The New York Times: Stanza: “The iPhone or iPod Touch can act as an electronic book reader.”
Tip of the Week: Turn Your iPhone Into an e-Book

American Merchant Ships and Sailors by Abbot, Willis J. - CHAPTER VIII

(download Open eBook Format)

American Merchant Ships and Sailors

CHAPTER VIII

THE MIS­SIS­SIP­PI AND TRIB­UTARY RIVERS--THE CHANG­ING PHAS­ES OF THEIR SHIP­PING--RIV­ER NAV­IGA­TION AS A NA­TION-​BUILD­ING FORCE--THE VAL­UE OF SMALL STREAMS--WORK OF THE OHIO COM­PA­NY--AN EAR­LY PRO­PELLER--THE FRENCH FIRST ON THE MIS­SIS­SIP­PI--THE SPANIARDS AT NEW OR­LEANS--EAR­LY METH­ODS OF NAV­IGA­TION--THE FLAT­BOAT, THE BROAD­HORN, AND THE KEEL­BOAT--LIFE OF THE RIVER­MEN--PI­RATES AND BUC­CA­NEERS--LAFITTE AND THE BARATAR­IANS--THE GEN­ESIS OF THE STEAM­BOATS--CAPRI­CIOUS RIV­ER--FLUSH TIMES IN NEW OR­LEANS--RAPID MUL­TI­PLI­CA­TION OF STEAM­BOATS--RE­CENT FIG­URES ON RIV­ER SHIP­PING--COM­MODORE WHIP­PLE'S EX­PLOIT--THE MEN WHO STEERED THE STEAM­BOATS--THEIR TECH­NI­CAL ED­UCA­TION--THE SHIPS THEY STEERED--FIRES AND EX­PLO­SIONS--HERO­ISM OF THE PI­LOTS--THE RAC­ERS.

It is the or­di­nary opin­ion, and one ex­pressed too of­ten in pub­li­ca­tions which might be ex­pect­ed to speak with some de­gree of ac­cu­ra­cy, that riv­er trans­porta­tion in the Unit­ed States is a dy­ing in­dus­try. We read ev­ery now and then of the dis­ap­pear­ance of the mag­nif­icent Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er steam­ers, and the mag­azines not in­fre­quent­ly treat their read­ers to glow­ing sto­ries of what is called the “flush” times on the Mis­sis­sip­pi, when the gor­geous­ness of the pas­sen­ger ac­com­mo­da­tions, the lav­ish­ness of the ta­ble, the prodi­gal­ity of the gam­bling, and the min­gled mag­nif­icence and out­lawry of life on the great pack­ets made up a pic­turesque and ro­man­tic phase of Amer­ican life. It is true that much of the pic­turesque­ness and the ro­mance has de­part­ed long since. The great riv­er no longer bears on its tur­bid bo­som many of the tow­er­ing castel­lat­ed boats built to run, as the say­ing was, on a heavy dew, but still car­ry­ing their tiers up­on tiers of ivory-​white cab­ins high in air. The time is past when the riv­er was the great pas­sen­ger thor­ough­fare from St. Louis to New Or­leans. Some few pack­ets still ply up­on its sur­face, but in the main the pas­sen­ger traf­fic has been di­vert­ed to the rail­roads which close­ly par­al­lel its chan­nel on ei­ther side. The Amer­ican trav­els much, but he likes to trav­el fast, and for pas­sen­ger traf­fic, ex­cept on a few routes where spe­cial con­di­tions ob­tain, the steam­boat has long since been out­classed by the rail­roads.

Yet de­spite the dis­ap­pear­ance of its spec­tac­ular con­di­tions the wa­ter traf­fic on the rivers of the Mis­sis­sip­pi Val­ley is greater now than at any time in its his­to­ry. Its meth­ods on­ly have changed. In­stead of gor­geous pack­ets crowd­ed with a gay and prodi­gal throng of trav­el­ers for plea­sure, we now find most of­ten one dingy, puff­ing steam­boat, prob­ably with no pas­sen­ger ac­com­mo­da­tions at all, but which push­es be­fore her from Pitts­burg to New Or­leans more than a score of flat­bot­tomed, square-​nosed scows, ag­gre­gat­ing per­haps more than an acre of sur­face, and heavy laden with coal. Such a tow--for “tow” it is in the riv­er ver­nac­ular, al­though it is pushed--will trans­port more in one trip than would suf­fice to load six heavy freight trains. Not in­fre­quent­ly the barges or scows will num­ber more than thir­ty, car­ry­ing more than 1000 tons each, or a car­go ex­ceed­ing in val­ue $100,000. Dur­ing the sea­son when nav­iga­tion is open on the Ohio and its trib­utaries, this traf­fic is pur­sued with­out in­ter­rup­tion. Through it and through the lo­cal busi­ness on the low­er Mis­sis­sip­pi, and the streams which flow in­to it, there is built up a ton­nage which shows the freight move­ment, at least, on the great rivers, to ex­ceed, even in these days of rail­roads, any­thing record­ed in their his­to­ry.

No phys­ical char­ac­ter­is­tic of the Unit­ed States has con­tribut­ed so great­ly to the na­tion­al­iza­tion of the coun­try and its peo­ple, as the to­pog­ra­phy of its rivers. From the very ear­li­est days they have been the path­ways along which pro­ceed­ed ex­plo­ration and set­tle­ment. Our fore­fa­thers, when they found the nar­row strip of land along the At­lantic coast which they had at first oc­cu­pied, be­com­ing crowd­ed, ac­cord­ing to their ideas at the time, be­gan work­ing west­ward, fol­low­ing the riv­er gaps. Up the Hud­son and west­ward by the Mo­hawk, up the Susque­han­na and the Po­tomac, car­ry­ing around the falls that im­ped­ed the course of those streams, trudg­ing over the moun­tains, and build­ing flat­boats at the head­wa­ters of the Ohio, they made their way west. Some of the most puny streams were uti­lized for wa­ter-​car­ri­ers, and the trav­el­er of to-​day on cer­tain of the rail­roads through west­ern New York and Penn­syl­va­nia, will be amazed to see the rem­nants of canals, painful­ly built in the beds of brawl­ing streams, that now would hard­ly float an In­di­an birch-​bark ca­noe. In their time these canals served use­ful pur­pos­es. The stream was dammed and locked ev­ery few hun­dred yards, and so con­vert­ed in­to a placid wa­ter­way with a flight of me­chan­ical steps, by which the boats were let down to, or raised up from tide­wa­ter. To-​day noth­ing re­mains of most of these works of en­gi­neer­ing, ex­cept mass­es of shat­tered ma­son­ry. For the rail­roads, us­ing the riv­er's bank, and some­times even part of the re­tain­ing walls of the canals for their roadbeds, have shrewd­ly ob­tained and swift­ly em­ployed au­thor­ity to de­stroy all the fit­tings of these wa­ter­ways which might, per­haps, at some time, of­fer to their busi­ness a cer­tain ri­val­ry.

The cor­po­ra­tion known as the Ohio Com­pa­ny, with a great pur­chase of land from Congress in 1787, by keen ad­ver­tis­ing, and the meth­ods of the mod­ern re­al-​es­tate boomer, start­ed the tide of em­igra­tion and the fleet of boats down the Ohio. The first craft sent out by this cor­po­ra­tion was named, ap­pro­pri­ate­ly enough, the “Mayflow­er.” She drift­ed from Pitts­burg to a spot near the mouth of the Musk­ingum riv­er. Soon the im­mi­grants be­gan to fol­low by scores, and then by thou­sands. Mr. Mc­Mas­ter has col­lect­ed some con­tem­po­rary ev­idence of their num­bers. One man at Fort Pitt saw fifty flat­boats set forth be­tween the first of March and the mid­dle of April, 1787. Be­tween Oc­to­ber, 1786, and May, 1787--the frozen sea­son when boats were nec­es­sar­ily in­fre­quent--the ad­ju­tant at Fort Harmer count­ed one hun­dred and sev­en­ty-​sev­en flat-​boats, and es­ti­mat­ed they car­ried twen­ty-​sev­en hun­dred set­tlers. A shab­by and clum­sy fleet it was, in­deed, with on­ly enough sea­man­ship in­volved to push off a sand-​bar, but it was a great fac­tor in the up­build­ing of the na­tion. And a cu­ri­ous fact is that the voy­agers on one of these riv­er craft hit up­on the prin­ci­ple of the screw-​pro­peller, and put it to ef­fec­tive use. The sto­ry is told in the di­ary of Man­asseh Cut­ler, a mem­ber of the Ohio Com­pa­ny, who writes: “As­sist­ed by a num­ber of peo­ple, we went to work and con­struct­ed a ma­chine in the form of a screw, with short blades, and placed it in the stern of the boat, which we turned with a crank. It suc­ceed­ed to per­fec­tion, and I think it a very use­ful dis­cov­ery.” But the dis­cov­ery was for­got­ten for near­ly three-​quar­ters of a cen­tu­ry, un­til John Er­ic­sson re­dis­cov­ered and uti­lized it.

Once across the di­vide, the ear­ly stream of im­mi­gra­tion took its way down the Ohio Riv­er to the Mis­sis­sip­pi. There it met the out­posts of French pow­er, for the French burst open that great riv­er, fol­low­ing their mis­sion­ar­ies, Mar­quette and Joli­et, down from its head­wa­ters in Wis­con­sin, or press­ing up from their ear­ly set­tle­ments at New Or­leans. Doubt­less, if it had not been that the Mis­sis­sip­pi af­ford­ed the most prac­ti­ca­ble, and the most use­ful high­way from north to south, the young Amer­ican peo­ple would have had a French State to the west­ward of them un­til they had gone much fur­ther on the path to­ward na­tion­al man­hood. But the nav­iga­tion of the Mis­sis­sip­pi and its trib­utaries was so rich a prize, that it stim­ulat­ed alike con­sid­er­ations of in­di­vid­ual self-​in­ter­est and na­tion­al am­bi­tion. From the day when the first flat­boat made its way from the falls of the Ohio to New Or­leans, it was the fixed de­ter­mi­na­tion of all peo­ple liv­ing by the great riv­er, or us­ing it as a high­way for com­merce, that from its head­wa­ters to its mouth it should be a pure­ly Amer­ican stream. It was in this way that the Mis­sis­sip­pi and its trib­utaries proved to be, as I have said, a great in­flu­ence in de­vel­op­ing the spir­it of co­her­ent na­tion­al­ity among the peo­ple of the young na­tion.

In­deed, no na­tion­al Gov­ern­ment could be of much val­ue to the farm­ers and trap­pers of Ken­tucky and Ten­nessee that did not as­sure them the right to nav­igate the Mis­sis­sip­pi to its mouth, and find there a place to trans-​ship their goods in­to ocean-​go­ing ves­sels. From the At­lantic seaboard they were shut off by a wall, that for all pur­pose of ex­port trade was im­pen­etra­ble. The swift cur­rent of the rivers beat back their ves­sels, the tow­er­ing ranges of the Al­legha­nies mocked at their ef­forts at road build­ing. From their hills flowed the wa­ter that filled the Fa­ther of Wa­ters and his trib­utaries. Na­ture had clear­ly de­signed this for their out­let. As James Madi­son wrote: “The Mis­sis­sip­pi is to them ev­ery­thing. It is the Hud­son, the Delaware, the Po­tomac, and all the nav­iga­ble wa­ters of the At­lantic coast formed in­to one stream.” Yet, when the first trad­er, in 1786, drift­ed with his flat­boat from Ohio down to New Or­leans, thus en­ter­ing the con­fines of Span­ish ter­ri­to­ry, he was seized and im­pris­oned, his goods were tak­en from him, and at last he was turned loose, pen­ni­less, to plod on foot the long way back to his home, telling the sto­ry of his hard­ships as he went along. The name of that man was Thomas Amis, and af­ter his case be­came known in the great val­ley, it ceased to be a mat­ter of doubt that the Amer­icans would con­trol the Mis­sis­sip­pi. He was in a sense the fore­run­ner of Jef­fer­son and Jack­son, for af­ter his time no in­tel­li­gent states­man could doubt that New Or­leans must be ours, nor any sol­dier ques­tion the need for de­fend­ing it des­per­ate­ly against any for­eign pow­er. The sto­ry of the way in which Gen. James Wilkin­son, by in­trigue and trick­ery, some years lat­er se­cured a par­tial re­lax­ation of Span­ish vig­ilance, can not be told here, though his plot had much to do with open­ing the great riv­er.

[Il­lus­tra­tion: FLAT­BOATS MANNED WITH RI­FLE­MEN]

The sto­ry of nav­iga­tion on the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er, is not with­out its el­ements of ro­mance, though it does not ap­proach in world in­ter­est the sto­ry of the achieve­ments of the New Eng­land mariners on all the oceans of the globe. Lit­tle dan­ger from tem­pest was en­coun­tered here. The nat­ural per­ils to nav­iga­tion were but an ig­no­ble and un­ro­man­tic kind--the shift­ing sand-​bar and the treach­er­ous snag. Yet, in the ear­ly days, when the flat­boats were built at Cincin­nati or Pitts­burg, with high para­pets of logs or heavy tim­ber about their sides, and manned not on­ly with men to work the sweeps and hold the steer­ing oar, but with ri­fle­men, alert of eye, and unerring of aim, to watch for the lurk­ing sav­age on the banks, there was per­il in the voy­age that might even af­fect the stout nerves of the hardy nav­iga­tor from New Bed­ford or Nan­tuck­et. For many long years in the ear­ly days of our coun­try's his­to­ry, the sav­ages of the Mis­sis­sip­pi Val­ley were al­ways hos­tile, con­tin­ual­ly en­raged. The French and the En­glish, bent up­on stir­ring up an­tag­onism to the grow­ing young na­tion, had their agents per­sis­tent­ly at work awak­en­ing In­di­an hos­til­ity, and, in­deed, it is prob­able that had this not been the case, the rough and law­less char­ac­ter of the Amer­ican pi­oneers, and their en­tire in­dif­fer­ence to the rights of the In­di­ans, whom they were bent on dis­plac­ing, would have fur­nished suf­fi­cient cause for con­flict.

First of the craft to fol­low the In­di­an ca­noes and the bateaux of the French mis­sion­ar­ies down the great rivers, was the flat­boat--a home­ly and un­grace­ful ves­sel, but yet one to which the peo­ple of the Unit­ed States owe, per­haps, more of re­al ser­vice in the di­rec­tion of build­ing up a great na­tion than they do to Dewey's “Olympia,” or Sch­ley's “Brook­lyn.” A typ­ical flat­boat of the ear­ly days of riv­er nav­iga­tion was about fifty-​five feet long by six­teen broad. It was with­out a keel, as its name would in­di­cate, and drew about three feet of wa­ter. Amid­ships was built a rough deck-​house or cab­in, from the roof of which ex­tend­ed on ei­ther side, two long oars, used for di­rect­ing the course of the craft rather than for propul­sion, since her way was ev­er down­ward with the cur­rent, and de­pen­dent up­on it. These great oars seemed to the fan­cy of the ear­ly flat­boat men, to re­sem­ble horns, hence the name “broad­horns,” some­times ap­plied to the boats. Such a boat the set­tler would fill with house­hold goods and farm stock, and com­mit him­self to the cur­rent at Pitts­burg. From the roof of the cab­in that housed his fam­ily, cocks crew and hens cack­led, while the stol­id eyes of cat­tle peered over the high para­pet of logs built about the edge for pro­tec­tion against the ar­row or bul­let of the wan­der­ing red­skin. Some­times sev­er­al fam­ilies would com­bine to build one ark. Drift­ing slow­ly down the riv­er--the voy­age from Pitts­burg to the falls of the Ohio, where Louisville now stands, re­quir­ing with the best luck, a week or ten days--the shore on ei­ther hand would be close­ly scanned for signs of un­usu­al fer­til­ity, or for the open­ing of some small stream sug­gest­ing a good place to “set­tle.” When a spot was picked out the boat would be run aground, the boards of the cab­in erect­ed skil­ful­ly in­to a hut, and a new out­post of civ­iliza­tion would be es­tab­lished. As these set­tle­ments mul­ti­plied, and the course of em­igra­tion to the west and south­west in­creased, riv­er life be­came full of va­ri­ety and gai­ety. In some years more than a thou­sand boats were count­ed pass­ing Ma­ri­et­ta. Sev­er­al boats would lash to­geth­er and make the voy­age to New Or­leans, which some­times oc­cu­pied months, in com­pa­ny. There would be frol­ics and dances, the notes of the vi­olin--an al­most uni­ver­sal in­stru­ment among the flat­boat men--sound­ed across the wa­ters by night to the lone­ly cab­ins on the shores, and the set­tlers not in­fre­quent­ly would put off in their skiffs to meet the un­known voy­agers, ask for the news from the east, and share in their rev­els. Float­ing shops were es­tab­lished on the Ohio and its trib­utaries--flat­boats, with great cab­ins fit­ted with shelves and stocked with cloth, am­mu­ni­tion, tools, agri­cul­tur­al im­ple­ments, and the ev­er-​present whisky, which formed a prin­ci­pal sta­ple of trade along the rivers. Ap­proach­ing a clump of hous­es on the bank, the am­phibi­ous shop­keep­er would blow lusti­ly up­on a horn, and there­upon all the in­hab­itants would flock down to the banks to bar­gain for the goods that at­tract­ed them. As the pop­ula­tion in­creased the float­ing sa­loon and the float­ing gam­bling house were added to the civ­ilized ad­van­tages the riv­er bore on its bo­som. Trade was long a mere mat­ter of barter, for cur­ren­cy was sel­dom seen in these out­ly­ing set­tle­ments. Skins and agri­cul­tur­al prod­ucts were all the pur­chasers had to give, and the mer­chant start­ing from Pitts­burg with a car­go of man­ufac­tured goods, would ar­rive at New Or­leans, per­haps three months lat­er, with a cab­in filled with furs and a deck piled high with the prod­ucts of the farm. Here he would dis­pose of his car­go, per­haps for ship­ment to Eu­rope, sell his flat­boat for the lum­ber in it, and be­gin his painful way back again to the head of nav­iga­tion.

The flat­boat nev­er at­tempt­ed to re­turn against the stream. For this pur­pose keel-​boats or barges were used, great hulks about the size of a small schooner, and re­quir­ing twen­ty-​five men at the poles to push one painful­ly up stream. Three meth­ods of propul­sion were em­ployed. The “shoul­der pole,” which rest­ed on the bot­tom, and which the boat­man pushed, walk­ing from bow to stern as he did so; tow-​lines, called cordelles, and fi­nal­ly the boat was drawn along by pulling on over­hang­ing branch­es. The last method was called “bush­whack­ing.” These be­came in time the reg­ular pack­ets of the rivers, since they were not bro­ken up at the end of the voy­age and re­quired trained crews for their nav­iga­tion. The barge­men were at once the en­vy and ter­ror of the sim­ple folk along the shores. A wild, tur­bu­lent class, ready to fight and to dance, equal­ly en­rap­tured with the rough scrap­ing of a fid­dle by one of their num­ber, or the sound of the war-​whoop, which promised the on­ly less joy­ous di­ver­sion of a fight, they aroused all the in­born va­grant ten­den­cies of the river­side boys, and to run away with a flat­boat be­came, for the Ohio or In­di­ana lad, as much of an am­bi­tion as to run away to sea was for the boy of New Eng­land. It will be re­mem­bered that Abra­ham Lin­coln for a time fol­lowed the call­ing of a flat­boat­man, and made a voy­age to New Or­leans, on which he first saw slaves, and lat­er in­vent­ed a de­vice for lift­ing flat­boats over sand-​bars, the mod­el for which is still pre­served at Wash­ing­ton, though the in­dus­try it was de­signed to aid is dead. Pigs, flour, and ba­con, planks and shin­gles, ploughs, hoes, and spades, cider and whisky, were among the sim­ple ar­ti­cles dealt in by the own­ers of the barges. Their biggest mar­ket was New Or­leans, and thith­er most of their food sta­ples were car­ried, but for agri­cul­tur­al im­ple­ments and whisky there was a ready sale all along the route. Ty­ing up to trade, or to avoid the dan­ger of night nav­iga­tion, the boat­men be­came the heroes of the neigh­bor­hood. Of­ten they in­vit­ed all hands down to their boat for a dance, and by flar­ing torch­es to the notes of ac­cor­dion and fid­dle, the evening would pass in rude and harm­less jol­li­ty, un­less too many tin cups or gourds of fiery liquor ex­cit­ed the al­ways ready pug­nac­ity of the men. They were ready to brag of their val­or, and to put their boasts to the test. They were “half horse, half al­li­ga­tor,” ac­cord­ing to their own fa­vorite ex­pres­sion, equal­ly pre­pared with knife or pis­tol, fist, or the trained thumb that gouged out an an­tag­onist's eye, un­less he speed­ily called for mer­cy. “I'm a Salt Riv­er roar­er!” bawled one in the pres­ence of a for­eign di­arist. “I can out­run, out­jump, throw down, drag out and lick any man on the riv­er! I love wim­men, and I'm chock full of fight!” In ev­ery crew the “best” man was en­ti­tled to wear a feath­er or oth­er badge, and the word “best” had no ref­er­ence to moral worth, but mere­ly ex­pressed his demon­strat­ed abil­ity to whip any of his ship­mates. They had their songs, too, usu­al­ly sen­ti­men­tal, as the songs of rough men are, that they bawled out as they toiled at the sweeps or the push­poles. Some have been pre­served in his­to­ry:

"It's oh! As I was walk­ing out, One morn­ing in Ju­ly, I met a maid who axed my trade. 'A flat­boat­man,' says I.

“And it's oh! She was so neat a maid That her stock­ings and her shoes She tot­ed in her lily-​white hands, For to keep them from the dews.”

[Il­lus­tra­tion: “THE EVENING WOULD PASS IN RUDE AND HARM­LESS JOL­LI­TY.”]

Just be­low the mouth of the Wabash on the Ohio was the site of Shawnee­town, which marked the line of di­vi­sion be­tween the Ohio and the Mis­sis­sip­pi trade. Here goods and pas­sen­gers were de­barked for Illi­nois, and here the Ohio boat­men stopped be­fore be­gin­ning their re­turn trip. Be­cause of the rev­els of the boat­men, who were paid off there, the place ac­quired a rep­uta­tion akin to that which Port Said, at the north­ern en­trance to the Suez Canal, now holds. It held a high place in riv­er song and sto­ry.

“Some row up, but we row down, All the way to Shawnee­town. Pull away, pull away,”

was a fa­vorite cho­rus.

Natchez, Ten­nessee, held a like un­sa­vory rep­uta­tion among the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er boat­men, for there was the great mar­ket in which were ex­changed north­ern prod­ucts for the cot­ton, yams, and sug­ar of the rich lands of the South.

For food on the long voy­age, the boat­men re­lied most­ly on their ri­fles, but some­what on the fish that might be brought up from the depths of the tur­bid stream, and the poul­try and mut­ton which they could se­cure from the set­tlers by barter, or not in­fre­quent­ly, by theft. Wild geese were oc­ca­sion­al­ly shot from the decks, while a few hours' hunt on shore would al­most cer­tain­ly bring re­ward in the shape of wild turkey or deer. A some­what ar­cha­ic sto­ry among riv­er boat­men tells of the way in which “Mike Fink,” a fa­mous char­ac­ter among them, se­cured a sup­ply of mut­ton. See­ing a flock of sheep graz­ing near the shore, he ran his boat near them, and rubbed the noses of sev­er­al with Scotch snuff. When the poor brutes be­gan to ca­per and sneeze in dire dis­com­fort, the own­er ar­rived on the scene, and asked anx­ious­ly what could ail them. The barge­man, as a trav­eled per­son, was guide, philoso­pher, and friend to all along the riv­er, and so, when in­formed that his sheep were suf­fer­ing from black mur­rain, and that all would be in­fect­ed un­less those al­ready af­flict­ed were killed, the farmer un­ques­tion­ing­ly shot those that showed the strange symp­toms, and threw the bod­ies in­to the riv­er, whence they were present­ly col­lect­ed by the as­tute “Mike,” and turned in­to fair mut­ton for him­self and pas­sen­gers. Such ex­ploits as these added might­ily to the re­pute of the river­men for shrewd­ness, and the farmer who suf­fered re­ceived scant sym­pa­thy from his neigh­bors.

But the boat­men them­selves had dan­gers to meet, and rob­bers to evade or to out­wit. At any time the lurk­ing In­di­an on the banks might send a death-​deal­ing ar­row or bul­let from some thick­et, for pure love of slaugh­ter. For a time it was a fa­vorite ruse of hos­tiles, who had se­cured a white cap­tive, to send him alone to the riv­er's edge, un­der threat of tor­ture, there to plead with out­stretched hands for aid from the pass­ing raft. But woe to the mariner who was moved by the ap­peal, for back of the un­for­tu­nate, hid­den in the bush­es, lay am­bushed sav­ages, ready to leap up­on any who came ashore on the er­rand of mer­cy, and in the end nei­ther vic­tim nor de­coy es­caped the fullest in­flic­tion of red­skin bar­bar­ity. There were white out­laws along the rivers, too; land pi­rates ready to rob and mur­der when op­por­tu­ni­ty of­fered, and as the Span­ish ter­ri­to­ry about New Or­leans was en­tered, the dan­gers mul­ti­plied. The ad­ver­tise­ment of a line of pack­ets sets forth:

“No dan­ger need be ap­pre­hend­ed from the en­emy, as ev­ery per­son what­ev­er will be un­der cov­er, made proof against ri­fle or mus­ket balls, and con­ve­nient port­holes for fir­ing out of. Each of the boats are armed with six pieces, car­ry­ing a pound ball, al­so a num­ber of mus­kets, and am­ply sup­plied with am­mu­ni­tion, strong­ly manned with choice hands, and mas­ters of ap­proved knowl­edge.”

The En­glish of the ad­ver­tise­ment is not of the most lu­mi­nous char­ac­ter, yet it suf­fices to tell clear­ly enough to any one of imag­ina­tion, the sto­ry of some of the dan­gers that be­set those who drift­ed from Ohio to New Or­leans.

The low­er reach­es of the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er bore among river­men, dur­ing the ear­ly days of the cen­tu­ry, very much such a rep­uta­tion as the Span­ish Main bore among the peace­ful mariners of the At­lantic trade. They were the haunts of pi­rates and buc­ca­neers, most­ly or­di­nary cheap free­boot­ers, op­er­at­ing from the shore with a few skiffs, or a lug­ger, per­haps, who would dash out up­on a pass­ing ves­sel, loot it, and turn it adrift. But one gang of these riv­er pi­rates so grew in pow­er and au­dac­ity, and its lead­ers so ram­ified their as­so­ci­ations and their busi­ness re­la­tions, as for a time to be­come a re­al­ly in­flu­en­tial fac­tor in the gov­ern­ment of New Or­leans, while for a term of years they even put the au­thor­ity of the Unit­ed States at nought. The sto­ry of the broth­ers Lafitte and their nest of crim­inals at Barataria, is one of the most pic­turesque in Amer­ican an­nals. On a group of those small is­lands crowned with live-​oaks and with frond­ed palms, in that strange wa­ter­logged coun­try to the south­west of the Cres­cent City, where the sea, the bay­ou, and the marsh fade one in­to the oth­er un­til the line of de­marka­tion can scarce­ly be traced, the Lafittes es­tab­lished their colony. There they built cab­ins and store­hous­es, threw up-​earth­works, and armed them with stolen can­non. In time the plun­der of scores of ves­sels filled the ware­hous­es with the goods of all na­tions, and as the wealth of the colony grew its num­bers in­creased. To it were at­tract­ed the ad­ven­tur­ous spir­its of the cre­ole city. Men of Span­ish and of French de­scent, ne­groes, and quadroons, West In­di­ans from all the is­lands scat­tered be­tween North and South Amer­ica, birds of prey, and fugi­tives from jus­tice of all sorts and kinds, made that a place of refuge. They brought their wom­en and chil­dren, and their slaves, and the place be­came a small prin­ci­pal­ity, know­ing no law save Lafitte's will. With a fleet of small schooners the pi­rates would sal­ly out in­to the Gulf and plun­der ves­sels of what­ev­er sort they might en­counter. The road to their hid­ing-​place was dif­fi­cult to fol­low, ei­ther in boats or afoot, for the tor­tu­ous bay­ous that led to it were in­ter­twined in an al­most in­ex­tri­ca­ble maze, through which, in­deed, the trained pi­lots of the colony picked their way with ease, but along which no un­trained helms­man could fol­low them. If at­tack were made by land, the march­ing force was con­front­ed by im­pass­able rivers and swamps; if by boats, the in­vaders press­ing up a chan­nel which seemed to promise suc­cess, would find them­selves sud­den­ly in a blind al­ley, with noth­ing to do save to re­trace their course. Mean­while, for the greater con­ve­nience of the pi­rates, a sys­tem of la­goons, well known to them, and eas­ily nav­igat­ed in lug­gers, led to the very back door of New Or­leans, the mar­ket for their plun­der. Of the broth­ers Lafitte, one held state in the city as a suc­cess­ful mer­chant, a man not with­out in­flu­ence with the city gov­ern­ment, of high stand­ing in the busi­ness com­mu­ni­ty, and in thor­ough­ly good re­pute. Yet he was, in fact, the agent for the pi­rate colony, and the goods he dealt in were those which the pic­turesque ruf­fi­ans of Barataria had stolen from the ves­sels about the mouth of the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er. The sit­ua­tion per­sist­ed for near­ly half a score of years. If there were mer­chants, im­porters and shipown­ers in New Or­leans who suf­fered by it, there were oth­ers who prof­it­ed by it, and it has usu­al­ly been the case that a crime or an in­jus­tice by which any con­sid­er­able num­ber of peo­ple prof­it, be­comes a sort of vest­ed right, hard to dis­turb. And, in­deed, the Baratar­ians were not with­out a cer­tain rude sense of pa­tri­otism and loy­al­ty to the Unit­ed States, whose laws they per­sis­tent­ly vi­olat­ed. For when the sec­ond war with Great Britain was de­clared and Pack­en­ham was dis­patched to take New Or­leans, the com­man­der of the British fleet made over­tures to Lafitte and his men, promis­ing them a lib­er­al sub­sidy and full par­don for all past of­fens­es, if they would but act as his al­lies and guide the British in­vaders to the most vul­ner­able point in the de­fens­es of the Cres­cent City. The of­fer was re­fused, and in­stead, the chief men of the pi­rate colony went straight­way to New Or­leans to put Jack­son on his guard, and when the op­pos­ing forces met on the plains of Chal­mette, the very cen­ter of the Amer­ican line was held by Do­minique Yon, with a band of his swarthy Baratar­ians, with how­itzers which they them­selves had dragged from their pi­rate stronghold to train up­on the British. Many of us, how­ev­er law-​abid­ing, will feel a cer­tain sense that the ro­mance of his­to­ry would have been bet­ter served, if af­ter this act of pa­tri­otism, the pi­rates had been at least peace­ful­ly dis­persed. But they were wed­ded to their preda­to­ry life, re­turned with re­newed zeal to their pira­cies, and were fi­nal­ly de­stroyed by the State forces and a Unit­ed States naval ex­pe­di­tion, which burned their set­tle­ment, freed their slaves, razed their for­ti­fi­ca­tions, con­fis­cat­ed their can­non, killed many of their peo­ple, and dis­persed the rest among the swamps and forests of south­ern Louisiana.

In 1809 a New York man, by name Nicholas J. Roo­sevelt, set out from Pitts­burg in a flat­boat of the usu­al type, to make the voy­age to New Or­leans. He car­ried no car­go of goods for sale, nor did he con­vey any band of in­tend­ed set­tlers, yet his jour­ney was on­ly sec­ond in im­por­tance to the ill-​fat­ed one, in which the luck­less Amis proved that New Or­leans must be Unit­ed States ter­ri­to­ry, or the wealth of the great in­te­ri­or plateau would be ef­fec­tive­ly bot­tled up. For Roo­sevelt was the part­ner of Ful­ton and Liv­ingston in their new steam­boat en­ter­prise, hav­ing him­self sug­gest­ed the ver­ti­cal pad­dle-​wheel, which for more than a half a cen­tu­ry was the fa­vorite means of uti­liz­ing steam pow­er for the propul­sion of boats. He was firm in the be­lief that the great­est fu­ture for the steam­boat was on the great rivers that tied to­geth­er the rapid­ly grow­ing com­mon­wealths of the mid­dle west, and he un­der­took this voy­age for the pur­pose of study­ing the chan­nel and the cur­rent of the rivers, with the view to putting a steam­er on them. Wise men as­sured him that on the up­per riv­er his scheme was des­tined to fail­ure. Could a boat laden with a heavy en­gine be made of so light a draught as to pass over the shal­lows of the Ohio? Could it run the falls at Louisville, or be dragged around them as the flat­boats of­ten were? Clear­ly not. The on­ly re­al­ly ser­vice­able type of riv­er craft was the flat­boat, for it would go where there was wa­ter enough for a muskrat to swim in, would glide un­scathed over the con­cealed snag or, thrust­ing its cor­ner in­to the soft mud of some pro­trud­ing bank, swing around and go on as well stern first as be­fore. The flat­boat was the sum of hu­man in­ge­nu­ity ap­plied to riv­er nav­iga­tion. Even barges were prov­ing fail­ures and pass­ing in­to dis­use, as the cost of pol­ing them up­stream was greater than any prof­it to be reaped from the voy­age. Could a boat laden with thou­sands of pounds of ma­chin­ery make her way north­ward against that swift cur­rent? And if not, could steam­boat men be con­tin­ual­ly tak­ing ex­pen­sive en­gines down to New Or­leans and aban­don­ing them there, as the old-​time riv­er men did their rafts and scows? Clear­ly not. So Roo­sevelt's ap­pear­ance on the riv­er did not in any way dis­qui­et the flat­boat­men, though it por­tend­ed their dis­ap­pear­ance as a class. Roo­sevelt, how­ev­er, was in no wise dis­cour­aged. Week af­ter week he drift­ed along the Ohio and Mis­sis­sip­pi, tak­ing de­tailed sound­ings, study­ing the course of the cur­rent, not­ing the sup­ply of fu­el along the banks, ob­serv­ing the course of the rafts and flat­boats as they drift­ed along at the mer­cy of the tide. Noth­ing es­caped his at­ten­tion, and yet it may well be doubt­ed whether the mass of da­ta he col­lect­ed was in fact of any prac­ti­cal val­ue, for the great riv­er is the least un­der­stand­able of streams. Its chan­nel is as shift­ing as the mists above Ni­agara. Where yes­ter­day the biggest boat on the riv­er, deep laden with cot­ton, might pass with safe­ty, there may be to-​day a sand-​bar scarce­ly hid­den be­neath the tide. Its banks change over night in form and in ap­pear­ance. In time of flood it cuts new chan­nels for it­self, leav­ing in a few days riv­er towns far in the in­te­ri­or, and sud­den­ly giv­ing a wa­ter frontage to some plan­ta­tion whose own­er had for years mourned over his dis­tance from the riv­er bank. Capri­cious and ir­re­sistible, work­ing in­sid­ious­ly night and day, sel­dom show­ing the progress of its en­deav­ors un­til some huge slice of land, acres in ex­tent, crum­bles in­to the flood, or some gul­ly or cut-​off all at once ap­pears as the main chan­nel, the Mis­sis­sip­pi, even now when the Gov­ern­ment is at all times on the alert to hold it in bounds, is not to be light­ly learned nor long trust­ed. In Roo­sevelt's time, be­fore the days of the riv­er com­mis­sion, it must have been still more dif­fi­cult to com­pre­hend. Nev­er­the­less, the in­for­ma­tion he col­lect­ed, sat­is­fied him that the stream was nav­iga­ble for steam­ers, and his re­port de­ter­mined his part­ners to build the pi­oneer craft at Pitts­burg. She was com­plet­ed, “built af­ter the fash­ion of a ship with port­holes in her side,” says a writ­er of the time, dubbed the “Or­leans,” and in 1812 reached the city on the sod­den prairies near the mouth of the Mis­sis­sip­pi, whose name we now take as a syn­onym for quaint­ness, but which at that time had seem­ing­ly the best chance to be­come a ri­val of Lon­don and Liv­er­pool, of any Amer­ican town. For just then the great pos­si­bil­ities of the riv­er high­way were be­com­ing ap­par­ent. The val­ley was fill­ing up with farm­ers, and their pro­duce sought the short­est way to tide-​wa­ter. The streets of the city were crowd­ed with flat­boat­men, from In­di­ana, Ohio, and Ken­tucky, and with sailors speak­ing strange tongues, and gath­ered from all the ports of the world. At the broad lev­ee float­ed the ships of all na­tions. All man­ual work was done by the ne­gro slaves, and al­ready the planters were be­gin­ning to show signs of that prodi­gal pros­per­ity, which, in the flush times, made New Or­leans the gayest city in the Unit­ed States. In 1813 Jack­son put the fi­nal seal on the ti­tle-​deeds to New Or­leans, and made the Mis­sis­sip­pi for­ev­er an Amer­ican riv­er by de­feat­ing the British just out­side the city's walls, and then riv­er com­merce grew apace. In 1817 fif­teen hun­dred flat­boats and five hun­dred barges tied up to the lev­ee. By that time the steam­boat had proved her case, for the “New Or­leans” had run for years be­tween Natchez and the Louisiana city, charg­ing a fare of eigh­teen dol­lars for the down, and twen­ty-​five dol­lars for the up trip, and earn­ing for her own­ers twen­ty thou­sand dol­lars prof­its in one year. She was snagged and lost in 1814, but by that time oth­ers were in the field, first of all the “Comet,” a stern-​wheel­er of twen­ty-​five tons, built at Pitts­burg, and en­ter­ing the New Or­leans-​Natchez trade in 1814. The “Vesu­vius,” and the “AEt­na.”--vol­canic names which sug­gest­ed the ex­plo­sive end of too many of the ear­ly boats--were next in the field, and the lat­ter won fame by be­ing the first boat to make the up trip from New Or­leans to Louisville. An­oth­er steam­boat, the “En­ter­prise,” car­ried a car­go of, pow­der and ball from Pitts­burg to Gen­er­al Jack­son at New Or­leans, and af­ter some ser­vice on south­ern wa­ters, made the re­turn trip to Louisville in twen­ty-​five days. This was a great achieve­ment, and hailed by the peo­ple of the Ken­tucky town as the cer­tain fore­run­ner of com­mer­cial great­ness, for at one time there were tied to the bank the “En­ter­prise” from New Or­leans, the “Despatch” from Pitts­burg, and the “Ken­tucky Eliz­abeth” from the up­per Ken­tucky Riv­er. Nev­er had the set­tle­ment seemed to be so thor­ough­ly in the heart of the con­ti­nent. There­after riv­er steam­boat­ing grew so fast that by 1819 six­ty-​three steam­ers, of vary­ing ton­nage from twen­ty to three hun­dred tons, were ply­ing on the west­ern rivers. Four had been built at New Or­leans, one each at Philadel­phia, New York, and Prov­idence, and fifty-​six on the Ohio. The up­per reach­es of the Mis­sis­sip­pi still lagged in the race, for most of the boats turned off up the Ohio Riv­er, in­to the more pop­ulous ter­ri­to­ry to­ward the east. It was not un­til Au­gust, 1817, that the “Gen­er­al Pike,” the first steam­er ev­er to as­cend the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er above the mouth of the Ohio, reached St. Louis. No pic­tures, and but scant de­scrip­tions of this pi­oneer craft, are ob­tain­able at the present time. From old let­ters it is learned that she was built on the mod­el of a barge, with her cab­in sit­uat­ed on the low­er deck, so that its top scarce­ly showed above the bul­warks. She had a low-​pres­sure en­gine, which at times proved in­ad­equate to stem the cur­rent, and in such a cri­sis the crew got out their shoul­der poles and pushed her painful­ly up stream, as had been the prac­tice so many years with the barges. At night she tied up to the bank. On­ly one oth­er steam­er reached St. Louis in the same twelve months. By way of con­trast to this pic­ture of the ear­ly be­gin­nings of riv­er nav­iga­tion on the up­per Mis­sis­sip­pi, we may set over some facts drawn from re­cent of­fi­cial pub­li­ca­tions con­cern­ing the vol­ume of riv­er traf­fic, of which St. Louis is now the ad­mit­ted cen­ter. In 1890 11,000,000 pas­sen­gers were car­ried in steam­boats on rivers of the Mis­sis­sip­pi sys­tem. The Ohio and its trib­utaries, ac­cord­ing to the cen­sus of that year, car­ried over 15,000,000 tons of freight an­nu­al­ly, main­ly coal, grain, lum­ber, iron, and steel. The Mis­sis­sip­pi car­ries about the same amount of freight, though on its tur­bid tide, cot­ton and sug­ar, in no small de­gree, take the place of grain and the prod­ucts of the fur­naces and mills.

But it was a long time be­fore steam nav­iga­tion ap­proached any­thing like these fig­ures, and in­deed, many years passed be­fore the flat­boat and the barge saw their doom, and dis­ap­peared. In 1821, ten years af­ter the first steam­boat ar­rived at New Or­leans, there was still record­ed in the an­nals of the town, the ar­rival of four hun­dred and forty-​one flat­boats, and one hun­dred and sev­en­ty-​four barges. But two hun­dred and eighty-​sev­en steam­boats al­so tied up to the lev­ee that year, and the end of the flat­boat days was in sight. Nine­ty-​five of the new type of ves­sels were in ser­vice on the Mis­sis­sip­pi and its trib­utaries, and five were at Mo­bile mak­ing short voy­ages on the Mis­sis­sip­pi Sound and out in­to the Gulf. They were but poor types of ves­sels at best. At first the short­est voy­age up the riv­er from New Or­leans to Ship­ping­port--then a fa­mous land­ing, now van­ished from the map--was twen­ty-​two days, and it took ten days to come down. With­in six years the mod­els of the boats and the pow­er of the en­gines had been so great­ly im­proved that the up trip was made in twelve days, and the down in six. Even the towns on the small­er streams trib­utary to the great riv­er, had their own fleets. Six­teen ves­sels plied be­tween Nashville and New Or­leans. The Red Riv­er, and even the Mis­souri, be­gan to echo to the puff­ing of the ex­haust and the shriek of the steam-​whis­tle. In­deed, it was not very long be­fore the Mis­souri Riv­er be­came as im­por­tant a path­way for the troops of em­igrants mak­ing for the great west­ern plains and in time for the gold fields of Cal­ifor­nia, as the Ohio had been in the open­ing days of the cen­tu­ry for the pi­oneers bent up­on open­ing up the Mis­sis­sip­pi Val­ley. The sto­ry of the Mis­souri Riv­er voy­age, the land­ing place at West­port, now trans­formed in­to the great bustling city of Kansas City, and all the at­ten­dant in­ci­dents which led up to the con­test in Kansas and Ne­bras­ka, forms one of the most in­ter­est­ing, and not the least im­por­tant chap­ters in the his­to­ry of our na­tion­al de­vel­op­ment.

The decade dur­ing which the steam­boats and the flat­boats still strug­gled for the mas­tery, was the most pic­turesque pe­ri­od of Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er life. Then the riv­er towns throve most, and waxed tur­bu­lent, noisy, and big, ac­cord­ing to the stan­dards of the times. Places which now are mere names on the map, or have even dis­ap­peared from the map al­to­geth­er, were great trans-​ship­ping points for goods on the way to the sea. New Madrid, for ex­am­ple, which nowa­days we re­mem­ber chiefly as be­ing one of the stub­born ob­sta­cles in the way of the Union open­ing of the riv­er in the dark days of the Civ­il War, was in 1826 like a sea­port. Flat­boats in groups and fleets came drift­ing to its lev­ees heavy laden with the prod­ucts of the west and south, the out­put of the north­ern farms and mills, and the south­ern plan­ta­tions. On the crowd­ed riv­er bank would be dis­em­barked goods drawn from far-​off New Eng­land, which had been dragged over the moun­tains and sent down the Ohio to the Mis­sis­sip­pi; furs from north­ern Min­neso­ta or Wis­con­sin; lum­ber in the rough, or shaped in­to planks, from the mills along the Ohio; whisky from Ken­tucky, pork and flour from Illi­nois, cat­tle, hors­es, hemp, fab­rics, to­bac­co, ev­ery­thing that men at home or abroad, could need or crave, was gath­ered up by en­ter­pris­ing traders along three thou­sand miles of wa­ter­way, and brought hith­er by clum­sy rafts and flat­boats, and scarce­ly less clum­sy steam­boats, for dis­tri­bu­tion up and down oth­er rivers, and ship­ment to for­eign lands.

At New Or­leans there was a like de­posit of all the prod­ucts of that rich val­ley, an em­pire in it­self. There grain, cot­ton, lum­ber, live stock, furs, the out­put of the farms and the spoils of the chase, were trans­ferred to ocean-​go­ing ships and sent to for­eign mar­kets. Spec­ula­tive spir­its planned for the day, when this re­han­dling of car­goes at the Cres­cent City would be no longer nec­es­sary, but ships would clear from Louisville or St. Louis to Liv­er­pool or Ham­burg di­rect. A fine type of the Amer­ican sailor, Com­modore Whip­ple, who had won his ti­tle by good sea-​fight­ing in the Rev­olu­tion­ary War, gave great en­cour­age­ment to this hope, in 1800, by tak­ing the full-​rigged ship “St. Clair,” with a car­go of pork and flour, from Ma­ri­et­ta, Ohio, down the Ohio, over the falls at Louisville, thence down the Mis­sis­sip­pi, and round by sea to Ha­vana, and so on to Philadel­phia. This re­al­ly no­table ex­ploit--to the suc­cess of which good luck con­tribut­ed al­most as much as good sea­man­ship--aroused the great­est en­thu­si­asm. The Com­modore re­turned home over­land, from Philadel­phia. His progress, slow enough, at best, was checked by ova­tions, com­pli­men­ta­ry ad­dress­es, and ex­tem­po­rized ban­quets. He was _the_ man of the mo­ment. The po­et­asters, who were quite as nu­mer­ous in the ear­ly days of the re­pub­lic, as the true po­ets were scarce, sig­nal­ized his ex­ploit in verse.

"The Tri­ton cri­eth, 'Who cometh now from shore?' Nep­tune repli­eth, ''Tis the old Com­modore. Long has it been since I saw him be­fore. In the year '75 from Columbia he came, The pride of the Briton, on ocean to tame.

* * * * *

“'But now he comes from west­ern woods, De­scend­ing slow, with gen­tle floods, The pi­oneer of a mighty train, Which com­merce brings to my do­main.'”

But Nep­tune and the Tri­ton had no fur­ther oc­ca­sion to ex­change notes of as­ton­ish­ment up­on the ap­pear­ance of riv­er-​built ships on the ocean. The “St. Clair” was the first and last ex­per­iment of the sort. Late in the nineties, the Unit­ed States Gov­ern­ment tried build­ing a tor­pe­do-​boat at Dubuque for ocean ser­vice, but the re­sult was not en­cour­ag­ing.

Year af­ter year the steam­boats mul­ti­plied, not on­ly on the rivers of the West, but on those lead­ing from the At­lantic seaboard in­to the in­te­ri­or. It may be said just­ly that the ap­pli­ca­tion of steam to pur­pos­es of nav­iga­tion made the Amer­ican peo­ple face fair­ly about. Long they had stood, look­ing out­ward, gaz­ing across the sea to Eu­rope, their sole mar­ket, both for buy­ing and for sell­ing. But now the rich lands be­yond the moun­tains, invit­ing set­tlers, and cut up by streams which of­fered paths for the most rapid and com­fort­able method of trans­porta­tion then known, com­mand­ed their at­ten­tion. Im­mi­grants no longer stopped in stony New Eng­land, or in Vir­ginia, al­ready dom­inat­ed by an aris­to­crat­ic land-​own­ing class, but pressed on to Ken­tucky, Ohio, Ten­nessee, and Illi­nois. As the lands filled up, the lit­tle steam­ers pushed their noses up new streams, seek­ing new mar­kets. The Cum­ber­land, and the Ten­nessee, the Mis­souri, the Arkansas, the Red, the Tombig­bee, and the Chat­ta­hoochee were stirred by the churn­ing wheels, and over-​their forests float­ed the mourn­ful sough of the high-​pres­sure ex­haust.

In 1840, a count kept at Cairo, showed 4566 ves­sels had passed that point dur­ing the year. By 1848, a “ban­ner” year, in the his­to­ry of nav­iga­tion on the Mis­sis­sip­pi, traf­fic was record­ed thus:

25 ves­sels ply­ing be­tween Louisville, New Or­leans and Cincin­nati 8,484 tons 7 be­tween Nashville and New Or­leans 2,585 tons 4 be­tween Flo­rence and New Or­leans 1,617 tons 4 in St. Louis lo­cal trade 1,001 tons 7 in lo­cal cot­ton trade 2,016 tons Riv­er “tramps” and un­clas­si­fied 23,206 tons

It may be not­ed that in all the years of the de­vel­op­ment of the Mis­sis­sip­pi ship­ping, there was com­par­ative­ly lit­tle in­crease in the size of the in­di­vid­ual boats. The “Vesu­vius,” built in 1814, was 480 tons bur­then, 160 feet long, 28.6 feet beam, and drew from five to six feet. The biggest boats of lat­er years were but lit­tle larg­er.

[Il­lus­tra­tion: THE MIS­SIS­SIP­PI PI­LOT]

The aris­to­crat of the Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er steam­boat was the pi­lot. To him all men de­ferred. So far as the riv­er ser­vice fur­nished a par­al­lel to the au­to­crat­ic au­thor­ity of the sea-​go­ing cap­tain or mas­ter, he was it. All mat­ters per­tain­ing to the nav­iga­tion of the boat were in his do­main, and right zeal­ous­ly he guard­ed his au­thor­ity and his dig­ni­ty. The cap­tain might de­ter­mine such triv­ial mat­ters as hir­ing or dis­charg­ing men, buy­ing fu­el, or con­tract­ing for freight; the clerk might lord it over the pas­sen­gers, and the mate dom­ineer over the black roustabouts; but the pi­lot moved along in a sort of iso­lat­ed grandeur, the true monarch of all he sur­veyed. If, in his judg­ment the course of wis­dom was to tie up to an old sycamore tree on the bank and re­main mo­tion­less all night, the boat tied up. The grum­blings of pas­sen­gers and the dis­ap­proval of the cap­tain availed naught, nor did the cap­tain of­ten ven­ture up­on ei­ther crit­icism or sug­ges­tion to the lord­ly pi­lot, who was prone to re­sent such in­va­sion of his dig­ni­ty in ways that made trou­ble. In­deed, dur­ing the flush times on the Mis­sis­sip­pi, the pi­lots were a body of men pos­sess­ing painful­ly ac­quired knowl­edge and skill, and so or­ga­nized as to pro­tect all the priv­ileges which their at­tain­ments should win for them. The abil­ity to “run” the great riv­er from St. Louis to New Or­leans was not light­ly won, nor, for that mat­ter, eas­ily re­tained, for the Mis­sis­sip­pi is ev­er a fick­le flood, with chang­ing land­marks and shift­ing chan­nel. In all the great vol­ume of lit­er­ature bear­ing on the sto­ry of the riv­er, the dif­fi­cul­ties of its con­quest are nowhere so tru­ly re­count­ed as in Mark Twain's _Life on the Mis­sis­sip­pi_, the hu­mor­ous qual­ity of which does not ob­scure, but rather en­hances its val­ue as a pic­turesque and truth­ful sto­ry of the old-​time pi­lot's life. The pi­lot be­gan his work in boy­hood as a “cub” to a li­censed pi­lot. His du­ties ranged from bring­ing re­fresh­ments up to the pi­lot-​house, to hold­ing the wheel when some straight stretch or clear, deep chan­nel of­fered his mas­ter a chance to leave his post for a few min­utes. For strain on the mem­ory, his ed­uca­tion is com­pa­ra­ble on­ly to the Chi­nese sys­tem of lib­er­al cul­ture, which com­pre­hends learn­ing by rote some tens of thou­sands of vers­es from the works of Con­fu­cius and oth­er philoso­phers of the far East. Be­gin­ning at New Or­leans, he had to com­mit to mem­ory the name and ap­pear­ance of ev­ery point of land, in­let, riv­er or bay­ou mouth, “cut-​off,” light, plan­ta­tion and ham­let on ei­ther bank of the riv­er all the way to St. Louis. Then, he had to learn them all in their op­po­site or­der, quite an in­de­pen­dent task, as all of us who learned the mul­ti­pli­ca­tion ta­ble back­ward in the days of our youth, will read­ily un­der­stand. These land­marks it was need­ful for him to rec­og­nize by day and by night, through fog or driv­ing rain, when the riv­er was swollen by spring floods, or shrunk in sum­mer to a yel­low rib­bon me­an­der­ing through a Sa­hara of sand. He had need to rec­og­nize at a glance the rip­ple on the wa­ter that told of a lurk­ing sand-​bar and dis­tin­guish it from the al­most iden­ti­cal rip­ple that a brisk breeze would raise. Most per­plex­ing of the per­ils that be­set riv­er nav­iga­tion are the “snags,” or sunken logs that of­ten ob­struct the chan­nel. Some tow­er­ing oak or pine, grow­ing in lusty strength for its half-​cen­tu­ry or more by the brink of the up­per reach­es of one of the Mis­sis­sip­pi sys­tem would, in time, be un­der­mined by the flood and fall in­to the rush­ing tide. For weeks it would be rolled along the shal­lows; its leaves and twigs rot­ting off, its small­er branch­es break­ing short, un­til at last, hun­dreds of miles, per­haps, be­low the scene of its fall, it would lodge fair in the chan­nel. The gnarled and mat­ted mass of boughs would or­di­nar­ily cling like an an­chor to the sandy bot­tom, while the buoy­ant trunk, as though strug­gling to break away, would strain up­ward oblique­ly to with­in a few inch­es of the sur­face of the mud­dy wa­ter, which--too thick to drink and too thin to plough, as the old say­ing went--gave no hint of this con­cealed per­il; but the boat run­ning fair­ly up­on it, would have her bows stove in and go quick­ly to the bot­tom. Af­ter the Unit­ed States took con­trol of the riv­er and be­gan spend­ing its mil­lions an­nu­al­ly in im­prov­ing it for nav­iga­tion and pro­tect­ing the sur­round­ing coun­try against its over­flows, “snag-​boats” were put on the riv­er, equipped with spe­cial ma­chin­ery for drag­ging these fall­en for­est gi­ants from the chan­nel, so that of late years ac­ci­dents from this cause have been rare. But for many years the river­man's chief re­liance was that cu­ri­ous in­stinct or sec­ond sight which en­abled the trained pi­lot to pick his way along the most tor­tu­ous chan­nel in the dens­est fog, or to find the land­ing of some ob­scure plan­ta­tion on a night black­er than the black­est of the roustabouts, who moved live­ly to the in­ces­sant curs­ing of the mate.

The Mis­sis­sip­pi Riv­er steam­boat of the gold­en age on the riv­er--the type, in­deed, which still per­sists--was a tri­umph of adapt­abil­ity to the ser­vice for which she was de­signed. More than this--she was an egre­gious ar­chi­tec­tural sham. She was a suc­cess in her light draught, six to eight feet, at most, and in her prodi­gious car­ry­ing ca­pac­ity. It was said of one of these boats, when skil­ful­ly load­ed by a gang of prac­ti­cal roustabouts, un­der the di­rec­tion of an ex­pe­ri­enced mate, that the freight she car­ried, if un­load­ed on the bank, would make a pile big­ger than the boat her­self. The hull of the ves­sel was in­vari­ably of wood, broad of beam, light of draught, built “to run on a heavy dew,” and with on­ly the rudi­ments of a keel. Some freight was stowed in the hold, but the en­gines were not placed there, but on the main deck, built al­most flush with the wa­ter, and ex­tend­ing un­bro­ken from stem to stern. Of­ten the en­gines were in pairs, so that the great pad­dle-​wheels could be worked in­de­pen­dent­ly of each oth­er. The finest and fastest boats were side-​wheel­ers, but a large wheel at the stern, or two stern wheels, side by side, ca­pa­ble of in­de­pen­dent ac­tion, were com­mon modes of propul­sion. The es­cape-​pipes of the en­gine were car­ried high aloft, above the top­most of the tiers of decks, and from each one al­ter­nate­ly, when the boat was un­der way, would burst a gush of steam, with a sound like a dull puff, fol­lowed by a pro­longed sigh, which could be heard far away be­yond the dense forests that bor­dered the riv­er. A row of posts, al­ways in ap­pear­ance, too slen­der for the load they bore, sup­port­ed the sa­loon deck some fif­teen feet above the main deck. When busi­ness was good on the riv­er, the space with­in was packed tight with freight, leav­ing bare­ly room enough for pas­sen­ger gang­ways, and for the men feed­ing the roar­ing fur­naces with pine slabs. A great steam­er com­ing down to New Or­leans from the cot­ton coun­try about the Red Riv­er, load­ed to the wa­ter's edge with cot­ton bales, so that, from the shore, she looked her­self like a mon­ster cot­ton bale, sur­mount­ed by tiers of snowy cab­ins and pour­ing forth steam and smoke from tow­er­ing pipes, was a sight long to be re­mem­bered. It is a sight, too, that is still com­mon on the low­er riv­er, where the busi­ness of gath­er­ing up the planter's crop and get­ting it to mar­ket has not yet passed whol­ly in­to the hands of the rail­roads.

[Il­lus­tra­tion: A DECK LOAD OF COT­TON]

Above the car­go and the roar­ing fur­naces rose the cab­ins, two or three tiers, one atop the oth­er, the top­most one ex­tend­ing on­ly about one-​third of the length of the boat, and called the “Texas.” The main sa­loon ex­tend­ing the whole length of the boat, save for a bit of open deck at bow and stern, was in com­par­ison with the av­er­age house of the time, pala­tial. On ei­ther side it was lined by rows of doors, each open­ing in­to a two-​berthed state­room. The dec­ora­tion was usu­al­ly ivory white, and on the main pan­el of each door was an oil paint­ing of some ro­man­tic land­scape. There Chillon brood­ed over the placid azure of the lake, there storms broke with jagged light­ning in the An­des, there bux­om girls trod out the pur­ple grapes of some Ital­ian vine­yard. The builders of each new steam­er strove to eclipse all ear­li­er ones in the bril­lian­cy of these works of art, and dis­cus­sion of the rel­ative mer­its of the paint­ings on the “Natchez” and those on the “Ba­ton Rouge” came to be the chief theme of art crit­icism along the riv­er. Bright crim­son car­pet usu­al­ly cov­ered the floor of the long, tun­nel-​like cab­in. Down the cen­ter were ranged the ta­bles, about which, thrice a day, the hun­gry pas­sen­gers gath­ered to be fed, while from the ceil­ing de­pend­ed chan­de­liers, from which hung pris­mat­ic pen­dants, tin­kling pleas­ant­ly as the boat vi­brat­ed with the throb of her en­gines. At one end of the main sa­loon was the ladies' cab­in, dis­creet­ly cut off by crim­son cur­tains; at the oth­er, the bar, which, in a pe­ri­od when co­pi­ous li­ba­tions of al­co­holic drinks were at least as cus­tom­ary for men as the cigar to-​day, was usu­al­ly a ral­ly­ing point for the male pas­sen­gers.

Far up above the yel­low riv­er, perched on top of the “Texas,” or top­most tier of cab­ins, was the pi­lot-​house, that hon­or­able em­inence of glass and paint­ed wood which it was the am­bi­tion of ev­ery boy along the riv­er some day to oc­cu­py. This was a great square box, walled in main­ly with glass. Square across the front of it rose the huge wheel, eight feet in di­am­eter, some­times half-​sunken be­neath the floor, so that the pi­lot, in mo­ments of stress, might not on­ly grip it with his hands, but stand on its spokes, as well. Easy chairs and a long bench made up the fur­ni­ture of this sa­cred apart­ment. In front of it rose the two tow­er­ing iron chim­neys, joined, near the top by an iron grat­ing that usu­al­ly car­ried some gaudi­ly col­ored or gild­ed de­vice in­dica­tive of the line to which the boat be­longed. Amid­ships, and aft of the pi­lot-​house, rose the two es­cape pipes, from which the hoarse, pro­longed s-​o-​o-​ugh of the high pres­sure ex­haust burst at half-​minute in­ter­vals, car­ry­ing to lis­ten­ers miles away, the news that a boat was com­ing.

All this ed­ifice above the hull of the boat, was of the flim­si­est con­struc­tion, built of pine scant­ling, lib­er­al­ly dec­orat­ed with scroll-​saw work, and lav­ish­ly cov­ered with paint mixed with lin­seed oil. Be­neath it were two, four, or six roar­ing fur­naces fed with rich pitch-​pine, and open on ev­ery side to drafts and gusts. From the top of the great chim­neys poured vol­canic show­ers of sparks, del­ug­ing the in­flammable pile with a fiery rain. The mar­vel is not that ev­ery year saw its quo­tum of steam­ers burned to the wa­ter's edge, but, rather, that the quo­ta were pro­por­tion­ate­ly so small.

At mid­night this ap­par­ent in­flamma­bil­ity was even more strik­ing. Lights shone from the win­dows of the long row of cab­ins, and wher­ev­er there was a chink, or a bit of glass, or a lat­ticed blind, the ra­di­ance streamed forth as though with­in were a great mass of fire, strug­gling, in ev­ery way, to es­cape. Be­low, the boil­er deck was dul­ly il­lu­mined by smoky lanterns; but when one of the great doors of the roar­ing fur­nace was thrown open, that the half-​naked black fire­men might throw in more pitch-​pine slabs, there shone forth such a fiery glare, that the boat and the ma­chin­ery--work­ing in the open, and plain to view--seemed wrapped in a Vesu­vius of flame, and the stur­dy stok­ers and loung­ing roustabouts looked like the fiends in a fiery in­fer­no. The dan­ger was not mere­ly ap­par­ent, but very re­al. Dur­ing the ear­ly days of steam­boat­ing, fires and boil­er ex­plo­sions were of fre­quent oc­cur­rence. A riv­er boat, once ablaze, could nev­er be saved, and the one hope for the pas­sen­gers was that it might be beached be­fore the flames drove them over­board. The en­deav­or to do this brought out some ex­am­ples of mag­nif­icent hero­ism among cap­tains, pi­lots, and en­gi­neers, who, time and again, stood man­ful­ly at their posts, though scorched by flames, and cut off from any hope of es­cape, un­til the boat's prow was thrust well in­to the bank, and the pas­sen­gers were all saved. The pi­lots, in the pres­ence of such dis­as­ter, were in the sor­est straits, and were, more­over, the ones of the boat's com­pa­ny up­on whom most de­pend­ed the fate of those on board. Perched at the very top of a large tin­der-​box, all av­enues of es­cape ex­cept a di­rect plunge over­board were quick­ly closed to them. If they left the wheel the cur­rent would in­evitably swing the boat's head down­stream, and she would drift, aim­less­ly, a flam­ing fu­ner­al pyre for all on board. Many a pi­lot stood, with clenched teeth, and eyes firm set up­on the dis­tant shore, while the fire roared be­low and be­hind him, and the ter­ri­fied pas­sen­gers edged fur­ther and fur­ther for­ward as the flames pressed their way to­ward the bow, un­til at last came the grind­ing sound un­der the hull, and the sud­den shock that told of shoal wa­ter and safe­ty. Then, those on the low­er deck might drop over the side, or swarm along the wind­ward gang­plank to safe­ty, but the pi­lot too of­ten was hemmed in by the flames, and per­ished with his ves­sel.

[Il­lus­tra­tion: FEED­ING THE FUR­NACE]

In the year 1840 alone there were 109 steam­boat dis­as­ters chron­icled, with a loss of fifty-​nine ves­sels and 205 lives. The high-​pres­sure boil­ers used on the riv­er, cheap­ly built, and for many years not sub­ject­ed to any of­fi­cial in­spec­tion, con­tribut­ed more than their share to the list of ac­ci­dents. Boil­er ex­plo­sions were so com­mon as to be reck­oned up­on ev­ery time a voy­age was be­gun. Pas­sen­gers were ad­vised to se­cure state­rooms aft when pos­si­ble, as the for­ward part of the boat was the more apt to be shat­tered if the boil­er “went up.” Ev­ery riv­er town had its cit­izens who had sur­vived an ex­plo­sion, and the stock form in­to which to put the hu­mor­ous quip or sto­ry of the time was to have it told by the clerk go­ing up as he met the cap­tain in the air com­ing down, with the de­bris of the boat fly­ing all about them. As the riv­er boats im­proved in char­ac­ter, dis­as­ters of this sort be­came less fre­quent, and the Unit­ed States, by es­tab­lish­ing a rigid sys­tem of boil­er in­spec­tion, and com­pelling en­gi­neers to un­der­go a search­ing ex­am­ina­tion in­to their fit­ness be­fore re­ceiv­ing a li­cense, has done much to guard against them. Yet to-​day, we hear all too fre­quent­ly of riv­er steam­ers blown to bits, and all on board lost, though it is a form of dis­as­ter al­most un­known on East­ern wa­ters where crowd­ed steam­boats ply the Sound, the Hud­son, the Con­necti­cut, and the Po­tomac, year af­ter year, with nev­er a dis­as­ter. The cheap­er ma­te­ri­al of West­ern boats has some­thing to do with this dif­fer­ence, but a cer­tain hap­py-​go-​lucky, dev­il-​may-​care spir­it, which has char­ac­ter­ized the West­ern river­man since the days of the broad­horns, is chiefly re­spon­si­ble. Most of­ten an ex­plo­sion is the re­sult of gross care­less­ness--a sleepy en­gi­neer, and a safe­ty-​valve “out of kil­ter,” as too many of them of­ten are, have killed their hun­dreds on the West­ern rivers. Some­times, how­ev­er, the al­most crim­inal rash­ness, of which cap­tains were guilty, in a mad rush for a lit­tle cheap glo­ry, end­ed in a deaf­en­ing crash, the an­ni­hi­la­tion of a good boat, and the death of scores of her peo­ple by drown­ing, or the aw­ful tor­ture of in­hal­ing scald­ing steam. Ri­val­ry be­tween the dif­fer­ent boats was fierce, and now and then at the sight of a com­peti­tor mak­ing for a land­ing where freight and pas­sen­gers await­ed the first boat to land her gang­plank, the alert cap­tain would not un­nat­ural­ly take some risks to get there first. Those were the mo­ments that re­sult­ed in meth­ods in the en­gine room pic­turesque­ly de­scribed as “feed­ing the fires with fat ba­con and resin, and hav­ing a nig­ger sit on the safe­ty valve.” To such im­promp­tu races might be charged the most ter­ri­fy­ing ac­ci­dents in the his­to­ry of the riv­er.

But the great races, ex­tend­ing some­times for more than a thou­sand miles up the riv­er, and care­ful­ly planned for months in ad­vance, were sel­dom, if ev­er, marred by an ac­ci­dent. For then ev­ery man on both boats was on the alert, from pi­lot down to fu­el pass­er. The boat was trimmed by guid­ance of a spir­it lev­el un­til she rode the wa­ter at pre­cise­ly the draft that as­sured the best speed. Her hull was scraped and oiled, her ma­chin­ery over­hauled, and her fu­el care­ful­ly se­lect­ed. Picked men made up her crew, and all the up­per works that could be dis­posed of were land­ed be­fore the race, in or­der to de­crease air re­sis­tance. It was the cur­rent pleas­antry to de­scribe the cap­tain as shav­ing off his whiskers lest they catch the breeze, and part­ing his hair in the mid­dle, that the boat might be the bet­ter trimmed. Few pas­sen­gers were tak­en, for they could not be re­lied up­on to “trim ship,” but would be sure to crowd to one side or the oth­er at a crit­ical mo­ment. On­ly through freight was shipped--and lit­tle of that--for there would be no stops made from start­ing-​point to goal. Of course, nei­ther boat could car­ry all the fu­el--pine-​wood slabs--need­ed for a long voy­age, but by care­ful pre­ar­range­ment, great “flats” load­ed with wood, await­ed them at spec­ified points in mid­stream. The steam­ers slowed to half-​speed, the flats were made fast along­side by ca­bles, and nim­ble ne­groes trans­ferred the wood, while the race went on. At ev­ery river­side town the wharves and roofs would be black with peo­ple, await­ing the two ri­vals, whose ap­pear­ance could be fore­told al­most as ex­act­ly as that of a rail­way train run­ning on sched­ule time. The fir­ing of ri­fles and can­non, the blow­ing of horns, the wav­ing of flags, greet­ed the rac­ers from the shores by day, and great bon­fires salut­ed them by night. At some of the larg­er towns they would touch for a mo­ment to throw off mail, or to let a pas­sen­ger leap ashore. Then ev­ery nerve of cap­tain, pi­lot, and crew was on edge with the ef­fort to tie up and get away first. Up in the pi­lot-​house the great man of the wheel took shrewd ad­van­tage of ev­ery ed­dy and back cur­rent; out on the guards the hum­blest roustabout stood ready for a life-​risk­ing leap to get the hawser to the dock at the ear­li­est in­stant. All the op­er­ations of the boat had been re­duced to an ex­act sci­ence, so that when the crack pack­ets were pit­ted against each oth­er in a long race, their ma­neu­vers would be as ex­act­ly matched in point of time con­sumed as those of two yachts sail­ing for the “Amer­ica's” cup. Side by side, they would steam for hun­dreds of miles, jock­ey­ing all the way for the most fa­vor­able course. It was a fact that of­ten such boats were so even­ly matched that vic­to­ry would hang al­most en­tire­ly on the skill of the pi­lot, and where of two pi­lots on one boat one was marked­ly in­fe­ri­or, his watch at the wheel could be de­tect­ed by the way the ri­val boat forged ahead. Dur­ing the gold­en days on the riv­er, there were many of these races, but the most fa­mous of them all was that be­tween the “Robert E. Lee” and the “Natchez,” in 1870. These boats, the pride of all who lived along the riv­er at that time, raced from New Or­leans to St. Louis. At Natchez, 268 miles, they were six min­utes apart; at Cairo, 1024 miles, the “Lee” was three hours and thir­ty-​four min­utes ahead. She came in win­ner by six hours and thir­ty-​six min­utes, but the of­fi­cers of the “Natchez” claimed that this was not a fair test of the rel­ative speed of the boats, as they had been de­layed by fog and for re­pairs to ma­chin­ery for about sev­en hours.

Spec­tac­ular and pic­turesque was the river­side life of the great Mis­sis­sip­pi towns in the steam­boat days. Mark Twain has de­scribed the scenes along the lev­ee at New Or­leans at “steam­boat time” in a bit of word-​paint­ing, which brings all the rush and bus­tle, the con­fu­sion, tur­moil and din, clear­ly to the eye:

"It was al­ways the cus­tom for boats to leave New Or­leans be­tween four and five o'clock in the af­ter­noon. From three o'clock on­ward, they would be burn­ing resin and pitch-​pine (the sign of prepa­ra­tion) and so one had the spec­ta­cle of a rank, some two or three miles long, of tall, as­cend­ing columns of coal-​black smoke, a colon­nade which sup­port­ed a roof of the same smoke, blend­ing to­geth­er and spread­ing abroad over the city. Ev­ery out­ward-​bound boat had its flag fly­ing at the jack-​staff, and some­times a du­pli­cate on the verge-​staff astern. Two or three miles of mates were com­mand­ing and swear­ing with more than usu­al em­pha­sis. Count­less pro­ces­sions of freight, bar­rels, and box­es, were spin­ning athwart the lev­ee, and fly­ing aboard the stage-​planks. Be­lat­ed pas­sen­gers were dodg­ing and skip­ping among these fran­tic things, hop­ing to reach the fore­cas­tle com­pan­ion-​way alive, but hav­ing their doubts about it. Wom­en with retic­ules and band­box­es were try­ing to keep up with hus­bands freight­ed with car­pet sacks and cry­ing ba­bies, and mak­ing a fail­ure of it by los­ing their heads in the whirl and roar and gen­er­al dis­trac­tion. Drays and bag­gage-​vans were clat­ter­ing hith­er and thith­er in a wild hur­ry, ev­ery now and then get­ting blocked and jammed to­geth­er, and then, dur­ing ten sec­onds, one could not see them for the pro­fan­ity, ex­cept vague­ly and dim­ly. Ev­ery wind­lass con­nect­ed with ev­ery fore­hatch from one end of that long ar­ray of steam­boats to the oth­er, was keep­ing up a deaf­en­ing whiz and whir, low­er­ing freight in­to the hold, and the half-​naked crews of per­spir­ing ne­groes that worked them were roar­ing such songs as 'De las' sack! De las' sack!!' in­spired to unimag­in­able ex­al­ta­tion by the chaos of tur­moil and rack­et that was driv­ing ev­ery­body else mad. By this time the hur­ri­cane and boil­er decks of the pack­ets would be packed and black with pas­sen­gers, the last bells would be­gin to clang all down the line, and then the pow-​wows seemed to dou­ble. In a mo­ment or two the fi­nal warn­ing came, a si­mul­ta­ne­ous din of Chi­nese gongs with the cry, 'All dat aint go­ing, please to get ashore,' and, be­hold, the pow-​wow quadru­pled. Peo­ple came swarm­ing ashore, over­turn­ing ex­cit­ed strag­glers that were try­ing to swarm aboard. One mo­ment lat­er, a long ar­ray of stage-​planks was be­ing hauled in, each with its cus­tom­ary lat­est pas­sen­ger cling­ing to the end of it, with teeth, nails, and ev­ery­thing else, and the cus­tom­ary lat­est pro­cras­ti­na­tor mak­ing a wild spring ashore over his head.

“Now a num­ber of the boats slide back­ward in­to the stream, leav­ing wide gaps in the ser­ried rank of steam­ers. Cit­izens crowd on the decks of boats that were not to go, in or­der to see the sight. Steam­er af­ter steam­er straight­ens her­self up, gath­ers all her strength, and present­ly comes swing­ing by, un­der a tremen­dous head of steam, with flags fly­ing, smoke rolling, and her en­tire crew of fire­men and deck hands (usu­al­ly swarthy ne­groes) massed to­geth­er on the fore­cas­tle, the best voice in the lot tow­er­ing in their midst (be­ing mount­ed on the cap­stan) wav­ing his hat or a flag, all roar­ing in a mighty cho­rus, while the part­ing can­nons boom, and the mul­ti­tudi­nous spec­ta­tors swing their hats and huz­za. Steam­er af­ter steam­er pulls in­to the line, and the state­ly pro­ces­sion goes wing­ing its flight up the riv­er.”

Un­til 1865 the steam­boats con­trolled the trans­porta­tion busi­ness of all the ter­ri­to­ry drained by the Mis­sis­sip­pi and its trib­utaries. But two caus­es for their un­do­ing had al­ready be­gun to work. The long and fierce­ly-​fought war had put a se­ri­ous check to the nav­iga­tion of the rivers. For long months the Mis­sis­sip­pi was bar­ri­cad­ed by the Con­fed­er­ate works at Is­land Num­ber 10, at New Madrid and at Vicks­burg. Even af­ter Grant and Far­ragut had burst these shack­les nav­iga­tion was at­tend­ed with dan­ger from guer­ril­las on the banks and trade was dead. When peace brought the promise of bet­ter things, the rail­roads were there to take ad­van­tage of it. From ev­ery side they were push­ing their way in­to New Or­leans, build­ing road­ways across the “trem­bling prairies,” and cross­ing the wa­ter-​logged coun­try about the Rigo­lets on long tres­tles. They pen­etrat­ed the cot­ton coun­try and the min­er­al coun­try. They par­al­leled the Ohio, the Ten­nessee, and the Cum­ber­land, as well as the Fa­ther of Wa­ters, and the steam­boat lines be­gan to feel the heavy hand of com­pe­ti­tion. Cap­tains and clerks found it pru­dent to abate some­thing of their dig­ni­ty. In­stead of ship­pers plead­ing for deck-​room on the boats, the boats' agents had to do the plead­ing. In­stead of lev­ees crowd­ed with freight await­ing car­riage there were broad, emp­ty spaces by the riv­er's bank, while the rail­road freight-​hous­es up town held the bales of cot­ton, the bun­dles of staves, the hogsheads of sug­ar, the shin­gles and lum­ber. On long hauls the rail­roads quick­ly se­cured all the North and South busi­ness, though in­deed, the haul­ing of freight down the riv­er for ship­ment to Eu­rope was end­ed for both rail­roads and steam­boats, so far as the prod­ucts raised north of the Ten­nessee line was con­cerned. For a new wa­ter route to the sea had been opened and won­drous­ly de­vel­oped. The Great Lakes were the short­est wa­ter­way to the At­lantic, and New York dug its Erie Canal which af­ford­ed an out­let--pinched and strait­ened, it is true, but still an out­let--for the car­goes of the lake schooners and the ear­ly steam­ers of the un­salt­ed seas. Even the com­mon­wealths form­ing the north bank of the Ohio Riv­er turned their faces away from the stream that had start­ed them on the path­way to wealth and great­ness, and dug canals to Lake Erie, that their wheat, corn, and oth­er prod­ucts might reach tide­wa­ter by the short­est route. The great car­goes from Cincin­nati, St. Louis, and Louisville, be­gan to be leg­ends of the past, and the larg­er boats were put on routes in Louisiana, or on the Mis­sis­sip­pi, from Natchez south, while oth­ers were re­duced to mere lo­cal voy­ages, gath­er­ing up freight from points trib­utary to St. Louis. The glo­ry of the riv­er fad­ed fast, and the fi­nal stroke was dealt it when some man of in­ven­tive mind dis­cov­ered that a lit­tle, puff­ing tug, cost­ing one-​tenth as much as a fine steam­boat, could push broad acres of flat­boats, load­ed with coal, lum­ber, or cot­ton, down the tor­tu­ous stream, and re­turn alone at one-​tenth the ex­pense of a heavy steam­er. That was the fi­nal stroke to the pic­turesque­ness and the ro­mance of riv­er life. The vol­ume of freight car­ried still grows apace, but the glo­ry of Mis­sis­sip­pi steam­boat life is gone for­ev­er.

**Tran­scriber's Note: Page 268: change in­fre­qent­ly to in­fre­quent­ly