The Education of Henry Adams by Adams, Henry - CHAPTER XXII

(download Open eBook Format)

The Education of Henry Adams

CHAPTER XXII

CHICA­GO (1893)

DRIFT­ING in the dead-​wa­ter of the fin-​de-​siecle — and dur­ing this last decade ev­ery one talked, and seemed to feel fin-​de-​siecle — where not a breath stirred the idle air of ed­uca­tion or fret­ted the men­tal tor­por of self-​con­tent, one lived alone. Adams had long ceased go­ing in­to so­ci­ety. For years he had not dined out of his own house, and in pub­lic his face was as un­known as that of an ex­tinct states­man. He had of­ten no­ticed that six months’ obliv­ion amounts to news­pa­per-​death, and that res­ur­rec­tion is rare. Noth­ing is eas­ier, if a man wants it, than rest, pro­found as the grave.

His friends some­times took pity on him, and came to share a meal or pass a night on their pas­sage south or north­wards, but ex­is­tence was, on the whole, ex­ceed­ing­ly soli­tary, or seemed so to him. Of the so­ci­ety fa­vorites who made the life of ev­ery din­ner- ta­ble and of the halls of Congress — Tom Reed, Bourke Cock­ran, Ed­ward Wol­cott — he knew not one. Al­though Calvin Brice was his next neigh­bor for six years, en­ter­tain­ing lav­ish­ly as no one had ev­er en­ter­tained be­fore in Wash­ing­ton, Adams nev­er en­tered his house. W. C. Whit­ney ri­valled Sen­ator Brice in hos­pi­tal­ity, and was be­sides an old ac­quain­tance of the re­form­ing era, but Adams saw him as lit­tle as he saw his chief, Pres­ident Cleve­land, or Pres­ident Har­ri­son or Sec­re­tary Ba­yard or Blaine or Ol­ney. One has no choice but to go ev­ery­where or nowhere. No one may pick and choose be­tween hous­es, or ac­cept hos­pi­tal­ity with­out re­turn­ing it. He loved soli­tude as lit­tle as oth­ers did; but he was un­fit for so­cial work, and he sank un­der the sur­face.

Luck­ily for such help­less an­imals as soli­tary men, the world is not on­ly good-​na­tured but even friend­ly and gen­er­ous; it loves to par­don if par­don is not de­mand­ed as a right. Adams’s so­cial of­fences were many, and no one was more sen­si­tive to it than him­self; but a few hous­es al­ways re­mained which he could en­ter with­out be­ing asked, and quit with­out be­ing no­ticed. One was John Hay’s; an­oth­er was Cabot Lodge’s; a third led to an in­ti­ma­cy which had the sin­gu­lar ef­fect of ed­ucat­ing him in knowl­edge of the very class of Amer­ican politi­cian who had done most to block his in­tend­ed path in life. Sen­ator Cameron of Penn­syl­va­nia had mar­ried in 1880 a young niece of Sen­ator John Sher­man of Ohio, thus mak­ing an al­liance of dy­nas­tic im­por­tance in pol­itics, and in so­ci­ety a reign of six­teen years, dur­ing which Mrs. Cameron and Mrs. Lodge led a ca­reer, with­out prece­dent and with­out suc­ces­sion, as the dis­pensers of sun­shine over Wash­ing­ton. Both of them had been kind to Adams, and a dozen years of this in­ti­ma­cy had made him one of their ha­bit­ual house­hold, as he was of Hay’s. In a small so­ci­ety, such ties be­tween hous­es be­come po­lit­ical and so­cial force. With­out in­ten­tion or con­scious­ness, they fix one’s sta­tus in the world. What­ev­er one’s pref­er­ences in pol­itics might be, one’s house was bound to the Re­pub­li­can in­ter­est when sand­wiched be­tween Sen­ator Cameron, John Hay, and Cabot Lodge, with Theodore Roo­sevelt equal­ly at home in them all, and Ce­cil Spring-​Rice to unite them by im­par­tial va­ri­ety. The re­la­tion was dai­ly, and the al­liance undis­turbed by pow­er or pa­tron­age, since Mr. Har­ri­son, in those re­spects, showed lit­tle more taste than Mr. Cleve­land for the so­ci­ety and in­ter­ests of this par­tic­ular band of fol­low­ers, whose re­la­tions with the White House were some­times com­ic, but nev­er in­ti­mate.

In Febru­ary, 1893, Sen­ator Cameron took his fam­ily to South Car­oli­na, where he had bought an old plan­ta­tion at Cof­fin’s Point on St. He­le­na Is­land, and Adams, as one of the fam­ily, was tak­en, with the rest, to open the new ex­pe­ri­ence. From there he went on to Ha­vana, and came back to Cof­fin’s Point to linger till near April. In May the Sen­ator took his fam­ily to Chica­go to see the Ex­po­si­tion, and Adams went with them. Ear­ly in June, all sailed for Eng­land to­geth­er, and at last, in the mid­dle of Ju­ly, all found them­selves in Switzer­land, at Pran­gins, Chamounix, and Zer­matt. On Ju­ly 22 they drove across the Fur­ka Pass and went down by rail to Lucerne.

Months of close con­tact teach char­ac­ter, if char­ac­ter has in­ter­est; and to Adams the Cameron type had keen in­ter­est, ev­er since it had ship­wrecked his ca­reer in the per­son of Pres­ident Grant. Per­haps it owed life to Scotch blood; per­haps to the blood of Adam and Eve, the prim­itive strain of man; per­haps on­ly to the blood of the cot­tager work­ing against the blood of the towns­man; but what­ev­er it was, one liked it for its sim­plic­ity. The Penn­syl­va­nia mind, as minds go, was not com­plex; it rea­soned lit­tle and nev­er talked; but in prac­ti­cal mat­ters it was the stead­iest of all Amer­ican types; per­haps the most ef­fi­cient; cer­tain­ly the safest.

Adams had print­ed as much as this in his books, but had nev­er been able to find a type to de­scribe, the two great his­tor­ical Penn­syl­va­ni­ans hav­ing been, as ev­ery one had so of­ten heard, Ben­jamin Franklin of Boston and Al­bert Gal­latin of Gene­va. Of Al­bert Gal­latin, in­deed, he had made a vo­lu­mi­nous study and an elab­orate pic­ture, on­ly to show that he was, if Amer­ican at all, a New York­er, with a Calvin­is­tic strain — rather Con­necti­cut than Penn­syl­va­ni­an. The true Penn­syl­va­ni­an was a nar­row­er type; as nar­row as the kirk; as shy of oth­er peo­ple’s nar­row­ness as a Yan­kee; as self-​lim­it­ed as a Pu­ri­tan farmer. To him, none but Penn­syl­va­ni­ans were white. Chi­na­man, ne­gro, Da­go, Ital­ian, En­glish­man, Yan­kee — all was one in the depths of Penn­syl­va­ni­an con­scious­ness. The men­tal ma­chine could run on­ly on what it took for Amer­ican lines. This was fa­mil­iar, ev­er since one’s study of Pres­ident Grant in 1869; but in 1893, as then, the type was ad­mirably strong and use­ful if one want­ed on­ly to run on the same lines. Prac­ti­cal­ly the Penn­syl­va­ni­an for­got his prej­udices when he al­lied his in­ter­ests. He then be­came sup­ple in ac­tion and large in mo­tive, what­ev­er he thought of his col­leagues. When he hap­pened to be right — which was, of course, when­ev­er one agreed with him — he was the strongest Amer­ican in Amer­ica. As an al­ly he was worth all the rest, be­cause he un­der­stood his own class, who were al­ways a ma­jor­ity; and knew how to deal with them as no New Eng­lan­der could. If one want­ed work done in Congress, one did wise­ly to avoid ask­ing a New Eng­lan­der to do it. A Penn­syl­va­ni­an not on­ly could do it, but did it will­ing­ly, prac­ti­cal­ly, and in­tel­li­gent­ly.

Nev­er in the range of hu­man pos­si­bil­ities had a Cameron be­lieved in an Adams — or an Adams in a Cameron — but they had cu­ri­ous­ly enough, al­most al­ways worked to­geth­er. The Camerons had what the Adamses thought the po­lit­ical vice of reach­ing their ob­jects with­out much re­gard to their meth­ods. The lofti­est virtue of the Penn­syl­va­nia ma­chine had nev­er been its scrupu­lous pu­ri­ty or sparkling pro­fes­sions. The ma­chine worked by coarse means on coarse in­ter­ests, but its prac­ti­cal suc­cess had been the most cu­ri­ous sub­ject of study in Amer­ican his­to­ry. When one summed up the re­sults of Penn­syl­va­ni­an in­flu­ence, one in­clined to think that Penn­syl­va­nia set up the Gov­ern­ment in 1789; saved it in 1861; cre­at­ed the Amer­ican sys­tem; de­vel­oped its iron and coal pow­er; and in­vent­ed its great rail­ways. Fol­low­ing up the same line, in his stud­ies of Amer­ican char­ac­ter, Adams reached the re­sult — to him al­to­geth­er para­dox­ical — that Cameron’s qual­ities and de­fects unit­ed in equal share to make him the most use­ful mem­ber of the Sen­ate.

In the in­ter­est of study­ing, at last, a per­fect and fa­vor­able spec­imen of this Amer­ican type which had so per­sis­tent­ly sup­pressed his own, Adams was slow to no­tice that Cameron strong­ly in­flu­enced him, but he could not see a trace of any in­flu­ence which he ex­er­cised on Cameron. Not an opin­ion or a view of his on any sub­ject was ev­er re­flect­ed back on him from Cameron’s mind; not even an ex­pres­sion or a fact. Yet the dif­fer­ence in age was tri­fling, and in ed­uca­tion slight. On the oth­er hand, Cameron made deep im­pres­sion on Adams, and in noth­ing so much as on the great sub­ject of dis­cus­sion that year — the ques­tion of sil­ver.

Adams had tak­en no in­ter­est in the mat­ter, and knew noth­ing about it, ex­cept as a very te­dious hob­by of his friend Dana Hor­ton; but in­evitably, from the mo­ment he was forced to choose sides, he was sure to choose sil­ver. Ev­ery po­lit­ical idea and per­son­al prej­udice he ev­er dal­lied with held him to the sil­ver stan­dard, and made a bar­ri­er be­tween him and gold. He knew well enough all that was to be said for the gold stan­dard as econ­omy, but he had nev­er in his life tak­en pol­itics for a pur­suit of econ­omy. One might have a po­lit­ical or an eco­nom­ical pol­icy; one could not have both at the same time. This was heresy in the En­glish school, but it had al­ways been law in the Amer­ican. Equal­ly he knew all that was to be said on the moral side of the ques­tion, and he ad­mit­ted that his in­ter­ests were, as Boston main­tained, whol­ly on the side of gold; but, had they been ten times as great as they were, he could not have helped his bankers or croupiers to load the dice and pack the cards to make sure his win­ning the stakes. At least he was bound to pro­fess dis­ap­proval — or thought he was. From ear­ly child­hood his moral prin­ci­ples had strug­gled blind­ly with his in­ter­ests, but he was cer­tain of one law that ruled all oth­ers — mass­es of men in­vari­ably fol­low in­ter­ests in de­cid­ing morals. Moral­ity is a pri­vate and cost­ly lux­ury. The moral­ity of the sil­ver or gold stan­dards was to be de­cid­ed by pop­ular vote, and the pop­ular vote would be de­cid­ed by in­ter­ests; but on which side lay the larg­er in­ter­est? To him the in­ter­est was po­lit­ical; he thought it prob­ably his last chance of stand­ing up for his eigh­teenth-​cen­tu­ry prin­ci­ples, strict con­struc­tion, lim­it­ed pow­ers, George Wash­ing­ton, John Adams, and the rest. He had, in a half-​heart­ed way, strug­gled all his life against State Street, banks, cap­ital­ism al­to­geth­er, as he knew it in old Eng­land or new Eng­land, and he was fat­ed to make his last re­sis­tance be­hind the sil­ver stan­dard.

For him this re­sult was clear, and if he erred, he erred in com­pa­ny with nine men out of ten in Wash­ing­ton, for there was lit­tle dif­fer­ence on the mer­its. Adams was sure to learn back­wards, but the case seemed en­tire­ly dif­fer­ent with Cameron, a typ­ical Penn­syl­va­ni­an, a prac­ti­cal politi­cian, whom all the re­form­ers, in­clud­ing all the Adamses. had abused for a life­time for sub­servience to mon­eyed in­ter­ests and po­lit­ical job­bery. He was sure to go with the banks and cor­po­ra­tions which had made and sus­tained him. On the con­trary, he stood out ob­sti­nate­ly as the lead­ing cham­pi­on of sil­ver in the East. The re­form­ers, rep­re­sent­ed by the Evening Post and God­kin, whose per­son­al in­ter­ests lay with the gold stan­dard, at once as­sumed that Sen­ator Cameron had a per­son­al in­ter­est in sil­ver, and de­nounced his cor­rup­tion as hot­ly as though he had been con­vict­ed of tak­ing a bribe.

More than sil­ver and gold, the moral stan­dard in­ter­est­ed Adams. His own in­ter­ests were with gold, but he sup­port­ed sil­ver; the Evening Post’s and God­kin’s in­ter­ests were with gold, and they frankly said so, yet they avowed­ly pur­sued their in­ter­ests even in­to pol­itics; Cameron’s in­ter­ests had al­ways been with the cor­po­ra­tions, yet he sup­port­ed sil­ver. Thus moral­ity re­quired that Adams should be con­demned for go­ing against his in­ter­ests; that God­kin was vir­tu­ous in fol­low­ing his in­ter­ests; and that Cameron was a scoundrel what­ev­er he did.

Grant­ing that one of the three was a moral id­iot, which was it: — Adams or God­kin or Cameron? Un­til a Coun­cil or a Pope or a Congress or the news­pa­pers or a pop­ular elec­tion has de­cid­ed a ques­tion of doubt­ful moral­ity, in­di­vid­uals are apt to err, es­pe­cial­ly when putting mon­ey in­to their own pock­ets; but in democ­ra­cies, the ma­jor­ity alone gives law. To any one who knew the rel­ative pop­ular­ity of Cameron and God­kin, the idea of a pop­ular vote be­tween them seemed ex­ces­sive­ly hu­mor­ous; yet the pop­ular vote in the end did de­cide against Cameron, for God­kin.

The Boston moral­ist and re­former went on, as al­ways, like Dr. John­son, im­pa­tient­ly stamp­ing his foot and fol­low­ing his in­ter­ests, or his an­tipathies; but the true Amer­ican, slow to grasp new and com­pli­cat­ed ideas, groped in the dark to dis­cov­er where his greater in­ter­est lay. As usu­al, the banks taught him. In the course of fifty years the banks taught one many wise lessons for which an in­sect had to be grate­ful whether it liked them or not; but of all the lessons Adams learned from them, none com­pared in dra­mat­ic ef­fect with that of Ju­ly 22, 1893, when, af­ter talk­ing sil­ver all the morn­ing with Sen­ator Cameron on the top of their trav­el­ling-​car­riage cross­ing the Fur­ka Pass, they reached Lucerne in the af­ter­noon, where Adams found let­ters from his broth­ers re­quest­ing his im­me­di­ate re­turn to Boston be­cause the com­mu­ni­ty was bankrupt and he was prob­ably a beg­gar.

If he want­ed ed­uca­tion, he knew no quick­er mode of learn­ing a les­son than that of be­ing struck on the head by it; and yet he was him­self sur­prised at his own slow­ness to un­der­stand what had struck him. For sev­er­al years a suf­fer­er from in­som­nia, his first thought was of beg­gary of nerves, and he made ready to face a sleep­less night, but al­though his mind tried to wres­tle with the prob­lem how any man could be ru­ined who had, months be­fore, paid off ev­ery dol­lar of debt he knew him­self to owe, he gave up that in­sol­uble rid­dle in or­der to fall back on the larg­er prin­ci­ple that beg­gary could be no more for him than it was for oth­ers who were more valu­able mem­bers of so­ci­ety, and, with that, he went to sleep like a good cit­izen, and the next day start­ed for Quin­cy where he ar­rived Au­gust 7.

As a start­ing-​point for a new ed­uca­tion at fifty-​five years old, the shock of find­ing one’s self sus­pend­ed, for sev­er­al months, over the edge of bankrupt­cy, with­out know­ing how one got there, or how to get away, is to be strong­ly rec­om­mend­ed. By slow de­grees the sit­ua­tion dawned on him that the banks had lent him, among oth­ers, some mon­ey — thou­sands of mil­lions were — as bankrupt­cy — the same — for which he, among oth­ers, was re­spon­si­ble and of which he knew no more than they. The hu­mor of this sit­ua­tion seemed to him so much more point­ed than the ter­ror, as to make him laugh at him­self with a sin­cer­ity he had been long strange to. As far as he could com­pre­hend, he had noth­ing to lose that he cared about, but the banks stood to lose their ex­is­tence. Mon­ey mat­tered as lit­tle to him as to any­body, but mon­ey was their life. For the first time he had the banks in his pow­er; he could af­ford to laugh; and the whole com­mu­ni­ty was in the same po­si­tion, though few laughed. All sat down on the banks and asked what the banks were go­ing to do about it. To Adams the sit­ua­tion seemed far­ci­cal, but the more he saw of it, the less he un­der­stood it. He was quite sure that no­body un­der­stood it much bet­ter. Blind­ly some very pow­er­ful en­er­gy was at work, do­ing some­thing that no­body want­ed done. When Adams went to his bank to draw a hun­dred dol­lars of his own mon­ey on de­posit, the cashier re­fused to let him have more than fifty, and Adams ac­cept­ed the fifty with­out com­plaint be­cause he was him­self re­fus­ing to let the banks have some hun­dreds or thou­sands that be­longed to them. Each want­ed to help the oth­er, yet both re­fused to pay their debts, and he could find no an­swer to the ques­tion which was re­spon­si­ble for get­ting the oth­er in­to the sit­ua­tion, since lenders and bor­row­ers were the same in­ter­est and so­cial­ly the same per­son. Ev­ident­ly the force was one; its op­er­ation was me­chan­ical; its ef­fect must be pro­por­tion­al to its pow­er; but no one knew what it meant, and most peo­ple dis­missed it as an emo­tion — a pan­ic — that meant noth­ing.

Men died like flies un­der the strain, and Boston grew sud­den­ly old, hag­gard, and thin. Adams alone waxed fat and was hap­py, for at last he had got hold of his world and could fin­ish his ed­uca­tion, in­ter­rupt­ed for twen­ty years. He cared not whether it were worth fin­ish­ing, if on­ly it amused; but he seemed, for the first time since 1870, to feel that some­thing new and cu­ri­ous was about to hap­pen to the world. Great changes had tak­en place since 1870 in the forces at work; the old ma­chine ran far be­hind its du­ty; some­where — some­how — it was bound to break down, and if it hap­pened to break pre­cise­ly over one’s head, it gave the bet­ter chance for study.

For the first time in sev­er­al years he saw much of his broth­er Brooks in Quin­cy, and was sur­prised to find him ab­sorbed in the same per­plex­ities. Brooks was then a man of forty-​five years old; a strong writ­er and a vig­or­ous thinker who ir­ri­tat­ed too many Boston con­ven­tions ev­er to suit the at­mo­sphere; but the two broth­ers could talk to each oth­er with­out at­mo­sphere and were used to au­di­ences of one. Brooks had dis­cov­ered or de­vel­oped a law of his­to­ry that civ­iliza­tion fol­lowed the ex­changes, and hav­ing worked it out for the Mediter­ranean was work­ing it out for the At­lantic. Ev­ery­thing Amer­ican, as well as most things Eu­ro­pean and Asi­at­ic, be­came un­sta­ble by this law, seek­ing new equi­lib­ri­um and com­pelled to find it. Lov­ing para­dox, Brooks, with the ad­van­tages of ten years’ study, had swept away much rub­bish in the ef­fort to build up a new line of thought for him­self, but he found that no para­dox com­pared with that of dai­ly events. The facts were con­stant­ly out­run­ning his thoughts. The in­sta­bil­ity was greater than he cal­cu­lat­ed; the speed of ac­cel­er­ation passed bounds. Among oth­er gen­er­al rules he laid down the para­dox that, in the so­cial dis­equi­lib­ri­um be­tween cap­ital and la­bor, the log­ical out­come was not col­lec­tivism, but an­ar­chism; and Hen­ry made note of it for study.

By the time he got back to Wash­ing­ton on Septem­ber 19, the storm hav­ing part­ly blown over, life had tak­en on a new face, and one so in­ter­est­ing that he set off to Chica­go to study the Ex­po­si­tion again, and stayed there a fort­night ab­sorbed in it. He found mat­ter of study to fill a hun­dred years, and his ed­uca­tion spread over chaos. In­deed, it seemed to him as though, this year, ed­uca­tion went mad. The sil­ver ques­tion, thorny as it was, fell in­to re­la­tions as sim­ple as words of one syl­la­ble, com­pared with the prob­lems of cred­it and ex­change that came to com­pli­cate it; and when one sought rest at Chica­go, ed­uca­tion­al game start­ed like rab­bits from ev­ery build­ing, and ran out of sight among thou­sands of its kind be­fore one could mark its bur­row. The Ex­po­si­tion it­self de­fied phi­los­ophy. One might find fault till the last gate closed, one could still ex­plain noth­ing that need­ed ex­pla­na­tion. As a scenic dis­play, Paris had nev­er ap­proached it, but the in­con­ceiv­able scenic dis­play con­sist­ed in its be­ing there at all — more sur­pris­ing, as it was, than any­thing else on the con­ti­nent, Ni­agara Falls, the Yel­low­stone Gey­sers, and the whole rail­way sys­tem thrown in, since these were all nat­ural prod­ucts in their place; while, since Noah’s Ark, no such Ba­bel of loose and ill joined, such vague and ill-​de­fined and un­re­lat­ed thoughts and half-​thoughts and ex­per­imen­tal out­cries as the Ex­po­si­tion, had ev­er ruf­fled the sur­face of the Lakes.

The first as­ton­ish­ment be­came greater ev­ery day. That the Ex­po­si­tion should be a nat­ural growth and prod­uct of the North­west of­fered a step in evo­lu­tion to star­tle Dar­win; but that it should be any­thing else seemed an idea more startling still; and even grant­ing it were not — ad­mit­ting it to be a sort of in­dus­tri­al, spec­ula­tive growth and prod­uct of the Beaux Arts ar­tis­ti­cal­ly in­duced to pass the sum­mer on the shore of Lake Michi­gan — could it be made to seem at home there? Was the Amer­ican made to seem at home in it? Hon­est­ly, he had the air of en­joy­ing it as though it were all his own; he felt it was good; he was proud of it; for the most part, he act­ed as though he had passed his life in land­scape gar­den­ing and ar­chi­tec­tural dec­ora­tion. If he had not done it him­self, he had known how to get it done to suit him, as he knew how to get his wives and daugh­ters dressed at Worth’s or Paquin’s. Per­haps he could not do it again; the next time he would want to do it him­self and would show his own faults; but for the mo­ment he seemed to have leaped di­rect­ly from Corinth and Syra­cuse and Venice, over the heads of Lon­don and New York, to im­pose clas­si­cal stan­dards on plas­tic Chica­go. Crit­ics had no trou­ble in crit­icis­ing the clas­si­cism, but all trad­ing cities had al­ways shown traders’ taste, and, to the stern purist of re­li­gious faith, no art was thin­ner than Vene­tian Goth­ic. All trad­er’s taste smelt of bric-​a-​brac; Chica­go tried at least to give her taste a look of uni­ty.

One sat down to pon­der on the steps be­neath Richard Hunt’s dome al­most as deeply as on the steps of Ara Coeli, and much to the same pur­pose. Here was a breach of con­ti­nu­ity — a rup­ture in his­tor­ical se­quence! Was it re­al, or on­ly ap­par­ent? One’s per­son­al uni­verse hung on the an­swer, for, if the rup­ture was re­al and the new Amer­ican world could take this sharp and con­scious twist to­wards ide­als, one’s per­son­al friends would come in, at last, as win­ners in the great Amer­ican char­iot-​race for fame. If the peo­ple of the North­west ac­tu­al­ly knew what was good when they saw it, they would some day talk about Hunt and Richard­son, La Farge and St. Gau­dens, Burn­ham and McKim, and Stan­ford White when their politi­cians and mil­lion­aires were oth­er­wise for­got­ten. The artists and ar­chi­tects who had done the work of­fered lit­tle en­cour­age­ment to hope it; they talked freely enough, but not in terms that one cared to quote; and to them the North­west re­fused to look artis­tic. They talked as though they worked on­ly for them­selves; as though art, to the West­ern peo­ple, was a stage dec­ora­tion; a di­amond shirt-​stud; a pa­per col­lar; but pos­si­bly the ar­chi­tects of Paes­tum and Gir­gen­ti had talked in the same way, and the Greek had said the same thing of Semitic Carthage two thou­sand years ago.

Jos­tled by these hopes and doubts, one turned to the ex­hibits for help, and found it. The in­dus­tri­al schools tried to teach so much and so quick­ly that the in­struc­tion ran to waste. Some mil­lions of oth­er peo­ple felt the same help­less­ness, but few of them were seek­ing ed­uca­tion, and to them help­less­ness seemed nat­ural and nor­mal, for they had grown up in the habit of think­ing a steam-​en­gine or a dy­namo as nat­ural as the sun, and ex­pect­ed to un­der­stand one as lit­tle as the oth­er. For the his­to­ri­an alone the Ex­po­si­tion made a se­ri­ous ef­fort. His­tor­ical ex­hibits were com­mon, but they nev­er went far enough; none were thor­ough­ly worked out. One of the best was that of the Cu­nard steam­ers, but still a stu­dent hun­gry for re­sults found him­self obliged to waste a pen­cil and sev­er­al sheets of pa­per try­ing to cal­cu­late ex­act­ly when, ac­cord­ing to the giv­en in­crease of pow­er, ton­nage, and speed, the growth of the ocean steam­er would reach its lim­its. His fig­ures brought him, he thought, to the year 1927; an­oth­er gen­er­ation to spare be­fore force, space, and time should meet. The ocean steam­er ran the surest line of tri­an­gu­la­tion in­to the fu­ture, be­cause it was the near­est of man’s prod­ucts to a uni­ty; rail­roads taught less be­cause they seemed al­ready fin­ished ex­cept for mere in­crease in num­ber; ex­plo­sives taught most, but need­ed a tribe of chemists, physi­cists, and math­emati­cians to ex­plain; the dy­namo taught least be­cause it had bare­ly reached in­fan­cy, and, if its progress was to be con­stant at the rate of the last ten years, it would re­sult in in­fi­nite cost­less en­er­gy with­in a gen­er­ation. One lin­gered long among the dy­namos, for they were new, and they gave to his­to­ry a new phase. Men of sci­ence could nev­er un­der­stand the ig­no­rance and naivete; of the his­to­ri­an, who, when he came sud­den­ly on a new pow­er, asked nat­ural­ly what it was; did it pull or did it push? Was it a screw or thrust? Did it flow or vi­brate? Was it a wire or a math­emat­ical line? And a score of such ques­tions to which he ex­pect­ed an­swers and was as­ton­ished to get none.

Ed­uca­tion ran ri­ot at Chica­go, at least for re­tard­ed minds which had nev­er faced in con­crete form so many mat­ters of which they were ig­no­rant. Men who knew noth­ing what­ev­er — who had nev­er run a steam-​en­gine, the sim­plest of forces — who had nev­er put their hands on a lever — had nev­er touched an elec­tric bat­tery — nev­er talked through a tele­phone, and had not the shad­ow of a no­tion what amount of force was meant by a watt or an am­pere or an erg, or any oth­er term of mea­sure­ment in­tro­duced with­in a hun­dred years — had no choice but to sit down on the steps and brood as they had nev­er brood­ed on the bench­es of Har­vard Col­lege, ei­ther as stu­dent or pro­fes­sor, aghast at what they had said and done in all these years, and still more ashamed of the child­like ig­no­rance and bab­bling fu­til­ity of the so­ci­ety that let them say and do it. The his­tor­ical mind can think on­ly in his­tor­ical pro­cess­es, and prob­ably this was the first time since his­to­ri­ans ex­ist­ed, that any of them had sat down help­less be­fore a me­chan­ical se­quence. Be­fore a meta­phys­ical or a the­olog­ical or a po­lit­ical se­quence, most his­to­ri­ans had felt help­less, but the sin­gle clue to which they had hith­er­to trust­ed was the uni­ty of nat­ural force.

Did he him­self quite know what he meant? Cer­tain­ly not! If he had known enough to state his prob­lem, his ed­uca­tion would have been com­plete at once. Chica­go asked in 1893 for the first time the ques­tion whether the Amer­ican peo­ple knew where they were driv­ing. Adams an­swered, for one, that he did not know, but would try to find out. On re­flect­ing suf­fi­cient­ly deeply, un­der the shad­ow of Richard Hunt’s ar­chi­tec­ture, he de­cid­ed that the Amer­ican peo­ple prob­ably knew no more than he did; but that they might still be driv­ing or drift­ing un­con­scious­ly to some point in thought, as their so­lar sys­tem was said to be drift­ing to­wards some point in space; and that, pos­si­bly, if re­la­tions enough could be ob­served, this point might be fixed. Chica­go was the first ex­pres­sion of Amer­ican thought as a uni­ty; one must start there.

Wash­ing­ton was the sec­ond. When he got back there, he fell head­long in­to the ex­tra ses­sion of Congress called to re­peal the Sil­ver Act. The sil­ver mi­nor­ity made an ob­sti­nate at­tempt to pre­vent it, and most of the ma­jor­ity had lit­tle heart in the cre­ation of a sin­gle gold stan­dard. The banks alone, and the deal­ers in ex­change, in­sist­ed up­on it; the po­lit­ical par­ties di­vid­ed ac­cord­ing to cap­ital­is­tic ge­ograph­ical lines, Sen­ator Cameron of­fer­ing al­most the on­ly ex­cep­tion; but they mixed with un­usu­al good-​tem­per, and made lib­er­al al­lowance for each oth­ers’ ac­tions and mo­tives. The strug­gle was rather less ir­ri­ta­ble than such strug­gles gen­er­al­ly were, and it end­ed like a com­edy. On the evening of the fi­nal vote, Sen­ator Cameron came back from the Capi­tol with Sen­ator Brice, Sen­ator Jones, Sen­ator Lodge, and More­ton Frewen, all in the gayest of hu­mors as though they were rid of a heavy re­spon­si­bil­ity. Adams, too, in a by­stander’s spir­it, felt light in mind. He had stood up for his eigh­teenth cen­tu­ry, his Con­sti­tu­tion of 1789, his George Wash­ing­ton, his Har­vard Col­lege, his Quin­cy, and his Ply­mouth Pil­grims, as long as any one would stand up with him. He had said it was hope­less twen­ty years be­fore, but he had kept on, in the same old at­ti­tude, by habit and taste, un­til he found him­self al­to­geth­er alone. He had hugged his an­ti­quat­ed dis­like of bankers and cap­ital­is­tic so­ci­ety un­til he had be­come lit­tle bet­ter than a crank. He had known for years that he must ac­cept the regime, but he had known a great many oth­er dis­agree­able cer­tain­ties — like age, se­nil­ity, and death — against which one made what lit­tle re­sis­tance one could. The mat­ter was set­tled at last by the peo­ple. For a hun­dred years, be­tween 1793 and 1893, the Amer­ican peo­ple had hes­itat­ed, vac­il­lat­ed, swayed for­ward and back, be­tween two forces, one sim­ply in­dus­tri­al, the oth­er cap­ital­is­tic, cen­tral­iz­ing, and me­chan­ical. In 1893, the is­sue came on the sin­gle gold stan­dard, and the ma­jor­ity at last de­clared it­self, once for all, in fa­vor of the cap­ital­is­tic sys­tem with all its nec­es­sary ma­chin­ery. All one’s friends, all one’s best cit­izens, re­form­ers, church­es, col­leges, ed­ucat­ed class­es, had joined the banks to force sub­mis­sion to cap­ital­ism; a sub­mis­sion long fore­seen by the mere law of mass. Of all forms of so­ci­ety or gov­ern­ment, this was the one he liked least, but his likes or dis­likes were as an­ti­quat­ed as the rebel doc­trine of State rights. A cap­ital­is­tic sys­tem had been adopt­ed, and if it were to be run at all, it must be run by cap­ital and by cap­ital­is­tic meth­ods; for noth­ing could sur­pass the non­sen­si­ty of try­ing to run so com­plex and so con­cen­trat­ed a ma­chine by South­ern and West­ern farm­ers in grotesque al­liance with city day-​la­bor­ers, as had been tried in 1800 and 1828, and had failed even un­der sim­ple con­di­tions.

There, ed­uca­tion in do­mes­tic pol­itics stopped. The rest was ques­tion of gear; of run­ning ma­chin­ery; of econ­omy; and in­volved no dis­put­ed prin­ci­ple. Once ad­mit­ted that the ma­chine must be ef­fi­cient, so­ci­ety might dis­pute in what so­cial in­ter­est it should be run, but in any case it must work con­cen­tra­tion. Such great rev­olu­tions com­mon­ly leave some bit­ter­ness be­hind, but noth­ing in pol­itics ev­er sur­prised Hen­ry Adams more than the ease with which he and his sil­ver friends slipped across the chasm, and alight­ed on the sin­gle gold stan­dard and the cap­ital­is­tic sys­tem with its meth­ods; the pro­tec­tive tar­iff; the cor­po­ra­tions and trusts; the trades-​unions and so­cial­is­tic pa­ter­nal­ism which nec­es­sar­ily made their com­ple­ment; the whole me­chan­ical con­sol­ida­tion of force, which ruth­less­ly stamped out the life of the class in­to which Adams was born, but cre­at­ed mo­nop­olies ca­pa­ble of con­trol­ling the new en­er­gies that Amer­ica adored.

So­ci­ety rest­ed, af­ter sweep­ing in­to the ash-​heap these cin­ders of a mis­di­rect­ed ed­uca­tion. Af­ter this vig­or­ous im­pulse, noth­ing re­mained for a his­to­ri­an but to ask — how long and how far!