er­ant of such ar­range­ments. 'She re­ceives him [her hus­band] with undis­guised plea­sure, al­though she has just be­fore learned that an­oth­er mem­ber has been added to his well-​peo­pled harem. The good and for­bear­ing wife, by this line of con­duct, se­cures to her­self the con­fi­dence of her hus­band, who, feel­ing as­sured that the ami­able wom­an has an in­ter­est in his hap­pi­ness, will con­sult her and take her ad­vice in the do­mes­tic af­fairs of his chil­dren by oth­er wives, and even ar­range by her judge­ment all the set­tle­ments for their mar­riages, &c. He can speak of oth­er wives with­out re­straint--for she knows he has oth­ers--and her ed­uca­tion has taught her that they de­serve her re­spect in pro­por­tion as they con­tribute to her hus­band's hap­pi­ness.'[4]

It is cer­tain­ly no­tice­able that she says very lit­tle about her hus­band be­yond call­ing him in a con­ven­tion­al way 'an ex­cel­lent hus­band' and 'a du­ti­ful, af­fec­tion­ate son'. There is no in­di­ca­tion that her hus­band ac­com­pa­nied her on her un­dat­ed vis­it to Del­hi, when she was re­ceived in au­di­ence by the King, Ak­bar II, and the Queen, who were then liv­ing in a state of se­mi-​pover­ty. She tells us that they 'both ap­peared, and ex­pressed them­selves, high­ly grat­ified with the vis­it of an En­glish la­dy, who could ex­plain her­self in their lan­guage with­out em­bar­rass­ment, or the as­sis­tance of an in­ter­preter, and who was the more in­ter­est­ing to them from the cir­cum­stance of be­ing the wife of a Syaad'.[5]

From in­quiries made at Luc­know it has been as­cer­tained that Mir Hasan 'Ali had no chil­dren by his En­glish wife. By one or more na­tive wives he had three chil­dren: a daugh­ter, Fa­timah Begam, who mar­ried a cer­tain Mir Sher 'Ali, of which mar­riage one or more de­scen­dants are be­lieved to be alive; and two sons, Mir Sayyid 'Ali or Mi­ran Sahib, said to have served the British Gov­ern­ment as a Tah­sil­dar, whose grand­son is now liv­ing at Luc­know, and Mir Sayyid Hu­sain, who be­came a Risal­dar, or com­man­der of a troop, in one of the Oudh Ir­reg­ular Cav­al­ry Reg­iments. One of his de­scen­dants, Mir Agha 'Ali Sahib, pos­sess­es some land­ed prop­er­ty which was prob­ably ac­quired by the Risal­dar. Af­ter the an­nex­ation of Oudh Mir Hasan 'Ali is said to have been paid a pen­sion of Rs. 100 _per mensem_ till his death in 1863.

It is al­so wor­thy of re­mark that she care­ful­ly avoids any ref­er­ence to the palace in­trigues and mal­ad­min­is­tra­tion which pre­vailed in Oudh dur­ing the reigns of Ghazi-​ud-​din Haidar and Nasir-​ud-​din Haidar, who oc­cu­pied the throne dur­ing her res­idence at Luc­know. She makes a vague apol­ogy for the dis­or­ga­nized state of the coun­try: 'Acts of op­pres­sion may some­times oc­cur in Na­tive States with­out the knowl­edge even, and much less by the com­mand of, the Sovereign ruler, since the good or­der of the gov­ern­ment main­ly de­pends on the dis­po­si­tion of the Prime Min­is­ter for the time be­ing'[6]--a true re­mark, but no de­fence for the con­duct of the weak princes who did noth­ing to sup­press cor­rup­tion and save their sub­jects from op­pres­sion.

Lit­tle is known of the his­to­ry of Mrs. Mir Hasan 'Ali af­ter her ar­rival in Eng­land. It has been stat­ed that she was at­tached in some ca­pac­ity to the house­hold of the Princess Au­gus­ta, who died un­mar­ried on Septem­ber 22, 1840.[7] This is prob­able, be­cause the list of sub­scribers to her book is head­ed by Queen Ade­laide, the Princess Au­gus­ta, and oth­er ladies of the Roy­al Fam­ily. She must have been in good re­pute among An­glo-​In­di­ans, be­cause sev­er­al well-​known names ap­pear in the list: H.T. Cole­brooke, G.C. Haughton, Mor­daunt Rick­etts and his wife, and Colonel J. Tod.

The val­ue of the book rests on the fact that it is a record of the first-​hand ex­pe­ri­ences of an En­glish la­dy who oc­cu­pied the ex­cep­tion­al po­si­tion of mem­ber­ship of a Musalman fam­ily. She tells us noth­ing of her friends in Luc­know, but she had free ac­cess to the hous­es of re­spectable Sayyids, and thus gained am­ple fa­cil­ities for the study of the man­ners and cus­toms of Musalman fam­ilies. Much of her in­for­ma­tion on Is­lam was ob­tained from her hus­band and his fa­ther, both learned, trav­elled gen­tle­men, and by them she was treat­ed with a de­gree of tol­er­ation un­usu­al in a Shi'ah house­hold, this sect be­ing rigid and of­ten fa­nat­ical fol­low­ers of Is­lam. She was al­lowed to re­tain a firm be­lief in the Chris­tian re­li­gion, and she tells us that Mir Ha­ji Shah de­light­ed in con­vers­ing on re­li­gious top­ics, and that his hap­pi­est time was spent in the qui­et of night when his son trans­lat­ed to him the Bible as she read it.[8]

Her pic­ture of zenana life is ob­vi­ous­ly coloured by her frank ad­mi­ra­tion for the peo­ple amongst whom she lived, who treat­ed her with re­spect and con­sid­er­ation. It is thus to some ex­tent idyl­lic. At the same time, it may be ad­mit­ted that she was ex­cep­tion­al­ly for­tu­nate in her friends. Her sketch may be use­ful­ly com­pared with that of Mrs. Fan­ny Parks in her charm­ing book, _The Wan­der­ings of a Pil­grim in Search of the Pic­turesque_. Mrs. Parks had the ad­van­tage of hav­ing ac­quired a lit­er­ary knowl­edge of Hin­dus­tani, while Mrs. Mir Hasan 'Ali, to judge from the way in which she translit­er­ates na­tive words, can have been able to speak lit­tle more than a bro­ken pa­tois, knew lit­tle of gram­mar, and was prob­ably un­able to read or write the Ara­bic char­ac­ter. Colonel Gard­ner, who had wide and pe­cu­liar ex­pe­ri­ence, said to Mrs. Parks: 'Noth­ing can ex­ceed the quar­rels that go on in the zenana, or the com­plaints the begams make against each oth­er. A com­mon com­plaint is “Such a one has been prac­tis­ing witchcraft against me”. If the hus­band make a present to one wife, if it be on­ly a bas­ket of man­goes, he must make the same ex­act­ly to all the oth­er wives to keep the peace. A wife, when in a rage with her hus­band, if on ac­count of jeal­ousy, of­ten says, “I wish I were mar­ried to a grass-​cut­ter,” i.e. be­cause a grass-​cut­ter is so poor that he can on­ly af­ford to have one wife.'[9] Mrs. Parks from her own ex­pe­ri­ence calls the zenana 'a place of in­trigue, and those who live with­in four walls can­not pur­sue a straight path; how can it be oth­er­wise, when so many con­flict­ing pas­sions are called forth?'[10] She adds that 'Musalmani ladies gen­er­al­ly for­get their learn­ing when they grow up, or they ne­glect it. Ev­ery­thing that pass­es with­out the four walls is re­peat­ed to them by their spies; nev­er was any place so full of in­trigue, scan­dal, and chit-​chat as a zenana.'[11] When she vis­it­ed the Del­hi palace she re­marks: 'As for beau­ty, in a whole zenana there may be two or three hand­some wom­en, and all the rest re­mark­ably ug­ly.'[12] Eu­ro­pean of­fi­cers at the present day have no op­por­tu­ni­ties for ac­quir­ing a knowl­edge of the con­di­tions of zenana life; but from the ru­mours that reach them they would prob­ably ac­cept the views of Mrs. Parks in pref­er­ence to those of Mrs. Mir Hasan 'Ali.

Though her opin­ions on the life of Musalman ladies is to some ex­tent open to crit­icism, and must be tak­en to ap­ply on­ly to the ex­cep­tion­al so­ci­ety in which she moved, her ac­count of the re­li­gious feasts and fasts, the de­scrip­tion of the mar­riage cer­emonies and that of the sur­round­ings of a na­tive house­hold are trust­wor­thy and valu­able. Some er­rors, not of much im­por­tance and prob­ably large­ly due to her im­per­fect knowl­edge of the lan­guage, have been cor­rect­ed in the notes of the present edi­tion. It must al­so be un­der­stood that her knowl­edge of na­tive life was con­fined to that of the Musalmans, and she dis­plays no ac­cu­rate ac­quain­tance with the re­li­gion, life or cus­toms of the Hin­dus. The ac­count in the text dis­plays a bias in favour of the Shi'ah sect of Musalmans, as con­trast­ed with that of the Sun­nis. For a more im­par­tial study of the ques­tion the read­er is re­ferred to Sir W. Muir, _An­nals of the Ear­ly Caliphate, The Caliphate_, and to Ma­jor R.D. Os­born, _Is­lam un­der the Khal­ifs of Bagh­dad_.

[1] Col. H.M. Vibart, _Ad­dis­combe_, pp. 39, 41, 42.

[2] _Di­wan_, chief agent, man­ag­er.

[3] p. 208.

[4] p. 182.

[5] p. 290.

[6] p. 227.

[7] _Cal­cut­ta Re­view_, ii. 387.

[8] pp. 80, 422.

[9] Vol. i, pp. 230, 453.

[10] i. 391.

[11] i. 450.

[12] ii. 215.

CON­TENTS

IN­TRO­DUC­TO­RY LET­TER

LET­TER I

In­tro­duc­to­ry Re­marks.--The char­ac­ter­is­tic sim­plic­ity of man­ners ex­hib­it­ed in Na­tive fam­ilies.--Their mu­nif­icent char­ity.--The Syaads. Their de­scent, and the ven­er­ation paid to them.--Their pride of birth.--Fast of Mahur­rum.--Its ori­gin.--The Sheahs and Soonies.--Mem­oran­dum of dis­tances.--Mount Judee (Judea), the at­tribut­ed bury­ing-​place of Adam and Noah.--Mau­soleum of Ali.--Tomb of Eve.--Meer Had­jee Shah.

LET­TER II

Cel­ebra­tion of Mahur­rum.--The Tazia.--Mus­sul­maun Ceme­ter­ies.--An Emaum-​baarah.--Piety of the ladies.--Self-​in­flict­ed ab­sti­nence and pri­va­tions en­dured by each sex.--In­stances of the de­vo­tion­al zeal of the Mus­sul­mauns.--At­tempt­ed in­fringe­ment on their re­li­gious for­mal­ities.--The Res­ident at Luc­know.--En­thu­si­as­tic ar­dour of the poor.--Man­ner of cel­ebrat­ing the Mahur­rum in op­po­si­tion to the pre­cepts of the Kho­raun.--Mosque and Emaum-​baarah con­trast­ed.--The sup­po­si­tion of Mus­sul­mauns prac­tis­ing idol­atry con­fut­ed.

LET­TER III

Con­tin­ua­tion of Mahur­rum.--Con­se­cra­tion of Ban­ners.--Dur­gah at Luc­know.--Its ori­gin ex­plained.--Re­gard­ed with pe­cu­liar ven­er­ation.--The Nuwaub vows to build a new one.--Its de­scrip­tion.--Pro­ces­sion to the Dur­gah.--Na­joomies.--In­flu­ence pos­sessed and prac­tised by them.--Eu­nuchs.--Anec­dotes of some hav­ing at­tained great hon­ours and wealth.--Presents be­stowed up­on them gen­er­al­ly re­vert to the donor.--Rich at­tire of male and fe­male slaves...Page 32

LET­TER IV

Mahur­rum con­clud­ed.--Night of Mayn­dhie.--Emaum-​baarah of the King of Oude.--Pro­ces­sion to Shaah Nudghiff.--Last day of Mahur­rum.--Chat­tahs.--Mu­si­cal in­stru­ments.--Zeal of the Na­tive gen­tle­men.--Fu­ner­al ob­se­quies over the Tazia at Kraabaal­lah.--Sen­ti­ments of de­vout Mus­sul­mauns.--The fast fol­lowed by acts of char­ity.--Re­marks on the ob­ser­vance of Mahur­rum...Page 42

LET­TER V

Time.--How di­vid­ed in Hin­doost­aun.--Ob­ser­vances af­ter Mahur­rum--Lux­uries and en­joy­ments re­sumed.--Black dye used by the ladies.--Their nose-​ring.--Num­ber of rings worn in their ears.--Mode of dress­ing their hair.--Aver­sion to our tooth-​brush­es.--Toi­let of the ladies.--The Py­jaamahs.--The Ungeeah (bodice).--The Courtie.--The Deput­tah.--Re­cep­tion of a su­pe­ri­or or el­der amongst the ladies.--Their fond­ness for jew­els.--Their shoes.--The state of so­ci­ety amongst the Mus­sul­maun ladies.--Their con­ver­sa­tion­al en­dow­ments.--Re­mark up­on the fash­ion and du­ty of beards...Page 55

LET­TER VI

The Mus­sul­maun re­li­gion.--Sec­tar­ians.--Their dif­fer­ence of faith.--His­to­ry of the Soonies.--The Caliphas Omir, Os­man, Aboubuk­er, &c.--Mahu­mud's part­ing charge to Ali.--Omir's jeal­ousy of Ali.--The Kho­raun.--How com­piled.--The Calipha Omir held in de­tes­ta­tion.--Creed of the Sheahs.--Fu­ner­al ser­vice.--Opin­ions of the Mus­sul­mauns re­spect­ing the Mil­len­ni­um.--The foun­da­tion of their faith ex­hib­it­ed.--Sen­ti­ments of the most de­vout fol­low­ers of Mahu­mud.--Bridge of Sir­raat, the Scales, &c., ex­plained.--Emaum Mhid­hie.--Prophe­cy of his reap­pear­ance.--Its ear­ly ful­fil­ment an­tic­ipat­ed.--Dis­course with Meer Had­jee Shaah on this sub­ject...Page 66

LET­TER VII

Na­maaz (dai­ly prayer).--The Mus­sul­maun prayers.--Their dif­fer­ent names and times.--Ex­tra prayer-​ser­vice.--The Mosque.--Ablu­tions req­ui­site pre­vi­ous to de­vo­tion.--Pros­tra­tions at prayers.--Mosque de­scribed.--The Mus­sul­maun's Sab­bath.--Its par­tial ob­ser­vance.--The amuse­ments of this life not dis­con­tin­ued on the Sab­bath.--Em­ploy­ment of do­mes­tics undi­min­ished on this day.--Works of im­por­tance then com­menced.--Rea­sons for ap­pro­pri­at­ing Fri­day to the Sab­bath.--The Jews op­posed to Mahu­mud.--The Prophet re­ceives in­struc­tions from the an­gel Gabriel.--Their im­port and def­ini­tion.--Re­marks of a Com­men­ta­tor on the Kho­raun.--Prayer of in­ter­ces­sion.--Pi­ous ob­ser­vance of Christ­mas day by a Na­tive La­dy.--Opin­ions en­ter­tained of our Saviour.--Ad­di­tion­al mo­tives for prayer.--David's Moth­er's prayer.--Anec­dote of Moses and a Wood­cut­ter.--Re­marks up­on the piety and de­vo­tion of the fe­male Mus­sul­mauns...Page 82

LET­TER VI­II

The Fast of Rumza­un.--Mo­tives for its strict ob­ser­vance.--Its com­mence­ment and du­ra­tion.--Sen­ti­ments of Meer Had­jee Shaah on the day of fast­ing.--Ad­her­ence of the fe­males to the ob­serv­ing this fast.--How first bro­ken.--De­vout per­sons ex­tend the term to forty days.--Chil­dren per­mit­ted to try their zeal.--Calami­tous ef­fects of the ex­per­iment.--Ex­emp­tions from this du­ty.--Joy­ful ter­mi­na­tion of the fast.--Cel­ebra­tion of Eade on the last day.--The Nuz­za.--Nautch­wom­en and Dome­nie.--Sur­prise of the Na­tives at Eu­ro­pean danc­ing.--Re­marks on their Mu­sic.--Anec­dotes of Fa­ti­ma.--The Chuc­kee...Page 98

LET­TER IX

The Had­je (Pil­grim­age to Mec­ca).--Com­mand­ed to be per­formed by Mahu­mud.--Ea­ger­ness of both, sex­es to vis­it the Prophet's tomb.--Qual­ifi­ca­tions req­ui­site for the un­der­tak­ing.--Dif­fer­ent routes from In­dia to Mec­ca.--Du­ties of the pil­grims at the Holy House.--Mec­ca and its en­vi­rons.--Place of Abra­ham.--The Bedouins.--Anec­dote of a devo­tee and two pil­grims.--A Bedouin Arab and the trav­ellers to Mec­ca.--The Kaabah (Holy House).--Su­per­sti­tious re­gard to a chain sus­pend­ed there.--Ac­count of the gold wa­ter-​spout.--Tax levied on pil­grims vis­it­ing the tomb of Mahu­mud by the Sheruff of Mec­ca.--Sa­cred vis­it to the tombs of Ali, Hasan, and Ho­sein.--The im­por­tance at­tached to this du­ty.--Trav­ellers an­noyed by the Arabs.--An in­stance record­ed.--The Nudghiff Usheruff.--Anec­dotes of Syaad Harshim...Page 112

LET­TER X

The Zuck­haut (God's por­tion).--Syaads re­strict­ed the ben­efit of this char­ity.--The Sutkah.--The Emaum's Za­umunee (pro­tec­tion).--The Tenths, or Syaads' Due.--Mus­sul­mauns at­tribute thanks to God on­ly, for all ben­efits con­ferred.--Ex­tracts from the 'Hyaa­tool Kaaloob'.--Mahu­mud's ad­vice.--His pre­cepts tend to in­cul­cate and en­cour­age char­ity.--Re­marks on the benev­olence of Mus­sul­mauns...Page 135

LET­TER XI

Mus­sul­maun fes­ti­vals.--Buck­rah Eade.--Ish­mael be­lieved to have been of­fered in sac­ri­fice by Abra­ham and not Isaac.--De­scent of the Mus­sul­mauns from Abra­ham.--The Eade-​gaarh.--Pre­sen­ta­tion of Nuz­zas.--Ele­phants.--De­scrip­tion of the Khillaut (robe of hon­our).--Cus­toms on the day of Buck­rah Eade.--Nou-​Roze (New Year's Day).--Man­ner of its cel­ebra­tion.--The Bus­sund (Spring-​colour).--The Sah-​bund.--Ob­ser­vances dur­ing this month.--Fes­ti­val of the New Moon.--Su­per­sti­tion of the Na­tives re­spect­ing the in­flu­ence of the Moon.--Their prac­tices dur­ing an eclipse.--Sup­posed ef­fects of the Moon on a wound.--Medic­inal ap­pli­ca­tion of lime in Hin­doost­aun.--Ob­ser­vance of Shubh-​bur­raat.

LET­TER XII

The Zeenah­nah.--Its in­te­ri­or de­scribed.--Fur­ni­ture, dec­ora­tions, &c.--The Pur­dah (cur­tains).--Bed­stead.--The Mus­nud (seat of hon­our).--Mir­rors and or­na­men­tal fur­ni­ture dis­used.--Dis­play on oc­ca­sions of fes­tiv­ity.--Ob­ser­va­tions on the Mus­sul­maun Ladies.--Hap­pi­ness in their state of seclu­sion.--Ori­gin of se­clud­ing fe­males by Mahu­mud.--Anec­dote.--Tamer­lane's com­mand pro­hibit­ing fe­males be­ing seen in pub­lic.--The Palan­keen.--Bear­ers.--Their gen­er­al util­ity and con­tent­ed­ness of dis­po­si­tion.--Habits pe­cu­liar to Mus­sul­maun Ladies.--Do­mes­tic ar­range­ments of a Zeenah­nah.--Din­ner and its ac­com­pa­ny­ing ob­ser­vances.--The Lota and Lug­guns.--The Hookha.--Fur­ther in­ves­ti­ga­tion of the cus­toms adopt­ed in Zeenah­nahs...Page 163

LET­TER XI­II

Plu­ral­ity of wives.--Mahu­mud's mo­tive for per­mit­ting this priv­ilege.--State of so­ci­ety at the com­mence­ment of the Prophet's mis­sion.--His in­junc­tions re­spect­ing mar­riage.--Par­ents in­vari­ably de­ter­mine on the se­lec­tion of a hus­band.--First mar­riages at­tend­ed by a pub­lic cer­emo­ny.--The first wife takes prece­dence of all oth­ers.--Gen­eros­ity of dis­po­si­tion evinced by the Mus­sul­maun ladies.--Di­vorces ob­tained un­der cer­tain re­stric­tions.--Pe­ri­od of sol­em­niz­ing mar­riage.--Method adopt­ed in choos­ing a hus­band or wife.--Over­tures and con­tracts of mar­riage, how reg­ulat­ed.--Mug­ga­nee, the first con­tract.--Dress of the bride elect on this oc­ca­sion.--The cer­emonies de­scribed as wit­nessed.--Re­marks on the bride.--Present from the bride­groom on Buck­rah Eade... Page 179

LET­TER XIV

Wed­ding cer­emonies of the Mus­sul­mauns.--The new or full moon pro­pi­tious to the rites be­ing con­clud­ed.--Mar­riage set­tle­ments un­known.--Con­trol of the wife over her own prop­er­ty.--Three days and nights oc­cu­pied in cel­ebrat­ing the wed­ding.--Prepa­ra­tions pre­vi­ous­ly made by both fam­ilies.--Os­ten­ta­tious dis­play on these oc­ca­sions.--Day of Sarchuck.--Cus­toms on the day of Mayn­dhie.--Send­ing Presents.--Day of Baar­raat.--Pro­ces­sion of the bride­groom to fetch the bride.--The bride's de­par­ture to her new home.--At­ten­dant cer­emonies ex­plained.--Sim­ilar­ity of the Mus­sul­maun and Hin­doo cer­emonies.--Anec­dote of a Mool­lah.--Ty­ing the Nar­rah to the Moosul...Page 195

LET­TER XV

On the birth and man­age­ment of chil­dren in Hin­doost­aun.--In­crease of joy on the birth of a Son.--Pref­er­ence gen­er­al­ly shown to male chil­dren.--Treat­ment of In­fants.--Day of Pu­rifi­ca­tion.--Of­fer­ings pre­sent­ed on this oc­ca­sion to the child.--The an­niver­sary of the birth­day cel­ebrat­ed.--Vis­it of the fa­ther to the Dur­gah.--Pas­times of boys.--Kites.--Pi­geons.--The Mhogdhur.--Sword-​ex­er­cise.--The Bow and Ar­rows.--The Pel­let-​bow.--Crows.--Sports of Na­tive gen­tle­men.--Cock-​fight­ing.--Re­marks up­on hors­es, ele­phants, tigers, and leop­ards.--Pi­geon-​shoot­ing.--Birds re­leased from cap­tiv­ity on par­tic­ular oc­ca­sions.--Rea­sons for the ex­ten­sion of the roy­al clemen­cy in Na­tive Courts.--In­flu­ence of the Prime Min­is­ter in the ad­min­is­tra­tion of jus­tice...Page 210

LET­TER XVI

Re­marks on the trades and pro­fes­sions of Hin­doost­aun.--The Bazaars.--Naun­bye (Bazaar cook).--The Butch­er, and oth­er trades.--Shroffs (Mon­ey-​chang­ers).--Pop­ular cries in Na­tive cities.--The ar­ti­cles enu­mer­at­ed and the venders of them de­scribed.--The Cup­pers.--Leech­wom­en.--Ear-​clean­ers.--Old sil­ver.--Pick­les.--Con­fec­tionery.--Toys.--Fans.--Veg­eta­bles and fruit.--Man­goes.--Mel­ons.--Mel­on-​cy­der.--Fish.--Bird-​catch­er.--The Butch­er-​bird, the Coel, and Lol­lah.--Fire­works.--Parched corn.--Won­der-​work­ers.--Snakes.--Anec­dote of the Moon­shie and the Snake-​catch­er.--The Cut­ler.--Sour curds.--Clot­ted cream.--But­ter.--Sin­gu­lar pro­cess of the Na­tives in mak­ing but­ter.--Ice.--How pro­cured in In­dia.--Ink.--All writ­ing ded­icat­ed to God by the Mus­sul­mauns.--The rev­er­ence for the name of God.--The Mayn­dhie and Sul­mah...Page 228

LET­TER XVII

Seclu­sion of Fe­males.--Paad­shah Be­gum.--The Suwaar­ree.--Fe­male Bear­ers.--Eu­nuchs.--Rutts.--Par­tial­ity of the Ladies to Large ret­inues.--Fe­male Com­pan­ions.--Telling the Khau­nie.--Games of the Zeenah­nah.--Sham­poo­ing.--The Punkah.--Slaves and slav­ery.--Anec­dote.--The Per­sian Po­ets.--Fier­dowsee.--Saadie, his 'Goolis­taun'.--Haafiz.--Mahu­mud Baarkur.--'Hyaa­tool Kaaloob'.--Dif­fer­ent man­ner of pro­nounc­ing Scrip­ture names...Page 248

LET­TER XVI­II

Evils at­tend­ing a res­idence in In­dia.--Frogs.--Flies.--Blains.-- Musquitoes.--The White Ant.--The Red Ant.--Their de­struc­tive habits.--A Taran­tu­la.--Black Ants.--Lo­custs.--Su­per­sti­tion of the Na­tives up­on their ap­pear­ance.--The Tu­faun, or Haun­dhie (tem­pest).--The rainy sea­son.--Thun­der and light­ning.--Me­te­ors.-- Earth­quakes.--A city ru­ined by them.--Rev­er­ence of the Mus­sul­mauns for saints.--Prick­ly heat.--Cholera Mor­bus.--Mode of Treat­ment.--Tem­per­ance the best rem­edy.--Recipe...Page 258

LET­TER XIX

Kannoge.--For­mer­ly the cap­ital of Hin­doost­aun.--An­cient cas­tle.--Dura­bil­ity of the bricks made by the abo­rig­ines.--Prospect from the Kil­laah (cas­tle).--Ru­ins.--Trea­sures found there­in.--The Dur­gah Baallee Peer Kee.--Mukhbur­rahs.--An­cient Mosque.--Sin­gu­lar struc­ture of some stone pil­lars.--The Dur­gah Muk­doom Jhaunneer.--Con­ver­sions to the Mus­sul­maun Faith.--Anec­dote.--Ig­no­rance of the Hin­doos.--Sculp­ture of the An­cients.--Mosque in­hab­it­ed by thieves.--Dis­cov­ery of Ni­tre.--Method of ex­tract­ing it.--Con­jec­tures of its pro­duce.--Res­idence in the cas­tle.--Re­flec­tions...Page 274

LET­TER XX

Del­hi.--De­scrip­tion of the city.--Mar­ble hall--The Queen's Mahul (palace).--Au­di­ence with the King and Queen.--Con­ver­sa­tion with them.--Char­ac­ter of their Majesties.--Vis­it to a Muck­bur­rah.--Soobad­haars.--The na­ture of the of­fice.--Dur­gah of Shah Niza­am ood deen.--Tomb of Shah Al­lum.--Ru­ins in the vicin­ity of Del­hi. --An­tique pil­lars (Kootub).--Prospect from its gal­leries.--Anec­dotes of Juangheer and Kha­reem Zund...Page 289

LET­TER XXI

Nat­ural Pro­duc­tions of In­dia.--Trees, shrubs, plants, fruits, &c.--Their dif­fer­ent us­es and medic­inal qual­ities.--The Rose.--Na­tive med­ical prac­tice.--An­ti­dote to Hy­dropho­bia.--Rem­edy for the ven­om of the Snake.--The Chitcher­ah (In­vert­ed thorn).--The Neam-​tree.--The Hur­rundh (Cas­tor-​tree).--The Umul­tass (Cas­sia-​tree).--The Myr­tle.--The Pomegranate.--The Tamarind.--The Jah­mun.--The Man­go.--The Sher­refah.--White and red Guavers.--The Dam­as­cus Fig.--The Peach, and oth­er Fruits.--The Mahd­haar (Fire-​plant).--The Sir­ra­kee and Sain­turh (Jun­gle-​grass).--The Bam­boo, and its var­ious us­es enu­mer­at­ed...Page 304

LET­TER XXII

Mon­keys.--Hin­doo opin­ions of their Na­ture.--In­stances of their sagac­ity.--Root­ed an­imos­ity of the Mon­key tribe to the snake.--Cru­el­ty to each oth­er when maimed.--The fe­male re­mark­able for af­fec­tion to its young.--Anec­dotes de­scrip­tive of the be­lief of the Na­tives in the Mon­key be­ing en­dowed with rea­son.--The Mon­keys and the Al­li­ga­tor.--The Trav­eller and the Mon­keys.--The Hin­doo and the Mon­key...Page 324

LET­TER XXI­II

The Soofies.--Opin­ion of the Mus­sul­mauns con­cern­ing Solomon.--The Ood-​ood.--De­scrip­tion of the Soofies and their sect.--Re­gard­ed with great rev­er­ence.--Their pro­tract­ed fasts.--Their opin­ion es­teemed by the Na­tives.--In­stance of the truth of their pre­dic­tions.--The Saa­lik and Ma­joob Soofies.--The po­ets Haafiz and Saadie.--Char­ac­ter and at­tain­ments of Saadie.--His 'Goolis­taun'.--Anec­dotes de­scrip­tive of the ori­gin of that work.--Far­ther re­marks on the char­ac­ter and his­to­ry of Saadie.--In­ter­est­ing anec­dotes il­lus­tra­tive of his virtues and the dis­tin­guish­ing char­ac­ter­is­tics of the Soofies...Page 331

LET­TER XXIV

The Soofies con­tin­ued.--Eloy Bauxh.--As­sem­bly of Saa­lik Soofies.--Sin­gu­lar ex­hi­bi­tion of their zeal.--Mys­tery of Soofeism.--The terms Soofie and Dur­weish ex­plained.--Anec­dote of Shah Sherif.--Shah Jee and the Pal­taan.--Di­alogue on death be­tween Shah Jee and his wife.--Ex­em­plary life of his grand­son.--Anec­dote of a Mus­sul­maun la­dy.--Re­flec­tions on mod­ern Hin­doos.--Anec­dotes of Shah ood Dowlah and Meer Niza­am...Page 348

LET­TER XXV

Mus­sul­maun Devo­tees.--The Chillub­dhaars.--Pe­cu­liar mode of wor­ship.--Pro­pi­tia­to­ry of­fer­ings.--Sup­posed to be in­vul­ner­able to fire.--The Maad­haars or Duf­felees.--Char­ac­ter of the founder.--Pil­grim­age to his tomb.--Fe­males af­flict­ed on vis­it­ing it.--Ef­fects at­tribut­ed to the vi­ola­tion of the sanc­tu­ary by a for­eign­er.--Su­per­sti­tion of the Na­tives.--Anec­dote of Sheikh Sud­doo and the Genii.--The way of the world ex­em­pli­fied, a Khau­nie (Hin­doost­au­nie fa­ble).--Moral fa­ble.--The King who longed for fruit...Page 370

LET­TER XXVI

Su­per­sti­tion of the Na­tives.--Fair an­nu­al­ly kept by Hin­doos.--Sup­posed prac­tice of witchcraft by an old wom­an.--As­sault­ed by an in­fu­ri­at­ed pop­ulace.--Res­cued by a Na­tive gen­tle­man.--He in­quires their rea­sons for per­se­cut­ing her.--Is in­stru­men­tal in ap­peas­ing their ma­lig­ni­ty.--En­deav­ours to re­move their prej­udice.--Prone­ness of Asi­at­ics to su­per­sti­tion.--Opin­ion of a Mus­sul­maun on the in­flu­ence of evil spir­its.--Ac­count of a wom­an pos­sessed by an evil spir­it.--Di­alogue with her dur­ing the parox­ysms of her af­flic­tion.--Means used for her re­cov­ery.--Fur­ther al­lu­sions to the false no­tions of the Na­tives re­spect­ing su­per­nat­ural agen­cy...Page 387

LET­TER XXVII

Mem­oir of the life of Meer Had­jee Shah.--His de­scent.--Anec­dote of a youth­ful ex­ploit.--His predilec­tion for the army.--Leaves his home to join the army of a neigh­bour­ing Ra­jah.--Ad­ven­tures on the way.--Is favourably re­ceived and fos­tered by the Ra­jah.--His first pil­grim­age to Mec­ca.--Oc­cur­rences dur­ing his stay in Ara­bia.--De­scrip­tion of a tiger-​hunt.--De­tail of events dur­ing his sub­se­quent pil­grim­ages.--The plague.--Seizure by pi­rates.--Sketch of the life of Fa­ti­ma, an Ara­bi­an la­dy.--Re­lieved from slav­ery by Meer Had­jee Shah.--He mar­ries her.--Ob­ser­va­tions on the piety of his life.--Con­clud­ing re­marks...Page 400

IN­DEX...Page 427

IN­TRO­DUC­TO­RY LET­TER

Ac­tu­at­ed by a sense of du­ty to the peo­ple with whom twelve years of my life were passed on terms of in­ti­ma­cy and kind­ness, I was in­duced to write the prin­ci­pal num­ber of the fol­low­ing Let­ters as faith­ful sketch­es of the Man­ners, Cus­toms, and Habits of a peo­ple but lit­tle known to the Eu­ro­pean read­er. They were at first de­signed mere­ly for the pe­rusal of pri­vate friends; who, view­ing them with in­ter­est, rec­om­mend­ed my bring­ing them be­fore the pub­lic, con­sid­er­ing that the in­for­ma­tion they con­tained would be ac­cept­able from its orig­inal­ity, as pre­sent­ing a more fa­mil­iar view of the opin­ions and the do­mes­tic habits of the Mus­sul­maun com­mu­ni­ty of Hin­doost­aun than any hith­er­to pre­sent­ed through oth­er chan­nels.

I have found (and I be­lieve many will co­in­cide with me in the opin­ion) that it is far eas­ier to think with pro­pri­ety than to write our thoughts with per­spicu­ity and cor­rect­ness; but when the ob­ject in view is one which con­science dic­tates, the hum­blest ef­fort of a fe­male pen ad­vances with courage; and thus in­flu­enced, I ven­ture to present my work to the pub­lic, re­spect­ful­ly trust­ing they will ex­tend their usu­al in­dul­gence to a first at­tempt, from the pen of a very hum­ble scribe, more so­lic­itous for ap­pro­ba­tion than ap­plause.

The or­thog­ra­phy of Asi­at­ic words may dif­fer in some in­stances in my pages from those of oth­er writ­ers--this, how­ev­er, is from er­ror, not de­sign, and may be just­ly at­tribut­ed to my own faulty pro­nun­ci­ation.

I have in­sert­ed in these Let­ters many anec­dotes and fa­bles, which at the first view, may be con­sid­ered as mere nurs­ery tales. My ob­ject, how­ev­er, will I trust plead my ex­cuse: they are in­tro­duced in or­der to il­lus­trate the peo­ple whom I have un­der­tak­en to de­scribe; and, pri­mar­ily strength­ened by the moral ten­den­cy of each anec­dote or fa­ble se­lect­ed for my pages, I can­not but con­sid­er them as well suit­ed to the pur­pose.

With­out far­ther apol­ogy, but with very great def­er­ence, I leave these im­per­fect at­tempts to the lib­er­al­ity of my read­ers, ac­knowl­edg­ing with grat­itude the con­de­scend­ing pa­tron­age I have been hon­oured with, and sin­cere­ly de­sir­ing wher­ev­er an­tic­ipa­tions of amuse­ment or in­for­ma­tion from my ob­ser­va­tions have been formed, that the fol­low­ing pages may ful­fil those ex­pec­ta­tions, and thus grat­ify my wish to be in the small­est de­gree use­ful in my gen­er­ation.

[B. MEER HAS­SAN ALI]

OB­SER­VA­TIONS, ETC.