The New York Times: Stanza: “The iPhone or iPod Touch can act as an electronic book reader.”
Tip of the Week: Turn Your iPhone Into an e-Book

The Education of Henry Adams by Adams, Henry - CHAPTER XXXV

(download Open eBook Format)

The Education of Henry Adams

CHAPTER XXXV

NUNC AGE (1905)

NEAR­LY forty years had passed since the ex-​pri­vate sec­re­tary land­ed at New York with the ex-​Min­is­ters Adams and Mot­ley, when they saw Amer­ican so­ci­ety as a long car­avan stretch­ing out to­wards the plains. As he came up the bay again, Novem­ber 5, 1904, an old­er man than ei­ther his fa­ther or Mot­ley in 1868, he found the ap­proach more strik­ing than ev­er — won­der­ful — un­like any­thing man had ev­er seen — and like noth­ing he had ev­er much cared to see. The out­line of the city be­came fran­tic in its ef­fort to ex­plain some­thing that de­fied mean­ing. Pow­er seemed to have out­grown its servi­tude and to have as­sert­ed its free­dom. The cylin­der had ex­plod­ed, and thrown great mass­es of stone and steam against the sky. The city had the air and move­ment of hys­te­ria, and the cit­izens were cry­ing, in ev­ery ac­cent of anger and alarm, that the new forces must at any cost be brought un­der con­trol. Pros­per­ity nev­er be­fore imag­ined, pow­er nev­er yet wield­ed by man, speed nev­er reached by any­thing but a me­te­or, had made the world ir­ri­ta­ble, ner­vous, queru­lous, un­rea­son­able and afraid. All New York was de­mand­ing new men, and all the new forces, con­densed in­to cor­po­ra­tions, were de­mand­ing a new type of man — a man with ten times the en­durance, en­er­gy, will and mind of the old type — for whom they were ready to pay mil­lions at sight. As one jolt­ed over the pave­ments or read the last week’s news­pa­pers, the new man seemed close at hand, for the old one had plain­ly reached the end of his strength, and his fail­ure had be­come catas­troph­ic. Ev­ery one saw it, and ev­ery mu­nic­ipal elec­tion shrieked chaos. A trav­eller in the high­ways of his­to­ry looked out of the club win­dow on the tur­moil of Fifth Av­enue, and felt him­self in Rome, un­der Dio­cle­tian, wit­ness­ing the an­ar­chy, con­scious of the com­pul­sion, ea­ger for the so­lu­tion, but un­able to con­ceive whence the next im­pulse was to come or how it was to act. The two-​thou­sand-​years fail­ure of Chris­tian­ity roared up­ward from Broad­way, and no Con­stan­tine the Great was in sight.

Hav­ing noth­ing else to do, the trav­eller went on to Wash­ing­ton to wait the end. There Roo­sevelt was train­ing Con­stan­tines and bat­tling Trusts. With the Bat­tle of Trusts, a stu­dent of me­chan­ics felt en­tire sym­pa­thy, not mere­ly as a mat­ter of pol­itics or so­ci­ety, but al­so as a mea­sure of mo­tion. The Trusts and Cor­po­ra­tions stood for the larg­er part of the new pow­er that had been cre­at­ed since 1840, and were ob­nox­ious be­cause of their vig­or­ous and un­scrupu­lous en­er­gy. They were rev­olu­tion­ary, trou­bling all the old con­ven­tions and val­ues, as the screws of ocean steam­ers must trou­ble a school of her­ring. They tore so­ci­ety to pieces and tram­pled it un­der foot. As one of their ear­li­est vic­tims, a cit­izen of Quin­cy, born in 1838, had learned sub­mis­sion and si­lence, for he knew that, un­der the laws of me­chan­ics, any change, with­in the range of the forces, must make his sit­ua­tion on­ly worse; but he was be­yond mea­sure cu­ri­ous to see whether the con­flict of forces would pro­duce the new man, since no oth­er en­er­gies seemed left on earth to breed. The new man could be on­ly a child born of con­tact be­tween the new and the old en­er­gies.

Both had been fa­mil­iar since child­hood, as the sto­ry has shown, and nei­ther had warped the um­pire’s judg­ment by its fa­vors. If ev­er judge had rea­son to be im­par­tial, it was he. The sole ob­ject of his in­ter­est and sym­pa­thy was the new man, and the longer one watched, the less could be seen of him. Of the forces be­hind the Trusts, one could see some­thing; they owned a com­plete or­ga­ni­za­tion, with schools, train­ing, wealth and pur­pose; but of the forces be­hind Roo­sevelt one knew lit­tle; their co­he­sion was slight; their train­ing ir­reg­ular; their ob­jects vague. The pub­lic had no idea what prac­ti­cal sys­tem it could aim at, or what sort of men could man­age it. The sin­gle prob­lem be­fore it was not so much to con­trol the Trusts as to cre­ate the so­ci­ety that could man­age the Trusts. The new Amer­ican must be ei­ther the child of the new forces or a chance sport of na­ture. The at­trac­tion of me­chan­ical pow­er had al­ready wrenched the Amer­ican mind in­to a crab-​like pro­cess which Roo­sevelt was mak­ing hero­ic ef­forts to re­store to even ac­tion, and he had ev­ery right to ac­tive sup­port and sym­pa­thy from all the world, es­pe­cial­ly from the Trusts them­selves so far as they were hu­man; but the doubt per­sist­ed whether the force that ed­ucat­ed was re­al­ly man or na­ture — mind or mo­tion. The me­chan­ical the­ory, most­ly ac­cept­ed by sci­ence, seemed to re­quire that the law of mass should rule. In that case, progress would con­tin­ue as be­fore.

In that, or any oth­er case, a nine­teenth-​cen­tu­ry ed­uca­tion was as use­less or mis­lead­ing as an eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry ed­uca­tion had been to the child of 1838; but Adams had a bet­ter rea­son for hold­ing his tongue. For his dy­nam­ic the­ory of his­to­ry he cared no more than for the ki­net­ic the­ory of gas; but, if it were an ap­proach to mea­sure­ment of mo­tion, it would ver­ify or dis­prove it­self with­in thir­ty years. At the cal­cu­lat­ed ac­cel­er­ation, the head of the me­te­or-​stream must very soon pass per­ihe­lion. There­fore, dis­pute was idle, dis­cus­sion was fu­tile, and si­lence, next to good-​tem­per, was the mark of sense. If the ac­cel­er­ation, mea­sured by the de­vel­op­ment and econ­omy of forces, were to con­tin­ue at its rate since 1800, the math­emati­cian of 1950 should be able to plot the past and fu­ture or­bit of the hu­man race as ac­cu­rate­ly as that of the Novem­ber me­te­oroids.

Nat­ural­ly such an at­ti­tude an­noyed the play­ers in the game, as the at­ti­tude of the um­pire is apt to in­fu­ri­ate the spec­ta­tors. Above all, it was pro­found­ly un­moral, and tend­ed to dis­cour­age ef­fort. On the oth­er hand, it tend­ed to en­cour­age fore­sight and to econ­omize waste of mind. If it was not it­self ed­uca­tion, it point­ed out the economies nec­es­sary for the ed­uca­tion of the new Amer­ican. There, the du­ty stopped.

There, too, life stopped. Na­ture has ed­ucat­ed her­self to a sin­gu­lar sym­pa­thy for death. On the antarc­tic glacier, near­ly five thou­sand feet above sea-​lev­el, Cap­tain Scott found car­cass­es of seals, where the an­imals had la­bo­ri­ous­ly flopped up, to die in peace. “Un­less we had ac­tu­al­ly found these re­mains, it would have been past be­liev­ing that a dy­ing seal could have trans­port­ed it­self over fifty miles of rough, steep, glacier-​sur­face,” but “the seal seems of­ten to crawl to the shore or the ice to die, prob­ably from its in­stinc­tive dread of its ma­rine en­emies.” In In­dia, Pu­run Dass, at the end of states­man­ship, sought soli­tude, and died in sanc­ti­ty among the deer and mon­keys, rather than re­main with man. Even in Amer­ica, the In­di­an Sum­mer of life should be a lit­tle sun­ny and a lit­tle sad, like the sea­son, and in­fi­nite in wealth and depth of tone — but nev­er hus­tled. For that rea­son, one’s own pas­sive ob­scu­ri­ty seemed some­times near­er na­ture than John Hay’s ex­po­sure. To the nor­mal an­imal the in­stinct of sport is in­nate, and his­to­ri­ans them­selves were not ex­empt from the pas­sion of bait­ing their bears; but in its turn even the seal dis­likes to be wor­ried to death in age by crea­tures that have not the strength or the teeth to kill him out­right.

On reach­ing Wash­ing­ton, Novem­ber 14, 1904, Adams saw at a glance that Hay must have rest. Al­ready Mrs. Hay had bade him pre­pare to help in tak­ing her hus­band to Eu­rope as soon as the Ses­sion should be over, and al­though Hay protest­ed that the idea could not even be dis­cussed, his strength failed so rapid­ly that he could not ef­fec­tu­al­ly dis­cuss it, and end­ed by yield­ing with­out strug­gle. He would equal­ly have re­signed of­fice and re­tired, like Pu­run Dass, had not the Pres­ident and the press protest­ed; but he of­ten de­bat­ed the sub­ject, and his friends could throw no light on it. Adams him­self, who had set his heart on see­ing Hay close his ca­reer by mak­ing peace in the East, could on­ly urge that van­ity for van­ity, the crown of peace­mak­er was worth the cross of mar­tyr­dom; but the cross was full in sight, while the crown was still un­cer­tain. Adams found his for­mu­la for Rus­sian in­er­tia ex­as­per­at­ing­ly cor­rect. He thought that Rus­sia should have ne­go­ti­at­ed in­stant­ly on the fall of Port Arthur, Jan­uary 1, 1905; he found that she had not the en­er­gy, but meant to wait till her navy should be de­stroyed. The de­lay mea­sured pre­cise­ly the time that Hay had to spare.

The close of the Ses­sion on March 4 left him bare­ly the strength to crawl on board ship, March 18, and be­fore his steam­er had reached half her course, he had re­vived, al­most as gay as when he first light­ed on the Markoe house in I Street forty-​four years ear­li­er. The clouds that gath­er round the set­ting sun do not al­ways take a sober col­or­ing from eyes that have kept watch on mor­tal­ity; or, at least, the so­bri­ety is some­times scarce­ly sad. One walks with one’s friends square­ly up to the por­tal of life, and bids good-​bye with a smile. One has done it so of­ten! Hay could scarce­ly pace the deck; he nour­ished no il­lu­sions; he was con­vinced that he should nev­er re­turn to his work, and he talked light­ly of the death sen­tence that he might any day ex­pect, but he threw off the col­or­ing of of­fice and mor­tal­ity to­geth­er, and the malar­ia of pow­er left its on­ly trace in the sense of tasks in­com­plete.

One could hon­est­ly help him there. Laugh­ing frankly at his dozen treaties hung up in the Sen­ate Com­mit­tee-​room like lambs in a butch­er’s shop, one could still re­mind him of what was solid­ly com­plet­ed. In his eight years of of­fice he had solved near­ly ev­ery old prob­lem of Amer­ican states­man­ship, and had left lit­tle or noth­ing to an­noy his suc­ces­sor. He had brought the great At­lantic pow­ers in­to a work­ing sys­tem, and even Rus­sia seemed about to be dragged in­to a com­bine of in­tel­li­gent equi­lib­ri­um based on an in­tel­li­gent al­lot­ment of ac­tiv­ities. For the first time in fif­teen hun­dred years a true Ro­man pax was in sight, and would, if it suc­ceed­ed, owe its virtues to him. Ex­cept for mak­ing peace in Manchuria, he could do no more; and if the worst should hap­pen, set­ting con­ti­nent against con­ti­nent in arms — the on­ly ap­par­ent al­ter­na­tive to his scheme — he need not re­pine at miss­ing the catas­tro­phe.

This rosy view served to soothe dis­gusts which ev­ery part­ing states­man feels, and com­mon­ly with rea­son. One had no need to get out one’s note­book in or­der to jot down the ex­act fig­ures on ei­ther side. Why add up the el­ements of re­sis­tance and an­ar­chy? The Kaiser sup­plied him with these fig­ures, just as the Cret­ic ap­proached Mo­roc­co. Ev­ery one was do­ing it, and seemed in a pan­ic about it. The chaos wait­ed on­ly for his land­ing.

Ar­rived at Genoa, the par­ty hid it­self for a fort­night at Nervi, and he gained strength rapid­ly as long as he made no ef­fort and heard no call for ac­tion. Then they all went on to Nan­heim with­out re­lapse. There, af­ter a few days, Adams left him for the reg­ular treat­ment, and came up to Paris. The med­ical re­ports promised well, and Hay’s let­ters were as hu­mor­ous and light-​hand­ed as ev­er. To the last he wrote cheer­ful­ly of his progress, and amus­ing­ly with his usu­al light scep­ti­cism, of his var­ious doc­tors; but when the treat­ment end­ed, three weeks lat­er, and he came on to Paris, he showed, at the first glance, that he had lost strength, and the re­turn to af­fairs and in­ter­views wore him rapid­ly out. He was con­scious of it, and in his last talk be­fore start­ing for Lon­don and Liv­er­pool he took the end of his ac­tiv­ity for grant­ed. “You must hold out for the peace ne­go­ti­ations,” was the re­mon­strance. “I’ve not time!” he replied. “You’ll need lit­tle time!” was the re­join­der. Each was cor­rect.

There it end­ed! Shake­speare him­self could use no more than the com­mon­place to ex­press what is in­ca­pable of ex­pres­sion. “The rest is si­lence!” The few fa­mil­iar words, among the sim­plest in the lan­guage, con­vey­ing an idea trite be­yond ri­val­ry, served Shake­speare, and, as yet, no one has said more. A few weeks af­ter­wards, one warm evening in ear­ly Ju­ly, as Adams was strolling down to dine un­der the trees at Ar­menonville, he learned that Hay was dead. He ex­pect­ed it; on Hay’s ac­count, he was even sat­is­fied to have his friend die, as we would all die if we could, in full fame, at home and abroad, uni­ver­sal­ly re­gret­ted, and wield­ing his pow­er to the last. One had seen scores of em­per­ors and heroes fade in­to cheap ob­scu­ri­ty even when alive; and now, at least, one had not that to fear for one’s friend. It was not even the sud­den­ness of the shock, or the sense of void, that threw Adams in­to the depths of Ham­let’s Shake­speare­an si­lence in the full flare of Paris frivoli­ty in its fa­vorite haunt where world­ly van­ity reached its most fu­tile cli­max in hu­man his­to­ry; it was on­ly the qui­et sum­mons to fol­low — the as­sent to dis­missal. It was time to go. The three friends had be­gun life to­geth­er; and the last of the three had no mo­tive — no at­trac­tion — to car­ry it on af­ter the oth­ers had gone. Ed­uca­tion had end­ed for all three, and on­ly be­yond some re­mot­er hori­zon could its val­ues be fixed or re­newed. Per­haps some day — say 1938, their cen­te­nary — they might be al­lowed to re­turn to­geth­er for a hol­iday, to see the mis­takes of their own lives made clear in the light of the mis­takes of their suc­ces­sors; and per­haps then, for the first time since man be­gan his ed­uca­tion among the car­ni­vores, they would find a world that sen­si­tive and timid na­tures could re­gard with­out a shud­der.