PC Magazine: “Stanza is the best e-book reader for the iPhone, and my favorite.”
21 Cool iPhone Apps - Stanza

The Education of Henry Adams by Adams, Henry - CHAPTER III

(download Open eBook Format)

The Education of Henry Adams

CHAPTER III

WASH­ING­TON (1850-1854)

EX­CEPT for pol­itics, Mount Ver­non Street had the mer­it of leav­ing the boy-​mind sup­ple, free to turn with the world, and if one learned next to noth­ing, the lit­tle one did learn need­ed not to be un­learned. The sur­face was ready to take any form that ed­uca­tion should cut in­to it, though Boston, with sin­gu­lar fore­sight, re­ject­ed the old de­signs. What sort of ed­uca­tion was stamped else­where, a Bosto­ni­an had no idea, but he es­caped the evils of oth­er stan­dards by hav­ing no stan­dard at all; and what was true of school was true of so­ci­ety. Boston of­fered none that could help out­side. Ev­ery one now smiles at the bad taste of Queen Vic­to­ria and Louis Philippe — the so­ci­ety of the for­ties — but the taste was on­ly a re­flec­tion of the so­cial slack-​wa­ter be­tween a tide passed, and a tide to come. Boston be­longed to nei­ther, and hard­ly even to Amer­ica. Nei­ther aris­to­crat­ic nor in­dus­tri­al nor so­cial, Boston girls and boys were not near­ly as un­formed as En­glish boys and girls, but had less means of ac­quir­ing form as they grew old­er. Wom­en count­ed for lit­tle as mod­els. Ev­ery boy, from the age of sev­en, fell in love at fre­quent in­ter­vals with some girl — al­ways more or less the same lit­tle girl — who had noth­ing to teach him, or he to teach her, ex­cept rather fa­mil­iar and provin­cial man­ners, un­til they mar­ried and bore chil­dren to re­peat the habit. The idea of at­tach­ing one’s self to a mar­ried wom­an, or of pol­ish­ing one’s man­ners to suit the stan­dards of wom­en of thir­ty, could hard­ly have en­tered the mind of a young Bosto­ni­an, and would have scan­dal­ized his par­ents. From wom­en the boy got the do­mes­tic virtues and noth­ing else. He might not even catch the idea that wom­en had more to give. The gar­den of Eden was hard­ly more prim­itive.

To bal­ance this virtue, the Pu­ri­tan city had al­ways hid­den a dark­er side. Black­guard Boston was on­ly too ed­uca­tion­al, and to most boys much the more in­ter­est­ing. A suc­cess­ful black­guard must en­joy great phys­ical ad­van­tages be­sides a true vo­ca­tion, and Hen­ry Adams had nei­ther; but no boy es­caped some con­tact with vice of a very low form. Black­guardism came con­stant­ly un­der boys’ eyes, and had the charm of force and free­dom and su­pe­ri­or­ity to cul­ture or de­cen­cy. One might fear it, but no one hon­est­ly de­spised it. Now and then it as­sert­ed it­self as ed­uca­tion more rough­ly than school ev­er did. One of the com­mon­est boy-​games of win­ter, in­her­it­ed di­rect­ly from the eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry, was a game of war on Boston Com­mon. In old days the two hos­tile forces were called North-​En­ders and South-​En­ders. In 1850 the North-​En­ders still sur­vived as a leg­end, but in prac­tice it was a bat­tle of the Latin School against all com­ers, and the Latin School, for snow­ball, in­clud­ed all the boys of the West End. When­ev­er, on a half-​hol­iday, the weath­er was soft enough to soft­en the snow, the Com­mon was apt to be the scene of a fight, which be­gan in day­light with the Latin School in force, rush­ing their op­po­nents down to Tremont Street, and which gen­er­al­ly end­ed at dark by the Latin School dwin­dling in num­bers and dis­ap­pear­ing. As the Latin School grew weak, the roughs and young black­guards grew strong. As long as snow­balls were the on­ly weapon, no one was much hurt, but a stone may be put in a snow­ball, and in the dark a stick or a slung­shot in the hands of a boy is as ef­fec­tive as a knife. One af­ter­noon the fight had been long and ex­haust­ing. The boy Hen­ry, fol­low­ing, as his habit was, his big­ger broth­er Charles, had tak­en part in the bat­tle, and had felt his courage much de­pressed by see­ing one of his trusti­est lead­ers, Hen­ry Hig­gin­son — “Bul­ly Hig,” his school name — struck by a stone over the eye, and led off the field bleed­ing in rather a ghast­ly man­ner. As night came on, the Latin School was steadi­ly forced back to the Bea­con Street Mall where they could re­treat no fur­ther with­out dis­band­ing, and by that time on­ly a small band was left, head­ed by two heroes, Sav­age and Mar­vin. A dark mass of fig­ures could be seen be­low, mak­ing ready for the last rush, and ru­mor said that a swarm of black­guards from the slums, led by a gris­ly ter­ror called Conky Daniels, with a club and a hideous rep­uta­tion, was go­ing to put an end to the Bea­con Street cow­ards for­ev­er. Hen­ry want­ed to run away with the oth­ers, but his broth­er was too big to run away, so they stood still and wait­ed im­mo­la­tion. The dark mass set up a shout, and rushed for­ward. The Bea­con Street boys turned and fled up the steps, ex­cept Sav­age and Mar­vin and the few cham­pi­ons who would not run. The ter­ri­ble Conky Daniels swag­gered up, stopped a mo­ment with his body-​guard to swear a few oaths at Mar­vin, and then swept on and chased the fly­ers, leav­ing the few boys un­touched who stood their ground. The ob­vi­ous moral taught that black­guards were not so black as they were paint­ed; but the boy Hen­ry had passed through as much ter­ror as though he were Turenne or Hen­ri IV, and ten or twelve years af­ter­wards when these same boys were fight­ing and falling on all the bat­tle-​fields of Vir­ginia and Mary­land, he won­dered whether their ed­uca­tion on Boston Com­mon had taught Sav­age and Mar­vin how to die.

If vi­olence were a part of com­plete ed­uca­tion, Boston was not in­com­plete. The idea of vi­olence was fa­mil­iar to the an­ti-​slav­ery lead­ers as well as to their fol­low­ers. Most of them suf­fered from it. Mobs were al­ways pos­si­ble. Hen­ry nev­er hap­pened to be ac­tu­al­ly con­cerned in a mob, but he, like ev­ery oth­er boy, was sure to be on hand wher­ev­er a mob was ex­pect­ed, and when­ev­er he heard Gar­ri­son or Wen­dell Phillips speak, he looked for trou­ble. Wen­dell Phillips on a plat­form was a mod­el dan­ger­ous for youth. Theodore Park­er in his pul­pit was not much safer. Worst of all, the ex­ecu­tion of the Fugi­tive Slave Law in Boston — the sight of Court Square packed with bay­onets, and his own friends obliged to line the streets un­der arms as State mili­tia, in or­der to re­turn a ne­gro to slav­ery — wrought fren­zy in the brain of a fif­teen-​year-​old, eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry boy from Quin­cy, who want­ed to miss no rea­son­able chance of mis­chief.

One lived in the at­mo­sphere of the Stamp Act, the Tea Tax, and the Boston Mas­sacre. With­in Boston, a boy was first an eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry politi­cian, and af­ter­wards on­ly a pos­si­bil­ity; be­yond Boston the first step led on­ly fur­ther in­to pol­itics. Af­ter Febru­ary, 1848, but one slight tie re­mained of all those that, since 1776, had con­nect­ed Quin­cy with the out­er world. The Madam stayed in Wash­ing­ton, af­ter her hus­band’s death, and in her turn was struck by paral­ysis and bedrid­den. From time to time her son Charles, whose af­fec­tion and sym­pa­thy for his moth­er in her many tribu­la­tions were al­ways pro­nounced, went on to see her, and in May, 1850, he took with him his twelve-​year-​old son. The jour­ney was meant as ed­uca­tion, and as ed­uca­tion it served the pur­pose of fix­ing in mem­ory the stage of a boy’s thought in 1850. He could not re­mem­ber tak­ing spe­cial in­ter­est in the rail­road jour­ney or in New York; with rail­ways and cities he was fa­mil­iar enough. His first im­pres­sion was the nov­el­ty of cross­ing New York Bay and find­ing an En­glish rail­way car­riage on the Cam­den and Am­boy Rail­road. This was a new world; a sug­ges­tion of cor­rup­tion in the sim­ple habits of Amer­ican life; a step to ex­clu­sive­ness nev­er ap­proached in Boston; but it was amus­ing. The boy rather liked it. At Tren­ton the train set him on board a steam­er which took him to Philadel­phia where he smelt oth­er va­ri­eties of town life; then again by boat to Chester, and by train to Havre de Grace; by boat to Bal­ti­more and thence by rail to Wash­ing­ton. This was the jour­ney he re­mem­bered. The ac­tu­al jour­ney may have been quite dif­fer­ent, but the ac­tu­al jour­ney has no in­ter­est for ed­uca­tion. The mem­ory was all that mat­tered; and what struck him most, to re­main fresh in his mind all his life­time, was the sud­den change that came over the world on en­ter­ing a slave State. He took ed­uca­tion po­lit­ical­ly. The mere ragged­ness of out­line could not have seemed whol­ly new, for even Boston had its ragged edges, and the town of Quin­cy was far from be­ing a vi­sion of neat­ness or good-​re­pair; in truth, he had nev­er seen a fin­ished land­scape; but Mary­land was ragged­ness of a new kind. The rail­way, about the size and char­ac­ter of a mod­ern tram, ram­bled through un­fenced fields and woods, or through vil­lage streets, among a hap­haz­ard va­ri­ety of pigs, cows, and ne­gro ba­bies, who might all have used the cab­ins for pens and styes, had the South­ern pig re­quired styes, but who nev­er showed a sign of care. This was the boy’s im­pres­sion of what slav­ery caused, and, for him, was all it taught. Com­ing down in the ear­ly morn­ing from his bed­room in his grand­moth­er’s house — still called the Adams Build­ing in — F Street and ven­tur­ing out­side in­to the air reek­ing with the thick odor of the catal­pa trees, he found him­self on an earth-​road, or vil­lage street, with wheel-​tracks me­an­der­ing from the colon­nade of the Trea­sury hard by, to the white mar­ble columns and fronts of the Post Of­fice and Patent Of­fice which faced each oth­er in the dis­tance, like white Greek tem­ples in the aban­doned grav­el-​pits of a de­sert­ed Syr­ian city. Here and there low wood­en hous­es were scat­tered along the streets, as in oth­er South­ern vil­lages, but he was chiefly at­tract­ed by an un­fin­ished square mar­ble shaft, half-​a-​mile be­low, and he walked down to in­spect it be­fore break­fast. His aunt dri­ly re­marked that, at this rate, he would soon get through all the sights; but she could not guess — hav­ing lived al­ways in Wash­ing­ton — how lit­tle the sights of Wash­ing­ton had to do with its in­ter­est.

The boy could not have told her; he was nowhere near an un­der­stand­ing of him­self. The more he was ed­ucat­ed, the less he un­der­stood. Slav­ery struck him in the face; it was a night­mare; a hor­ror; a crime; the sum of all wicked­ness! Con­tact made it on­ly more re­pul­sive. He want­ed to es­cape, like the ne­groes, to free soil. Slave States were dirty, un­kempt, pover­ty-​strick­en, ig­no­rant, vi­cious! He had not a thought but re­pul­sion for it; and yet the pic­ture had an­oth­er side. The May sun­shine and shad­ow had some­thing to do with it; the thick­ness of fo­liage and the heavy smells had more; the sense of at­mo­sphere, al­most new, had per­haps as much again; and the brood­ing in­do­lence of a warm cli­mate and a ne­gro pop­ula­tion hung in the at­mo­sphere heav­ier than the catal­pas. The im­pres­sion was not sim­ple, but the boy liked it: dis­tinct­ly it re­mained on his mind as an at­trac­tion, al­most ob­scur­ing Quin­cy it­self. The want of bar­ri­ers, of pave­ments, of forms; the loose­ness, the lazi­ness; the in­do­lent South­ern drawl; the pigs in the streets; the ne­gro ba­bies and their moth­ers with ban­danas; the free­dom, open­ness, swag­ger, of na­ture and man, soothed his John­son blood. Most boys would have felt it in the same way, but with him the feel­ing caught on to an in­her­itance. The soft­ness of his gen­tle old grand­moth­er as she lay in bed and chat­ted with him, did not come from Boston. His aunt was any­thing rather than Bosto­ni­an. He did not whol­ly come from Boston him­self. Though Wash­ing­ton be­longed to a dif­fer­ent world, and the two worlds could not live to­geth­er, he was not sure that he en­joyed the Boston world most. Even at twelve years old he could see his own na­ture no more clear­ly than he would at twelve hun­dred, if by ac­ci­dent he should hap­pen to live so long.

His fa­ther took him to the Capi­tol and on the floor of the Sen­ate, which then, and long af­ter­wards, un­til the era of tourists, was freely open to vis­itors. The old Sen­ate Cham­ber re­sem­bled a pleas­ant po­lit­ical club. Stand­ing be­hind the Vice-​Pres­ident’s chair, which is now the Chief Jus­tice’s, the boy was pre­sent­ed to some of the men whose names were great in their day, and as fa­mil­iar to him as his own. Clay and Web­ster and Cal­houn were there still, but with them a Free Soil can­di­date for the Vice-​Pres­iden­cy had lit­tle to do; what struck boys most was their type. Sen­ators were a species; they all wore an air, as they wore a blue dress coat or brass but­tons; they were Ro­man. The type of Sen­ator in 1850 was rather charm­ing at its best, and the Sen­ate, when in good tem­per, was an agree­able body, num­ber­ing on­ly some six­ty mem­bers, and af­fect­ing the airs of cour­tesy. Its vice was not so much a vice of man­ners or tem­per as of at­ti­tude. The states­man of all pe­ri­ods was apt to be pompous, but even pom­pos­ity was less of­fen­sive than fa­mil­iar­ity — on the plat­form as in the pul­pit — and South­ern pom­pos­ity, when not ar­ro­gant, was ge­nial and sym­pa­thet­ic, al­most quaint and child­like in its sim­ple-​mind­ed­ness; quite a dif­fer­ent thing from the Web­ste­ri­an or Con­klini­an pom­pos­ity of the North. The boy felt at ease there, more at home than he had ev­er felt in Boston State House, though his ac­quain­tance with the cod­fish in the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives went back be­yond dis­tinct rec­ol­lec­tion. Sen­ators spoke kind­ly to him, and seemed to feel so, for they had known his fam­ily so­cial­ly; and, in spite of slav­ery, even J. Q. Adams in his lat­er years, af­ter he ceased to stand in the way of ri­vals, had few per­son­al en­emies. De­cid­ed­ly the Sen­ate, pro-​slav­ery though it were, seemed a friend­ly world.

This first step in na­tion­al pol­itics was a lit­tle like the walk be­fore break­fast; an easy, care­less, ge­nial, en­larg­ing stride in­to a fresh and amus­ing world, where noth­ing was fin­ished, but where even the weeds grew rank. The sec­ond step was like the first, ex­cept that it led to the White House. He was tak­en to see Pres­ident Tay­lor. Out­side, in a pad­dock in front, “Old Whitey,” the Pres­ident’s charg­er, was graz­ing, as they en­tered; and in­side, the Pres­ident was re­ceiv­ing callers as sim­ply as if he were in the pad­dock too. The Pres­ident was friend­ly, and the boy felt no sense of strangeness that he could ev­er re­call. In fact, what strangeness should he feel? The fam­ilies were in­ti­mate; so in­ti­mate that their friend­li­ness out­lived gen­er­ations, civ­il war, and all sorts of rup­ture. Pres­ident Tay­lor owed his elec­tion to Mar­tin Van Bu­ren and the Free Soil Par­ty. To him, the Adamses might still be of use. As for the White House, all the boy’s fam­ily had lived there, and, bar­ring the eight years of An­drew Jack­son’s reign, had been more or less at home there ev­er since it was built. The boy half thought he owned it, and took for grant­ed that he should some day live in it. He felt no sen­sa­tion what­ev­er be­fore Pres­idents. A Pres­ident was a mat­ter of course in ev­ery re­spectable fam­ily; he had two in his own; three, if he count­ed old Nathaniel Gorham, who, was the old­est and first in dis­tinc­tion. Rev­olu­tion­ary pa­tri­ots, or per­haps a Colo­nial Gov­er­nor, might be worth talk­ing about, but any one could be Pres­ident, and some very shady char­ac­ters were like­ly to be. Pres­idents, Sen­ators, Con­gress­men, and such things were swarm­ing in ev­ery street.

Ev­ery one thought alike whether they had an­ces­tors or not. No sort of glo­ry hedged Pres­idents as such, and, in the whole coun­try, one could hard­ly have met with an ad­mis­sion of re­spect for any of­fice or name, un­less it were George Wash­ing­ton. That was — to all ap­pear­ance sin­cere­ly — re­spect­ed. Peo­ple made pil­grim­ages to Mount Ver­non and made even an ef­fort to build Wash­ing­ton a mon­ument. The ef­fort had failed, but one still went to Mount Ver­non, al­though it was no easy trip. Mr. Adams took the boy there in a car­riage and pair, over a road that gave him a com­plete Vir­ginia ed­uca­tion for use ten years af­ter­wards. To the New Eng­land mind, roads, schools, clothes, and a clean face were con­nect­ed as part of the law of or­der or di­vine sys­tem. Bad roads meant bad morals. The moral of this Vir­ginia road was clear, and the boy ful­ly learned it. Slav­ery was wicked, and slav­ery was the cause of this road’s bad­ness which amount­ed to so­cial crime — and yet, at the end of the road and prod­uct of the crime stood Mount Ver­non and George Wash­ing­ton.

Luck­ily boys ac­cept con­tra­dic­tions as read­ily as their el­ders do, or this boy might have be­come pre­ma­ture­ly wise. He had on­ly to re­peat what he was told — that George Wash­ing­ton stood alone. Oth­er­wise this third step in his Wash­ing­ton ed­uca­tion would have been his last. On that line, the prob­lem of progress was not sol­uble, what­ev­er the op­ti­mists and or­ators might say — or, for that mat­ter, what­ev­er they might think. George Wash­ing­ton could not be reached on Boston lines. George Wash­ing­ton was a pri­ma­ry, or, if Vir­gini­ans liked it bet­ter, an ul­ti­mate re­la­tion, like the Pole Star, and amid the end­less rest­less mo­tion of ev­ery oth­er vis­ible point in space, he alone re­mained steady, in the mind of Hen­ry Adams, to the end. All the oth­er points shift­ed their bear­ings; John Adams, Jef­fer­son, Madi­son, Franklin, even John Mar­shall, took var­ied lights, and as­sumed new re­la­tions, but Mount Ver­non al­ways re­mained where it was, with no prac­ti­ca­ble road to reach it; and yet, when he got there, Mount Ver­non was on­ly Quin­cy in a South­ern set­ting. No doubt it was much more charm­ing, but it was the same eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry, the same old fur­ni­ture, the same old pa­tri­ot, and the same old Pres­ident.

The boy took to it in­stinc­tive­ly. The broad Po­tomac and the coons in the trees, the ban­danas and the box-​hedges, the bed­rooms up­stairs and the porch out­side, even Martha Wash­ing­ton her­self in mem­ory, were as nat­ural as the tides and the May sun­shine; he had on­ly en­larged his hori­zon a lit­tle; but he nev­er thought to ask him­self or his fa­ther how to deal with the moral prob­lem that de­duced George Wash­ing­ton from the sum of all wicked­ness. In prac­tice, such tri­fles as con­tra­dic­tions in prin­ci­ple are eas­ily set aside; the fac­ul­ty of ig­nor­ing them makes the prac­ti­cal man; but any at­tempt to deal with them se­ri­ous­ly as ed­uca­tion is fa­tal. Luck­ily Charles Fran­cis Adams nev­er preached and was sin­gu­lar­ly free from cant. He may have had views of his own, but he let his son Hen­ry sat­is­fy him­self with the sim­ple el­emen­tary fact that George Wash­ing­ton stood alone.

Life was not yet com­pli­cat­ed. Ev­ery prob­lem had a so­lu­tion, even the ne­gro. The boy went back to Boston more po­lit­ical than ev­er, and his pol­itics were no longer so mod­ern as the eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry, but took a strong tone of the sev­en­teenth. Slav­ery drove the whole Pu­ri­tan com­mu­ni­ty back on its Pu­ri­tanism. The boy thought as dog­mat­ical­ly as though he were one of his own an­ces­tors. The Slave pow­er took the place of Stu­art kings and Ro­man popes. Ed­uca­tion could go no fur­ther in that course, and ran off in­to emo­tion; but, as the boy grad­ual­ly found his sur­round­ings change, and felt him­self no longer an iso­lat­ed atom in a hos­tile uni­verse, but a sort of her­ring-​fry in a shoal of mov­ing fish, he be­gan to learn the first and eas­ier lessons of prac­ti­cal pol­itics. Thus far he had seen noth­ing but eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry states­man­ship. Amer­ica and he be­gan, at the same time, to be­come aware of a new force un­der the in­no­cent sur­face of par­ty ma­chin­ery. Even at that ear­ly mo­ment, a rather slow boy felt dim­ly con­scious that he might meet some per­son­al dif­fi­cul­ties in try­ing to rec­on­cile six­teenth-​cen­tu­ry prin­ci­ples and eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry states­man­ship with late nine­teenth-​cen­tu­ry par­ty or­ga­ni­za­tion. The first vague sense of feel­ing an un­known liv­ing ob­sta­cle in the dark came in 185l.

The Free Soil con­clave in Mount Ver­non Street be­longed, as al­ready said, to the states­man class, and, like Daniel Web­ster, had noth­ing to do with ma­chin­ery. Web­sters or Se­wards de­pend­ed on oth­ers for ma­chine work and mon­ey — on Pe­ter Har­veys and Thur­low Weeds, who spent their lives in it, took most of the abuse, and asked no re­ward. Al­most with­out know­ing it, the sub­or­di­nates oust­ed their em­ploy­ers and cre­at­ed a ma­chine which no one but them­selves could run. In 1850 things had not quite reached that point. The men who ran the small Free Soil ma­chine were still mod­est, though they be­came fa­mous enough in their own right. Hen­ry Wil­son, John B. Al­ley, An­son Burlingame, and the oth­er man­agers, ne­go­ti­at­ed a bar­gain with the Mas­sachusetts Democrats giv­ing the State to the Democrats and a seat in the Sen­ate to the Free Soil­ers. With this bar­gain Mr. Adams and his states­man friends would have noth­ing to do, for such a coali­tion was in their eyes much like jock­eys sell­ing a race. They did not care to take of­fice as pay for votes sold to pro-​slav­ery Democrats. Theirs was a cor­rect, not to say no­ble, po­si­tion; but, as a mat­ter of fact, they took the ben­efit of the sale, for the coali­tion chose Charles Sum­ner as its can­di­date for the Sen­ate, while George S. Boutwell was made Gov­er­nor for the Democrats. This was the boy’s first les­son in prac­ti­cal pol­itics, and a sharp one; not that he trou­bled him­self with moral doubts, but that he learned the na­ture of a fla­grant­ly cor­rupt po­lit­ical bar­gain in which he was too good to take part, but not too good to take prof­it. Charles Sum­ner hap­pened to be the part­ner to re­ceive these stolen goods, but be­tween his friend and his fa­ther the boy felt no dis­tinc­tion, and, for him, there was none. He en­tered in­to no ca­su­istry on the mat­ter. His friend was right be­cause his friend, and the boy shared the glo­ry. The ques­tion of ed­uca­tion did not rise while the con­flict last­ed. Yet ev­ery one saw as clear­ly then as af­ter­wards that a les­son of some sort must be learned and un­der­stood, once for all. The boy might ig­nore, as a mere his­tor­ical puz­zle, the ques­tion how to de­duce George Wash­ing­ton from the sum of all wicked­ness, but he had him­self helped to de­duce Charles Sum­ner from the sum of po­lit­ical cor­rup­tion. On that line, too, ed­uca­tion could go no fur­ther. Tam­many Hall stood at the end of the vista.

Mr. Al­ley, one of the strictest of moral­ists, held that his ob­ject in mak­ing the bar­gain was to con­vert the Demo­crat­ic Par­ty to an­ti-​slav­ery prin­ci­ples, and that he did it. Hen­ry Adams could rise to no such moral el­eva­tion. He was on­ly a boy, and his ob­ject in sup­port­ing the coali­tion was that of mak­ing his friend a Sen­ator. It was as per­son­al as though he had helped to make his friend a mil­lion­aire. He could nev­er find a way of es­cap­ing im­moral con­clu­sions, ex­cept by ad­mit­ting that he and his fa­ther and Sum­ner were wrong, and this he was nev­er will­ing to do, for the con­se­quences of this ad­mis­sion were worse than those of the oth­er. Thus, be­fore he was fif­teen years old, he had man­aged to get him­self in­to a state of moral con­fu­sion from which he nev­er es­caped. As a politi­cian, he was al­ready cor­rupt, and he nev­er could see how any prac­ti­cal politi­cian could be less cor­rupt than him­self.

Apol­ogy, as he un­der­stood him­self, was cant or cow­ardice. At the time he nev­er even dreamed that he need­ed to apol­ogize, though the press shout­ed it at him from ev­ery cor­ner, and though the Mount Ver­non Street con­clave agreed with the press; yet he could not plead ig­no­rance, and even in the heat of the con­flict, he nev­er cared to de­fend the coali­tion. Boy as he was, he knew enough to know that some­thing was wrong, but his on­ly in­ter­est was the elec­tion. Day af­ter day, the Gen­er­al Court bal­lot­ed; and the boy haunt­ed the gallery, fol­low­ing the roll-​call, and won­dered what Caleb Cush­ing meant by call­ing Mr. Sum­ner a “one-​eyed abo­li­tion­ist.” Tru­ly the dif­fer­ence in mean­ing with the phrase “one-​ideaed abo­li­tion­ist,” which was Mr. Cush­ing’s ac­tu­al ex­pres­sion, is not very great, but nei­ther the one nor the oth­er seemed to de­scribe Mr. Sum­ner to the boy, who nev­er could have made the er­ror of class­ing Gar­ri­son and Sum­ner to­geth­er, or mis­tak­ing Caleb Cush­ing’s re­la­tion to ei­ther. Tem­per ran high at that mo­ment, while Sum­ner ev­ery day missed his elec­tion by on­ly one or two votes. At last, April 24, 1851, stand­ing among the silent crowd in the gallery, Hen­ry heard the vote an­nounced which gave Sum­ner the need­ed num­ber. Slip­ping un­der the arms of the by­standers, he ran home as hard as he could, and burst in­to the din­ing-​room where Mr. Sum­ner was seat­ed at ta­ble with the fam­ily. He en­joyed the glo­ry of telling Sum­ner that he was elect­ed; it was prob­ably the proud­est mo­ment in the life of ei­ther.

The next day, when the boy went to school, he no­ticed num­bers of boys and men in the streets wear­ing black crepe on their arm. He knew few Free Soil boys in Boston; his ac­quain­tances were what he called pro-​slav­ery; so he thought prop­er to tie a bit of white silk rib­bon round his own arm by way of show­ing that his friend Mr. Sum­ner was not whol­ly alone. This lit­tle piece of brava­do passed un­no­ticed; no one even cuffed his ears; but in lat­er life he was a lit­tle puz­zled to de­cide which sym­bol was the more cor­rect. No one then dreamed of four years’ war, but ev­ery one dreamed of se­ces­sion. The sym­bol for ei­ther might well be mat­ter of doubt.

This tri­umph of the Mount Ver­non Street con­clave capped the po­lit­ical cli­max. The boy, like a mil­lion oth­er Amer­ican boys, was a politi­cian, and what was worse, fit as yet to be noth­ing else. He should have been, like his grand­fa­ther, a pro­tege of George Wash­ing­ton, a states­man des­ig­nat­ed by des­tiny, with noth­ing to do but look di­rect­ly ahead, fol­low or­ders, and march. On the con­trary, he was not even a Bosto­ni­an; he felt him­self shut out of Boston as though he were an ex­ile; he nev­er thought of him­self as a Bosto­ni­an; he nev­er looked about him in Boston, as boys com­mon­ly do wher­ev­er they are, to se­lect the street they like best, the house they want to live in, the pro­fes­sion they mean to prac­tise. Al­ways he felt him­self some­where else; per­haps in Wash­ing­ton with its so­cial ease; per­haps in Eu­rope; and he watched with vague un­rest from the Quin­cy hills the smoke of the Cu­nard steam­ers stretch­ing in a long line to the hori­zon, and dis­ap­pear­ing ev­ery oth­er Sat­ur­day or what­ev­er the day might be, as though the steam­ers were of­fer­ing to take him away, which was pre­cise­ly what they were do­ing.

Had these ideas been un­rea­son­able, in­flu­ences enough were at hand to cor­rect them; but the point of the whole sto­ry, when Hen­ry Adams came to look back on it, seemed to be that the ideas were more than rea­son­able; they were the log­ical, nec­es­sary, math­emat­ical re­sult of con­di­tions old as his­to­ry and fixed as fate — in­vari­able se­quence in man’s ex­pe­ri­ence. The on­ly idea which would have been quite un­rea­son­able scarce­ly en­tered his mind. This was the thought of go­ing west­ward and grow­ing up with the coun­try. That he was not in the least fit­ted for go­ing West made no ob­jec­tion what­ev­er, since he was much bet­ter fit­ted than most of the per­sons that went. The con­vinc­ing rea­son for stay­ing in the East was that he had there ev­ery ad­van­tage over the West. He could not go wrong. The West must in­evitably pay an enor­mous trib­ute to Boston and New York. One’s po­si­tion in the East was the best in the world for ev­ery pur­pose that could of­fer an ob­ject for go­ing west­ward. If ev­er in his­to­ry men had been able to cal­cu­late on a cer­tain­ty for a life­time in ad­vance, the cit­izens of the great East­ern sea­ports could do it in 1850 when their rail­way sys­tems were al­ready laid out. Nei­ther to a politi­cian nor to a busi­ness-​man nor to any of the learned pro­fes­sions did the West promise any cer­tain ad­van­tage, while it of­fered un­cer­tain­ties in plen­ty.

At any oth­er mo­ment in hu­man his­to­ry, this ed­uca­tion, in­clud­ing its po­lit­ical and lit­er­ary bias, would have been not on­ly good, but quite the best. So­ci­ety had al­ways wel­comed and flat­tered men so en­dowed. Hen­ry Adams had ev­ery rea­son to be well pleased with it, and not ill-​pleased with him­self. He had all he want­ed. He saw no rea­son for think­ing that any one else had more. He fin­ished with school, not very bril­liant­ly, but with­out find­ing fault with the sum of his knowl­edge. Prob­ably he knew more than his fa­ther, or his grand­fa­ther, or his great-​grand­fa­ther had known at six­teen years old. On­ly on look­ing back, fifty years lat­er, at his own fig­ure in 1854, and pon­der­ing on the needs of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, he won­dered whether, on the whole the boy of 1854 stood near­er to the thought of 1904, or to that of the year 1. He found him­self un­able to give a sure an­swer. The cal­cu­la­tion was cloud­ed by the un­de­ter­mined val­ues of twen­ti­eth-​cen­tu­ry thought, but the sto­ry will show his rea­sons for think­ing that, in es­sen­tials like re­li­gion, ethics, phi­los­ophy; in his­to­ry, lit­er­ature, art; in the con­cepts of all sci­ence, ex­cept per­haps math­emat­ics, the Amer­ican boy of 1854 stood near­er the year 1 than to the year 1900. The ed­uca­tion he had re­ceived bore lit­tle re­la­tion to the ed­uca­tion he need­ed. Speak­ing as an Amer­ican of 1900, he had as yet no ed­uca­tion at all. He knew not even where or how to be­gin.